Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Outperforming s&p on a week to week or month to month basis is irrelevant if you hold highly volatile stocks
upvote 4 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

Duh

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

Even year to year it means nothing. You have to beat the market for something like 15 consecutive years in order for it to be statistically significant. Anything less can be attributed to luck.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

I would argue the exact opposite. Volatility is background noise, if your macro investing an asset class who’s underlying industry/sector is seeing a significant historical change, than the performance is everything, unless your investing on a short time horizon and already risking needing the money before the investment has matured.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

I know you’d think it’s common sense but people on here have no critical thinking

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 6w

Holy jargon batman! This guy sounds smart!

upvote 2 downvote