Anonymous #1 10w

Not really

-3

Anonymous #2 10w

There are countless videos that debunk moon landing conspiracies, but it boils down to this: Faking the footage we have is not possible with 1960s technology.

5

Anonymous #3 10w

It is possible, just very unlikely

1

Anonymous #1 10w

Nah I’d say it’s easier to fake going to the moon than actually going to the moon from a common sense standpoint, and considering the craze the US had with the Russians during that time, they’d have every motive to do so.

1

Anonymous #1 10w

I believe the moon landing was real lmao. Im just playing devils advocate.

2

Anonymous #2 10w

Possible, but potentially more difficult to do than actually going to the moon.

1

Anonymous #3 10w

How would faking footage be more difficult than successfully launching and building from scratch a rocket into space and landing a human on the moon when it’s never been done before? From a pure probabilistic standpoint, faking the footage would be easier. However, it would be excessive, and I don’t think the US would do all that to keep up with a lie they’d continuously need to preserve for their name. JFK also was one of the good ones.

2

Anonymous #2 10w

They did build from scratch a rocket that was capable of landing a human on the moon. We have extensive documentation on the Saturn V and the rest of the spacecraft, as well as artifacts from them sitting in museum, including command modules. Not to mention the retroreflector placed on the moon during the Apollo 11 mission, which is still usable to this day. Faking the footage and planting evidence that convincing would have involved making tech capable of, and actually going to, the moon.

3

Anonymous #3 10w

So for the conspiracy to actually hold water it would have been much harder to fake it than to go to the moon.

1

Anonymous #3 10w

See now you’re arguing critically and not like a sheep. I agree completely.

1