Anonymous #1 3w

Headed towards massive hyperinflation as they print more money and inflation goes through the roof, while interest rates hold at record lows. Meanwhile we have 3 more years left, before we can bring in somebody with some actual economic policy strategy to try and rise an already sunken ship.

20

Anonymous #2 3w

Yeah… voting will fix this…

4

Anonymous #5 3w

They might not’ve. Iykyk

13

Anonymous #2 3w

Stagflation time. The wealthy will see this as an investment opportunity, everyone else not so much. I hope the next midterm and presidential election will be fair but I doubt it will be. These ghouls will do anything to stay in power and keep enjoying no consequences for their actions

2

Anonymous #6 3w

I try not to entertain fraudulent election result theories. Pisses me off when republicans do it every single election

5

Anonymous #5 3w

I know it sounds like cope, but it legitimately might be the case this time. Look into it, there’s enough actionable proof for some states/districts (idk the terminology) to both comment on it and start investigations. A lot isn’t adding up.

-1

Anonymous #6 3w

I’ve seen some of it but to be honest unless there is some damning evidence that the entire election was stolen I’m not gonna bother looking into it. Unless it can be proven, we are still stuck with Trump. Just gotta ride it out

2

Anonymous #6 3w

You are smoking cracking if you think the election was fraudulent 💀

2

Anonymous #8 3w

Look it up dawg. Better email those districts too to inform them that they’re lying.

0

Anonymous #6 3w

“look it up dawg” 😂

2

Anonymous #8 3w

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNEclc3tzga/?igsh=MTQ0dGEwbWN4bHQwZw== https://www.instagram.com/p/DMySZO6S2eX/?igsh=MWQwbWhnZGg4b3MzcA== Read it and weep. Or at least, give an actual response, not just parroting what I said. Or be a sheep, idc

1

Anonymous #6 3w

Multiple fact checks already debunked the “NSA audit” claim there’s no record of it ever happening. And the “ECO 1188 backdoor” stuff is publicly documented as a minor software update that was approved by the EAC not some secret hack. I’m no sheep I go with verifiable evidence. If there’s really proof it should hold up in court and in official audits not just some crackpot blog. (1/2)

1

Anonymous #6 3w

And for the ETA video they are applying data tools to explore election results. Calling their findings proof of manipulation massively oversells the data and you would have to prove causation which I’m sure you’d know right or are you just a sheep believing whatever affirms your emotions… 😂

1

Anonymous #8 3w

(2/2)

1

Anonymous #8 3w

Thoughts on Jan 6 🤨

0

Anonymous #6 3w

Lmaooooo what type of deflection is this are you going to respond to me debunking your braindead theory 💀 and for the record January 6th wasn’t good so I’m not sure what that attempt at a gotcha was

1

Anonymous #8 3w

“Braindead theory” when there’s multiple credible sources reporting on investigations across the country. Sure man. What about cases Rockland County NY, where the democratic senator got votes but magically Harris got none? With citizens reporting that they knew they voted for Harris, confirming that Harris votes being reported as 0 incorrect? Also, the way you’re acting, just had to check.

5

Anonymous #6 3w

Saying Harris won or that millions of her votes weren’t counted isn’t backed by any credible data. Sure like every election there may have been minor discrepancies or clerical errors but nothing close to the scale you’re claiming and if there was it would be nonstop mentioned by the Democrat politicians.

1

Anonymous #6 3w

It’s ironic because back in 2020 I bet you were telling Republicans that stolen election claims were baseless and now that the shoe is on the other foot and the result didn’t go your way you’re making the same kind of claims 😂

1

Anonymous #8 3w

Largely not similar, actually. I wasn’t immediately screaming that there’s no way my cult leader, known for hatred of others (amongst other things), could have possibly legitimately lost the election. Wasn’t until the stories started coming out that I thought maybe something was up. Before that, I was simply deeply disappointed in my country. Also, Biden didn’t have a billionaire oligarch buy himself into office and then repeatedly talk about how much he “worked” with the voting machines, etc.

5

Anonymous #6 3w

This is the same thing taking scattered stories and twisting them into a stolen election narrative. At this point it’s either willful ignorance or just plain ignorance. Being upset about the outcome doesn’t make the conspiracy true and if there were any real substance to your theory it would’ve been pursued at the federal level.

0

Anonymous #6 3w

Loving the downvotes to my rational thought. “The evidence” you provided doesn’t suffice in proving that a 2.3 million deficit in votes for Harris was because of large scale voter fraud. Local glitches or oddities don’t magically equal millions of missing votes. Just because you feel a certain way about the election doesn’t mean it is the case.

