Anonymous #1 3w

Did you read the email correspondences released today?

24

Anonymous OP 3w

Source?

-6

Anonymous #2 3w

ABC, CNN, Newsweek, NYT, etc

26

Anonymous OP 3w

Drop link perhaps

-6

Anonymous #2 3w

If you google “epstein emails released” all of these links will come up🙂

30

Anonymous OP 3w

“House Democrats on Wednesday released emails” bro so we don’t get to see the emails and all I get are liberal media saying that democrats are saying stuff like this 😭😭🙏 I actually had faith for once that there was any real evidence bro 😭😭😭 like come on dude stop giving me this bs this is why everyone is more annoyed by liberals rn bro is literally not up for election again no matter what u think about this third term bs it’s fake and or he’s not getting voters anyway!Like please quit

-7

Anonymous OP 3w

The emails weren’t even released that would mean they’re available to the public apparently they’re only available to house dems

-6

Anonymous #2 3w

No one is claiming this is conclusive proof- but it gives legitimacy to the concerns. It’s not the democrats “saying stuff” - they released documents.

14

Anonymous OP 3w

They say they “released documents” but then where are the damn emails bro 😭 I don’t see these shits anywhere dude

-3

Anonymous #2 3w

What do you mean? The files were shared with media outlets and posted online (in redacted form, to protect victims)

12

Anonymous OP 3w

I found it both the first 2 I checked were on a pay wall

-1

Anonymous #2 3w

Added note - why do we care what he’s doing still to slander him he’s not up for election next term

-10

Anonymous #2 3w

It seems a little odd that you went from “it seems fake” to “why do we care what he’s doing?” Why do we care if he was involved in sex trafficking young girls with his longtime billionaire friend?🤔

64

Anonymous #2 3w

You can’t be serious

35

Anonymous #2 3w

Why do you talk like a middle school boy who spends all his time between Fox News and twitch streams

20

Anonymous #2 3w

Same lol. Their “sources” are literally just opinion pieces with no evidence in them 😭

7

Anonymous #5 3w

Bruh insulting me is crazy work when I don’t vote either way you immediately assume anyone who doesn’t whole heartily agree with you is stupid. You literally insulted me rather than disagreeing with anything I said bro ad hominem is a logic fallacy not just argumentative. Please mature and use your brain, I lean left if anything btw!!

6

Anonymous #2 3w

Only stance or reason I would say that I lean left is I support Obama care/ universal health care and alternative energy (specifically nuclear)

4

Anonymous #1 3w

Do you know the difference between a news article & an opinion piece?

5

Anonymous OP 3w

Yep, that’s why I choose opinion piece. An article would be more objective and actually contain facts.

1

Anonymous #2 3w

You’re absolutely right! Why strive for justice at all!? It’s not like they’re gonna live forever! In fact- let’s set all criminals free!! Yeah they might do some harm in the short term- but hey- it’s not like they’re gonna do that forever- And what about the victims? They can get over it. But a false accusation could ruin someone’s entire life!! We shouldn’t convict anyone! Just in case they’re innocent. Right? 😁

5

Anonymous #6 3w

So court hearings matter when they’re illegals but not presidents of opposing political parties from you? I think you forget the court functions beyond reasonable doubt and their is PLENTY of reasonable doubt here especially considering the source of said information believe what you want to hear

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Two very important questions! It does seem fake why should I believe it? And why should I care so much when the thing we are saying this minimal evidence is targeting is a president? Hey btw the Clinton’s, Biden and many house and senate democrats past and present all are very associated with Epstein in fact the Clinton’s are heavily tied to his “suicide” during Hillary’s campaign btw

1

Anonymous #2 3w

Bit hypocritical that association matters now that it has to do with trump and not the Clinton

1