Anonymous #1 1w

the kardashians, drake or floyd mayweather who literally took a 10 minute flight with is plane, have a much higher carbon footprint than taylor and they don't do anything like that for the environment btw. Also 2022 the company yard published the list of celebrities with the highest carbon emissions and taylor swift was very high on top on that list.

0

Anonymous #1 1w

But what many don't know is that taylor's private jet isn't just used by her but it's also being rented by other people... so please just do the math. And btw if you order anything from temu, shein or even by something at h&m you are no better than taylor cause those companies carbon emissions are much worse and just a 100 companies are responsible for 71% of global warming.

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Ofc private jets are bad but if you come on here with those arguments please don't just use them to only criticize taylor but every other celebrity as well!

-2

Anonymous #1 1w

so... did you ever get the dent smoothed out from the drop kicking or...

1

Anonymous OP 1w

so you don't have a better argument or...

0

Anonymous #1 1w

babe i'm not gonna argue with straw men. you failed to comprehend the very obvious point of this post. you just fervently wrote 4 paragraphs defending her CO2 emissions when the criticism being made is that NOT BEING A CHILD RAPIST IS NOT SOMETHING WE "GOTTA GIVE HER PROPS FOR" this is literally the bare minimum base expectation of all people and her lack of child raping doesn't make her or the CO2 emissions any better. you don't get carbon credits for not raping kids!

1

Anonymous #1 1w

maybe your pop-tok rotted brain would understand if i framed it like this: "matt healy might be a slimeball but at least he's not in the epstein files. you gotta give him kudos for that!" see how the two issues have no relation, and how his lack of presence in the pedo files bears no weight on whether or not he's a slimeball? you see how this framework aims to downplay one issue by comparing it to a drastically worse one? this is child brained nonsense

1

Anonymous OP 1w

that's not what i said, i have not once in my comments said anything about her not raping a child is something to give her props for like ik that's bare minimum also i didn't make the post you replied to

0

Anonymous #1 1w

exactly. like i said, you failed miserably to comprehend the very obvious point of this post, which is about not needing to give her kudos for not raping kids (which the original post asserts we should), and started a *different* argument about her carbon emissions. if you want to defend an exploitative billionaire's excessive resource consumption do it under a different post because that's NOT the point of this post. her not being in the files does NOT absolve her of any other wrongdoings. jfc

1

Anonymous #2 1w

so you think we should be giving props and back pats to people for not raping kids? if that's not what you think, then not even you think what they're saying is "kind of valid" because that's what they're fucking saying. get that through your head. they're saying we should praise people for not raping kids. idgaf who it is. it could be mr fucking rogers. that is not a behavior to be praised it is a behavior to be EXPECTED

1

Anonymous #2 1w

and it's a clear indication that you exist in a pop-media bubble that you think the only person getting shredded for going to the island is epstein. careers have ended, people have fled the country, marriages have failed, etc. over this

1

Anonymous OP 1w

i quite literally said i do not think she should be getting applauded for not being on the island because that is below bare minimum if you could maybe read before speaking, i am saying she should not be getting MORE hate online than people who were ACTUALLY on the island, i am not saying she shouldn’t receive hate for valid things, but people literally use violent hate speech against her for simply making pop music, and no, there are thousands of people who have not and will never face

2

Anonymous OP 1w

repercussions for their actions on the island and if you think that every person has then you are absolutely delusional and not understanding the disgusting patriarchy we live under, our own president was there and continues to in fact be our president, please read before you speak

4

Anonymous OP 1w

no the fuck it's not what i said also the person who made that post you replied to also didn't "praise" her for that like at this point just say you don't like taylor and move the fuck on

2

Anonymous #2 1w

the post i'm arguing against is literally saying to give her "props" (which is synonymous with praise and you can argue with merriam-webster about that) for not going to his island dumbing it down 4 u: THIS post and the post it is in RESPONSE TO are about PRAISING SWIFT FOR NOT RAPING KIDS if you want to argue about whether or not she gets too much hate for her music TAKE IT SOMEWHERE ELSE. THAT IS NOT FUCKING RELEVANT TO MY ARGUMENT THAT THIS IS NOT WORTHY OF "PROPS"

3

Anonymous #1 1w

like i said, bird brain, it could be mr fucking rogers (a man i adored) and the argument would be the same. saying you shouldn't praise celebs for not being pedos is not swift hate, you parasocial goober

1

Anonymous #2 1w

your ENTIRE argument is a straw man. and i don't care if your parasocial mommy gets a lot of hate! she still doesn't deserve praise for not being a pedo, which is the ONLY argument being made here. you're arguing and shadow boxing with ghosts!

3

Anonymous OP 1w

hence why i said “KIND of valid”, the post and idea has nuance, at this point you are purposefully being dense and arguing just to argue, mind you my initial comment wasn’t even me trying to argue with you but i guess you’re having an angry day 🤭, i simply was adding more to the conversation which is what normal people do and honestly didnt expect you to get riled up over it, my point completely stands and there’s actually no room to argue against it

0

Anonymous OP 1w

but what i did argue with is you saying ppl on the island are getting what they deserved which is so factually incorrect, anyways hope u have a better day than u deserve

0

Anonymous #3 1w

What I've gotten from this post is that Swift apologists are conversationally challenged

1

Anonymous #2 1w

you desperately need to improve your reading/comprehension skills and your ability to retain information including what YOU say YOU said people were "fully" keeping their mouths shut about other visitors, to which i replied saying if you think the only person getting shredded is her you're in a media bubble. i NEVER said they got what they deserved (they deserve so much worse than the "hate" that you're so fixated on) NOR that every perpetrator is being punished. caveman brain istg

1

Anonymous #2 1w

you have no point either. in fact you immediately conceded the only weak ass point you tried and failed to make 🤭 you said their point was kind of valid, but their point is that people deserve praise for not raping kids, which even you disagreed with

1

Anonymous #2 1w

you literally do not have a single RELEVANT argument. #3 summarized it perfectly. you're straw manning and shadow boxing. i am making one singular point and you're desperately trying to shift the goalposts to a discussion about the severity of hate when the idea being challenged is whether or not people DESERVE PROPS FOR NOT RAPING KIDS

2

Anonymous #3 1w

conversationally, intellectually and emotionally challenged

1

Anonymous OP 1w

oh brother, it’s in one ear out the other with you, bye mama

0

Anonymous #2 1w

thank GOD

3

Anonymous OP 1w

omg are you fucking stupid? listen now: i am NOT praising her for not raping kids that's bare fucking minimum. second thing, my comment was only about the point about her carbon emissions. got it now?

-1

Anonymous #3 1w

says you and you don't even have one good point

-1