Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
“It’s easy to win in a bullish market.” Once again tell me you know nothing of trading without telling me. You don’t just trade for stocks to go up. You trade long and short positions it doesn’t matter what the market does. (I mean overall)(also it does..
upvote 7 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Agreed OP, people really don’t understand trading. People focus on % moves when they should be focusing on risk/reward. If you know what you’re doing, you can make great money. This is a trade I’m in right now, totally risk free, with ~$1000 already realized. And if you use prop firms, you’re not even risking your own capital.

post
upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Like 1% of traders become profitable for it to matter

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

I’ve had people say that you can’t claim to outperform SPY without trading for 15 years. Like yea I’m not saying I cracked the code but I made my salary in 3 months and am up 70% across 5 years. I think that’s pretty good

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

But not for your profitability

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Also, tired of the “it’s just gambling with extra step” or “trading is just another word for sports betting” has nothing to do with sports betting people be p*sing me off just repeating what people who either don’t know what they are talking about or just aren’t willing to learn or take the risk

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w
post
upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Here’s today I’m one of those “1% statistics” it took 4 years but I’ve worked my butt of to get here and lost a lot of money and gained a lot to get here.

post
upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

Okay, but that’s because everyone says it’s gambling, no body makes it. You know starting your own business is the same way. Taking a big risk, lots of capital to start up, you lose money you gain money, and statistically only 1% make it as well now you’ll be like well no there’s lots of people who make it well yeah same with traders what counts as making it? How many people try? How many people start with the intention of day trading?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Your just repeating what you heard “like one percent” don’t repeat see for yourself grow learn and wonder don’t stop wondering just because someone said oh you’ll never make it

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

I just want to teach people, because I know it’s possible yet people don’t want to listen

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

That is pretty good. People will give you every reason in the book why it doesn’t work even when it does. Never understood that

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

VOO is up 101% over 5 years. You could have done literally nothing and made 31% more. That is not “pretty good”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

Yea that would make sense if I had more than $500 in year one and didn’t have less than $1500 before year 2. Most of my money put towards the brokerage was in the last year and a half so it’s not really accurate to say I underperformed. YTD I’m up over 32% compared to less than 13%.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

Before year 3*

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

On paper returns seem lower, but when you take into account contributions being heavily weighted towards the last two years I outperformed. It’s tricky comparing performance with extremely unbalanced contributions. I guess I should have clarified and used a shorter range.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

It is most definitely accurate to say you underperformed. Someone who invested $1000 in VOO 5 years ago and never touched it would have more money than you if you also started with $1000 5 years ago. Like, that’s literally the definition of underperforming. You may have done better one or two years, but your lifetime returns are underperforming.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

See what I mean blah blah blah you didn’t out performe

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Like idk man they don’t take into account that if you withdrawal it’s sometimes taken out of p and l amount

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Great cope

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

How am I coping? I make more in a week than you probably do in a month.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

Buddy. I did not have the capital to invest long term. This is extremely flawed logic. Im up 32.78% YTD. Thats 2-3x the performance of SPY. My portfolio thinks I had a base amount of 64k. The percentage of returns is calculated based off that. My brokerage doesn’t account for the actual base investment I put in. Most of that 110% return over the past 5 years was in the first fucking year when I was broke

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

You get it. Like for me I trade 10% of my port for a 400% move which in the full account is only 20-40% depending

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Right it’s like people don’t understand percentages at all. Unless your brokerage accounts for contribution date in the calculation the % return number is mostly meaningless.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Downvoting this is wild

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

Exactly.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

In case you still don’t understand I started with $500. Until about mid 2023 I had less than 20k. My current all time gains are based on my total amount deposited into the brokerage - withdrawals made through that period. That puts it at a base 64k roughly. I’m up 70%. You can go into a calculator and multiply 64k by 1.7 which gets you to roughly the 110k I have now. Everytime I make a deposit (the majority has been deposited this year), the return percentage actually declines.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

So the only way that you could concretely say I underperformed spy using my roughly 70% gain is if the amount I put in was 64k initially and I never deposited or withdrew again. % return comparisons are extremely difficult to calculate and you can’t say how someone is performing without consistent contributions. My 401k is a better example. It is up over 20% YTD and has extremely consistent contribution amounts spread out at equal intervals.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

Niceeee man!

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Thanks! I think the other thing people miss is that trading is also about risk management. Losing is inevitable, but you have to be in control of how much you lose. And once you secure profits, you can reinvest that into the safe stuff like VOO. People act like you can’t invest in VOO and trade at the same time lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

Honestly, it’s statistics. If you win 50% of the time you have to have a risk to reward better or equal than 2:1

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Also, exactly my plan is to have intraday trading to get me those quick and good profits, then risky dividends like yieldnax, then growth and safe dividend stocks. So it will filter from riskiest to safest

upvote 1 downvote