Yik Yak logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
OnlyPolls icon
OnlyPolls 1d
If insurance companies can reject coverage even if they paid, then women can reject men on a second date if even they paid
#poll
Agree
Disagree
357 votes
comment

40
upvote 17 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d
post
upvote 76 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Except it’s morally fucked up when insurance companies do it. It’s fine when women do it

upvote 57 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

There’s no contract that’s says women have to keep dating men if they pay and insurance companies should be penalized for that

upvote 38 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

The insurance thing is extremely immoral, I honestly hate insurance shenanigans. And if your going to reject him then don’t let him pay, split it. He shouldn’t be paying that soon anyway, and you should be financially independent as an adult.

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

You don’t have to pay for someone’s meal, and they’re not obligated to do anything for you in return either?? If you want a woman to sleep with you for money find a prostitute. Women aren’t insurance companies, weirdo

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Voted disagree only bc this analogy is just a stupid joke at best

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Fact check

post
upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8h

I dont think these correlate dog

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

lmfao like where is the correlation💀💀 women ≠ insurance companies the point of insurance is to INSURE u when u need it. the point of women.. is NOT to serve men & always be available. because they are humans with free will.🤔

upvote 36 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

Same thing with insurance companies they is no contract either

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

Insurance companies DO have a contract it’s simply unconscionable

upvote 31 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

No they don’t you can leave insurance companies anytime, there is no long term commitments or contracts

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

PAYING MONTHLY IS A COMMITMENT JACKASS. I can’t my money back by leaving

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

And a contract is any agreement between two parties. I don’t know what you think a contract is but there is definitely a contract between the insurance company and the client

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

Health insurance companies are not forcing you to pay them, if you don’t like their terms and conditions, you can leave them

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1d

As a matter of fact, you can’t leave them. Insurance companies have skewed the health care industry so that you need them in order to survive. This might shock you, but it IS possible for a company to leave somebody without a choice. That’s why we have a government. It’s supposed to step in when a system exploits people

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1d

And how many of them can afford treatment without it?

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

Treatment is also optional too, no one is forcing u take the treatment or pay for it

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1d

Nature is forcing you to. Nobodies forcing you not to take a bullet if I put a gun to your head. That doesn’t mean I’m void of any wrongdoing

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

It’s natural selection if they can’t afford it they should have made better life choices

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1d

So it’s natural selection if I take your money and shoot you in the head?

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

No your breaking the law

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1d

So is an unconscionable clause

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

If you steal money then you’re breaking the law, but the insurance company isn’t breaking any laws

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 1d

I’m not gonna try to explain civil law to you, but yes they do. Just because they haven’t been prosecuted doesn’t mean they aren’t breaking the law

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 1d

And what does it matter if it’s against the law? Is that really how you measure morality?

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

No one is above the law

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 1d

Incorrect. Everytime someone speeds, they break the law. Doesn’t make them a bad person, and it doesn’t have any relevance to malignant insurance practices

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

People like Dr. King and President Trump broke the law, doesn’t make them bad people

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

And you think that’s an argument against MY stance?

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

I’m the one saying that the law isn’t relevant

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1d

Your natural selection comment at the start of this thread is disgusting. If you’re laid off and are not hired to a new job quickly, and in the meantime need a lifesaving procedure that you cannot afford without insurance and a source of income, you deserve death because of “your choices”? Sure.

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 1d

So in this case should the doctors do the procedure for free if they can’t afford it?

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

They should get a payout from the insurance company that THEY hired

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

They don’t have insurance??? They literally lost it

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

If you paid for insurance, you should get insurance

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1d

The point of insurance companies and all companies is to make money

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

ignoring my point entirely. A lot of peoples’ hardships are not a product of their choices, but circumstances beyond their control. And what of children in families who cannot afford medical care? Does your same flippant attitude extend to them—minors who cannot generate income and care for their own health? To answer your question, though: Yes, I believe we should have universal healthcare. Yes, I believe people should have equal access to necessary medical procedures regardless of income.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 23h

this is assuming the girl already is planning on rejecting him which isn’t necessarily true either

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 7h

Even if they were not breaking the law you can not use that argument against someone who is advocating for change. If we always appeal to the way things already are then progress is impossible. You have to consider ethics

upvote 5 downvote