I used to think this, like why would they bring kids into that situation? But then I realized the more nuanced take is- *we should be working to make sure far fewer people are in poverty so having kids isn’t a privilege afforded only to the wealthy*
68
Anonymous30w
This is the liberal version of saying that only white people should have kids
33
Anonymous30w
why would anyone disagree with this? if you are poor, how do you expect to pay for food, clothes, shelter, bills, school? it’s extremely selfish to bring a child into that situation
28
Anonymous30w
I guess agree but this question is so short sighted
17
Anonymous30w
What if people have kids when they’re doing fine financially but then fall into poverty later on? Happens all the time
16
Anonymous#130w
Liberal version?
13
Anonymous#230w
If we made a law saying that people in poverty can’t have kids because childhood poverty is bad, according to liberals, the end result would that way more white people would have kids and minorities can’t have kids anymore
16
Anonymous#230w
Poverty is a stage of life, nothing wrong with it
8
Anonymous#130w
So you’re assuming only non white people are in poverty?
23
AnonymousOP30w
Rich people on average have much fewer children anyways.
6
Anonymous#430w
That’s different
5
Anonymous#630w
Do you understand that having a child is not always intentional? People do the best with the situations they are in.
7
Anonymous#630w
Should adults in 3rd world countries not have kids? There is lack of food, schools, and clothes in those environments
11
Anonymous#930w
i do know that it’s not always intentional. i’m talking about the people that do it intentionally and don’t try to prevent it.
11
Anonymous#330w
if people in 3rd world countries can’t take care of themselves, how do they expect to take care of themself and another fully dependent human?
8
Anonymous#630w
You realize everyone is poor in a 3rd world country
9
Anonymous#130w
majority of them are but not all
6
Anonymous#630w
In countries such as Somalia, childhood poverty is over 95%