Anonymous #2 10w

You can look all this up btw.

3

Anonymous #2 10w

Where can I find the statement from Bradley Edwards? I tried searching but couldn’t find it

4

Anonymous OP 10w

https://www.vox.com/2019/7/9/20686347/jeffrey-epstein-trump-bill-clinton

2

Anonymous OP 10w

https://www.elle.com/culture/career-politics/a28320376

2

Anonymous #2 10w

Even if this is true, I’m curious to see if there’s evidence absolving Trump of participating in Epstein’s activities- we know Trump is one to turn on friends over business disagreements / petty things

3

Anonymous OP 10w

Sure, there’s nothing wrong with asking questions.

3

Anonymous OP 10w

Hehe, boii do we

1

Anonymous #5 10w

And, sadly, he’d still have been elected

2

Anonymous #4 10w

Overnight?? People have been talking about this for years & years

3

Anonymous OP 10w

What? Yeah. I know. I didn’t mean LAST night. I meant years ago, when he was caught. It still captured the public imagination overnight (not last night; A night). And it was silly then too. Does it become less so after a certain number of years pass?

-2

Anonymous #4 9w

..how is that “fun” to believe? I don’t think people are saying that Epstein was the ringleader of a giant trafficking cartel, just that he organized bad stuff on the island for a lot of people, and that’s still damning enough

4

Anonymous #6 9w

Youre asking me? One of the few ppl NOT mythologizing/sensationalizing it? You tell me why it’s fun. Not bc of all the compelling evidence, surely. Like I said, I assume the simple, boring explanation, based on what we know. Hows that any different? Why do we assume he “organized a lot of bad stuff for a lot of people”? Sure statutory rape is damning, but usually is a one-man job. The idea he was an organizer for a whos-who of the rich and powerful (or anyone) is apparently from thin air.

-2

Anonymous #4 9w

I don’t understand what your argument is here. He’s the owner of the island, and the organizer of these “parties”, no? I thought that was pretty well established as fact, and don’t really see how “maybe he hired someone else to organize the party” makes any difference to either of our points. Or are you trying to say the island parties didn’t happen? I’m not really sure what part of the general understanding here you’re trying to critique

2

Anonymous #6 9w

I’m sure he did throw parties on his island. Who wouldn’t? And I gather that when he killed himself, he thought some pretty strong evidence was about to come to light that he committed statutory rape (I can’t think of a lesser offense that would prompt a rational person to do that). What I don’t see is any evidence that he did so at his parties. Or that anyone did. Or even that anyone but him, famous or obscure, showed up to fuck escorts or abductees, underage or otherwise, procured by him or

-1

Anonymous #6 9w

not, at his island parties. And I honestly think if any evidence existed connecting his crimes to his big parties with lots of other famous people, we WOULD have heard of it. But the news seems to be letting us invent the connection where the evidence doesn’t. The simplest explanation would be there isn’t one. He was a rapist, and sometimes he threw parties. And I told you what I thought the “general understanding” was and why I thought it was silly. Way up there^

1