Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
This person doesn't know what they're talking about, they're describing *polygyny* as if it's the only type of polyamory there is. Polyamory as a whole simply means having multiple romantic/sexual partners with mutual consent from everyone involved.
#poll
Thanks for clarifying!
I hate you and I hope you die!
150 votes
Polyamory (men having multiple wives) would be good for society as a whole
#poll
Agree
Disagree
264 votes
upvote 12 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

they're also just insane and objectively wrong about everything

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

I was gonna comment that, as a polyam individual, but I knew I’d be downvoted to hell and back and I’m not in the mood to be bullied for being right

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Hi this is my post and I’d like to know how you came to that conclusion? I haven’t spoke about polyamory as a whole at all. I’ve specifically said polygyny and explained it to be structured marriage with multiple women. Happy to discuss if you’re still confused

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

I’d love to hear you explain how I’m wrong, I’ve not heard a single relevant point that shows why I’m wrong

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

why do you think it would work?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

Problems to address in society today - fatherlessness epidemic, single mother epidemic and the detrimental effects these have on the children within them. I think if a good man who is already married is able to take on a second wife, in this case a single mother, it addresses all these issues

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

0/10 rage bait

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

why that and not working on methods to improve socialization for men to decrease the number of bad men?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

him ignoring all the obvious problems w this is my fav part

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

No one but you is confused. lol 😂 I remember that original comment you responding to me by accident on a confession, glad to see the results came out the way I thought they would.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

I think you’re actually straight up stupid in this regard ngl

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 9w

Usually wouldn’t say that but I think you need the blunt truth if you’re being serious

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

How? I’m open to other solutions sure, but that’s not the topic of discussion

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

What obvious problems have I ignored?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 9w

I’m glad you’ve made a note that you’re not normally a use to people. Is it acceptable to call me stupid just because you disagree then? Is that how you were raised? Please if you have a relevant point to make against the ones I’ve made I’d love to hear it instead of personal attacks

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

Nobody has made any point against what what I’m saying tho, all that’s happened is I be been repeatedly downvoted because you disagree but can’t defend your own positions

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

No, the issue is several points have been made, you refuse to see outside of your narrow view.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

I’ve been very open and have discussed with multiple people. I’ve addressed every comment that’s been made and explained why the concern they are raising is a moot one. Can you find any that have not been addressed?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

Okay you think a man fathering multiple kids across different women will lessen the fatherless epidemic, it will literally heighten it. Because that’s definition of creating broken homes, because he can’t be in all those homes and be a good father in them.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

The closest we have to an example is literally Nick Cannon. Because he bounced from woman to woman fathering children, he’s admitted he can’t be there for all of them and so picks which ones need him which is ironic as a father all your kids need you.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

you haven't answered my question

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

Of course you haven’t. You’re not willing to listen to what actually women have to say and are unwilling to change your mind.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

He can be in all those homes and be a good father to them. Nick Cannon is not a good example in any sense of the word. There are men I know personally who have multiple wives and have multiple children from their multiple wives and they see them regularly because they live a structured life. I completely agree with that if there is no structure in the setup then it does not work

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

I did answer your question. I’ve said how do you suggest we do that. And I’ve also said that regardless of how you’re suggesting we do that it doesn’t take away from the fact these issues exist today and the way I am suggesting they are addressed is valid

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

Of course I haven’t what? I’ve been listening and answering everything that’s been brought up. If I was close minded I’d be resorting to personal attacks and avoiding the subject

upvote 1 downvote