Yik Yak logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
OnlyPolls icon
OnlyPolls 16w
is objectumsexual valid (sexual attraction to objects)
#poll
yes
no
what the actual fuck???
252 votes
comment

11
upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 16w

I don’t think it’s a part of LGBT but it’s also harmless

upvote 26 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 16w
post
upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 16w

If they keep it to themselves then whatever I guess. If that’s saying it’s valid then sure. It’s really weird but not hurting anyone.

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 16w

I have never heard anyone in the actual queer community claim "objectumsexual" to be a real thing, but if it is real then idc I guess 🤷‍♀️ not hurting anyone

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

that’s their business

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 16w

Yeah but that’s a link/fetish not a sexuality

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 16w

Correct. It hurts nobody. I’m a robotfucker/objectum enjoyer. I personally don’t call it “objectumsexual” myself, but yeah- objectum is a spectrum- not all of us bang toasters

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 16w

My favorite way to explain it: 4-6 is objectum to me, but it’s all kinda there

post
upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16w

I agree that it’s not really an LGBT+ identity, I consider my objectum enjoyment its own thing

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 16w

So I guess “philia“ would be better than “sexual

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 16w

Oh if it includes robots then I guess I am one, I just never heard the "objectum" term before

upvote 3 downvote