Anonymous #3 12h

Well the question is how do you define rape? Is getting fucked while barely conscious and unable to say no after having consented before being in that state rape? What if 5 more guys join in after you only agreed to do a threesome? Terminology seems to be everything, since technically they didn’t use force, but it still wasn’t validly consensual.

11

Anonymous #4 10h

There is a profound difference between voluntary inebriation and incapacitation. And an overwhelming amount of testimonial evidence that supports she wasn’t even close to “barely conscious”, in fact, based on the testimony I’ve read she may have been more sober and lucid than some of the men she was initiating and consenting to group sex with. If that’s the standard you’re applying I’d argue her actions more closely aligned with SA than those of the young men.

-4

Anonymous #4 10h

She consented prior, based on testimony during, and reaffirmed repeatedly in documented communications the consensual nature afterwards. This is as clear cut as it comes. Even calling the consensual encounter a “gangbang” which is explicitly a term used for group sex of more than three. So how you come to the erroneous conclusion that this wasn’t “validly consensual” doesn’t seem tied to the actual facts and evidence. Or her own statements for that matter.

-5

Anonymous #3 6h

CONSENT CAN ALWAYS BE REVOKED AND ONLY WHEN YOU ARE CHECKED IN ON. SHUT THE FUCK UP. RAPE IS NOT A PARTISAN ISSUE. YOU SOUND LIKE A RAPIST.

0

Anonymous #3 6h

Do you force girls to continue to have sex when they don’t want to bc they said yes ONCE? IT NEEDS TO BE CONTINUOUS! Don’t ever fuck ever again holy shit

8

Anonymous #5 6h

You can’t revoke consent retroactively though and lie simply because your reputation was ruined for being a whore and you were uninvited to the fraternity’s Halloween party.

-1

Anonymous #5 6h

By all accounts and testament consent was given continuously at every step and her wishes were respected. Which is exactly what SHE said and reaffirmed repeatedly after the gangbang. But let’s ignore her own words when it’s not convenient for her lying victim narrative. Or the conclusion by the DA that the sexual encounter was “voluntary, conscious and consensual”.

0