Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
If you were on a jury and the defendant is Dexter Morgan (fictional serial killer who only killed other killers, rapists, etc.) would you find him guilty?
#poll
Not guilty at all
Not guilty by insanity
Guilty
191 votes
upvote 5 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 19h

Good poll

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Not guilty by insanity strictly so it doesnt get thrown out, chances are if there is a jury/trial theres enough proof that he did it, jury decisions can be overruled if judge or one side thinks the jury choice isnt representative

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11h

he didn't leave much evidence besides circumstantial

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10h

Yes guilty. Because he did it and that’s how being on a jury works.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

Not true, a judge cannot “throw out” a case because they suspect a jury’s findings weren’t of a factual basis. It’s why jury nullification exists (though is rarely ((reportedly)) exercised)

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 22h

The verdict absolutely can get thrown out, theres a process for it its not just hmm I dont agree but there are checks and balances within a court the same way there is in government

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 19h

I mean, there’s an appeals system, but the right to appeal is guaranteed to the defendant in a case—not the prosecution. If a judge were to throw out a verdict on the basis, that would require a new trial in order to find a new verdict. Such a scenario would be a textbook definition of double jeopardy, which is unconstitutional according to the 5th Amendment.

upvote 1 downvote