1

Anonymous #8 3w

Hard disagree. An active lawsuit for Rockland County, where “a New York State Supreme Court judge ruled that the allegations were serious enough for the discovery phase to proceed”, isn’t substantive to you? Okay. But tell me again how I’m the stupid one.

1

Anonymous #8 3w

Oh, another way that it’s different than 2020. I haven’t physically stormed and desecrated our nation’s capitol in order to throw a bitch fit. Unlike them, I have more control over my “emotions” than a toddler.

0

Anonymous #6 3w

Second point is has no relevance to the argument at hand it’s just a jab at republicans.

1

Anonymous #8 3w

You keep saying that what I’m talking about is the same as what happened in 2020. So, I’ll keep iterating how it isn’t.

1

Anonymous #6 3w

Incorrect I am saying what you are doing in plain terms is claiming there was enough election fraud/negligence that the result of the 2024 election should be overturned which is the same thing that happened with republicans in 2020. You are adding the non sequiturs not me. You are refusing to accept the result without credible nationwide evidence that proves the deficit of 2.3 million votes is artificial.

1

Anonymous #8 3w

If there really was a strong case for fraud it wouldn’t just be floating around in a Yik yak personal finance comment sections it would already be challenged in federal courts investigated by Congress and headlining in every major media outlet. The fact that hasn’t happened tells you all you need to know.

-1

Anonymous #8 3w

You’re referring to the courts and congress that are controlled by Trump cronies… yeah man you’re so right, how silly of me to not blindly follow the dismissals of his loyalist puppets. I should also believe them about the 3p$t3in list not existing anymore, huh?🙄 Maybe you’re just having trouble accepting that this country is more compromised than you’re comfortable thinking about. It isn’t just “floating around YikYak”; again, there’s many sources discussing it.

-2

Anonymous #6 3w

Incorrect on that as well our country is controlled by Israel and Zionist Billionaires without a doubt

5

Anonymous #6 3w

For Epstein, high ranking officials and affiliates from both parties are potentially implicated so there’s bipartisan incentive to keep things quiet. That’s why skepticism persists and why people across the spectrum doubt the government’s narrative. But with Harris it’s only partisan. If there were even a shred of evidence she really won, left leaning officials, outlets, and activists would have blown it wide open. The fact that didn’t happen is proof the claim has no substance.

1

Anonymous #8 3w

Also, it’s kinda the nuclear option. If its true with concrete facts, it’s gonna come to light, however to even suggest the election was stolen risks a Jan 6th type situation which wouldn’t end pretty

4

Anonymous #2 3w

Agree and to add not only that but the suggestion comes from emotional coping and blowing cases out of proportion. Like I said before there likely were clerical errors (like in every election) but there is nothing to show that could justify the gap in votes between Trump and Harris in 2024.

1

Anonymous #6 3w

I await your reply 👍

1

Anonymous #2 3w

I argue it doesn’t risk J6, because Harris supporters aren’t rabid and mob-like enough to lose their collective minds to the point of doing what Trump supporters did (at the beckon of Trump, might I add, which is also something no candidate with an ounce of decorum would do).

0

Anonymous #8 3w

You talked about bipartisan vs partisan. You fail to acknowledge how many republicans are MAGAts, which is truly a cult status at this point. This means that Trump cannot and will not ever do wrong in their minds, and they CANNOT ever be convinced otherwise. So, that large population has zero interest in attempting to investigate if their leader was fraudulently elected. Making bipartisanship in this issue impossible.

1

Anonymous #6 3w

It’s like you don’t even understand my point… either that or you are intentionally not contending with it…

4

Anonymous #8 3w

You got nothing else to do but wait for some rando on an anonymous app to talk to you? Sad, sorry for you

0

Anonymous #6 3w

Lmao I’m bored and it is 1 in the morning. Very funny how you get so vicious just because I disagree with your unsubstantiated claims.

1

Anonymous #8 3w

Lmfao calling this vicious is wild. Bro a little squishy? Anyway, by my count you’ve ignored the whole Musk spelling out his involvement with the election/voting machines thing, and the recent partisanship comment.

0

Anonymous #6 3w

You are the one who misunderstood to partisan comment from the get go you are completely ignoring what I’m saying. You can’t compare the Epstein files to the claim you are making that Harris won and the election was stolen.

1

Anonymous #6 3w

As for the Musk thing the onus would be on you to prove fraud instead of merely making the implication of it…

1

Anonymous #6 3w

Not necessarily viscous towards me but how you go on political hairdryer paragraphs attacking Trump and Trump supporters. If you want to make your points use substance to back your arguments without getting into the weeds of petty attacks.

1