Anonymous #4 1w

Ok bud 👍

21

Anonymous #1 1w

“Guys the Guardian dropped another reason for us to say orange man bad”

-3

Anonymous #3 1w

Oh yes, please ignore the 2 other articles all of which are reputable sources whether you want to admit it or not, and refuse to do any personal research. The headlines and presentation might be biased sure but if youre incapable of garnering information THROUGH a biased presentation then you lack the critical thought to have a full opinion. He is a racist. He supports racist policy. He harms POC communities, and limits POC community funding which includes the education of innocent children.

18

Anonymous #3 1w

This is a racist stereotype btw since you wanna pull the not racist card

1

Anonymous #1 1w

“Echoes history of racist narratives” wow such a firm and direct title, it’s definitely not there to feed the narrative that “republicans are racist” because the outlet thinks orange man bad!

-5

Anonymous #1 1w

he goes into POC communities and kicks their children. whatever a poc community is. You mean the communities with section 8 housing and food stamps and free grocery delivery that I pay for? i’ll bet they’re struggling from trumps harsh words

3

Anonymous #4 1w

As I said if you cant go find the source and acknowledge facts through the bias of the presentation then you lack the critical thought to have an opinion/argument on the matter. I read and watch plenty of conservative reports and they say the same information when you neglect the biases

11

Anonymous #1 1w

White working families use SNAP. You are not correct just because you choose to ignore what proves you wrong. Research before you form an opinion instead of just repeating what you're told.

13

Anonymous #1 1w

Per capita, dip shit. There are more white people in this country. Obviously they use more, but look at this chart.

-5

Anonymous #3 1w

This graph has no traceable sources (that I can find) besides a bunch of social media posts. Where is the information sourced from? (Genuine question im not trying to argue)

16

Anonymous #1 1w

https://datacenter.aecf.org/data/tables/9789-children-in-families-that-receive-public-assistance-by-race-and-ethnicity https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6298818/

9

Anonymous #5 1w

I agree! But you can also acknowledge that the people representing a party have a trend if there is one

18

Anonymous #3 1w

Thank you!

4

Anonymous #1 1w

You’re welcome. It was an unreasonably hard search to find any information about it tbh

1

Anonymous #3 1w

Just briefly looking over those links (I will fully read through them later) neither align even remotely with those 2 graphs. One is about the races of children who receive benefits which quite frankly i dont care about their race children deserve food, and one is about what POC are purchasing with their benefits which, processed and unhealthy foods are cheaper so obviously poor families are trying to stretch dollars regardless of race. I'll happily agree to disagree regarding SNAP/PA.

16

Anonymous #1 1w

What trend specifically?

-5

Anonymous #5 1w

Racism, obviously. This assumption didn’t spring out of nowhere. For example, why the hell are they cool with Fuentes, a self proclaimed white supremacist?

22

Anonymous #3 1w

No, instead he spreads rhetoric that gets those POC communities flooded with ICE agents who take them away from their families. For example, a six year old boy was taken by ICE and disappeared. The White House has been eerily silent about him. Where is he? And what do you think about your president being a pedo who raped a 13 year old and murdered her newborn?

6

Anonymous #6 1w

Or donating millions to a woman who called a black child racial slurs… when that many people claiming to be republicans are putting that much support behind a literal racist, you gotta question the whole party imo

14

Anonymous #7 1w

How about when nearly a million was donated to that black kid who murdered a black kid at a track meet? Does that mean the democrats are racist for donating to him?

0

Anonymous #5 1w

Didn’t they buy two Cadillacs with the money? Why are people donating to a murderers family

-1

Anonymous #5 1w

Was the murder racially motivated? Calling a child racial slurs is clearly race based hatred. Murder could be motivated by anything. People donating because they weren’t sure who was right/wrong is not remotely the same as donating to someone you know is clearly racist

0

Anonymous #6 1w

You claim all republicans are racist but still havent given good proof or reason, just a claim. 1 million people following him is 1.5% pf republicans. Just cause some are far right doesnt mean a lot are.

-3

Anonymous #3 1w

And a house i think??

4

Anonymous #5 1w

I think that’s right. I don’t know who’s downvoting me because what I said was factual.

0

Anonymous #5 1w

When did I claim all republicans are racist? I’ll wait for you to find that imaginary quote of something I never said

5

Anonymous #5 1w

That money was donated for the purpose of funding Karmelo’s legal defense. There were a lot of calls for violence and lynching directed at him as if he doesn’t have the basic right to go to court. That is why Anthony’s family recieved the money. The racist who screamed at a Black child received money for being a racist from racists. If you need more clarification, feel free to ask again. :)

4

Anonymous #5 1w

Well yes. It’s almost like sharing their home address until it is no longer safe to live there makes it necessary for them to move. 🤔

5

Anonymous #6 1w

But it was pretty much a mansion… thats misusing funds for their defense, they coulda moved to a nice new area for much cheaper

-1

Anonymous #5 1w

And I know this is the third response I have made in a row but bear with me here. Why the silence on the republicans’ support for Nick Fuentes? Is it because you know it’s wrong? Or because you yourself are a supporter of his ideology?

6

Anonymous #5 1w

I never even mentioned Trump 😭😭 seeing things that aren’t there is not a good sign. Maybe check in with someone about that…

1

Anonymous #5 1w

And the topic was about “trends” in the Republican Party. A trend doesn’t mean everyone’s taking part, it just means a noticeable amount are. If that many people are involved, that clearly shows a trend of republicans supporting/condoning racism. Duh people are going to question the whole party when so many are like that. I still never said all republicans are racists

2