Yik Yak logo
OnlyPolls icon
OnlyPolls 1w
is objectumsexual valid (sexual attraction to objects)
#poll
yes
no
what the actual fuck???
247 votes
comment

12
upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

I don’t think it’s a part of LGBT but it’s also harmless

upvote 26 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w
post
upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

If they keep it to themselves then whatever I guess. If that’s saying it’s valid then sure. It’s really weird but not hurting anyone.

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

I have never heard anyone in the actual queer community claim "objectumsexual" to be a real thing, but if it is real then idc I guess 🤷‍♀️ not hurting anyone

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

to me that’s as valid as any other paraphilia

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4d

that’s their business

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6d

Yeah but that’s a link/fetish not a sexuality

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

Correct. It hurts nobody. I’m a robotfucker/objectum enjoyer. I personally don’t call it “objectumsexual” myself, but yeah- objectum is a spectrum- not all of us bang toasters

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

My favorite way to explain it: 4-6 is objectum to me, but it’s all kinda there

post
upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

I agree that it’s not really an LGBT+ identity, I consider my objectum enjoyment its own thing

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6d

So I guess “philia“ would be better than “sexual

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 6d

Oh if it includes robots then I guess I am one, I just never heard the "objectum" term before

upvote 3 downvote
Download Terms of Service Privacy Policy Community Guardrails
TikTok Instagram X