Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
I grieve what this country could have been if Kamala was elected. Instead we have the pedo party, started wars, and everything is so beyond expensive
upvote 19 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

The genocide in Gaza was started under Biden. But I agree the war in Iran wouldn’t have started and we’d be in a much better economic situation.

upvote 9 downvote
🐘
Anonymous 2w

Thank god she was not elected. Our country would have been ruined.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

The war may have not started, but she would’ve let in all the illegal immigrants and the economy would’ve gotten worse with that. Trump needs to do something about this war, he could end it rn if he wanted

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

lmao worse than the doubling of almost all prices? over your racist dog whistle? tell me how your (fake) claim of letting in more illegal immigrants would cause prices to hike

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Basic economics. More people, less food, higher prices. More people, less houses, higher prices.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Advanced economics: - more people => profitable farms => more food and distributed wealth - build more houses, don’t tariff basic building materials => more jobs and lower prices

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

All of this happened and supposedly Trumps fixing the immigration problem according to MAGA

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Which is true in theory, but with illegal immigration, you know, people that shouldn’t be here regardless, farms and businesses pay these people pennies to the dollar bc they’re illegal which completely stagnates wages and doesn’t distribute wealth at all. You can build more homes, but houses are known for not being as good as they used to be, they might as well be slingshots with how much potential energy they have. And they still have problems that if you pay too much money, more than a house

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Is worth, these problems shouldn’t even be thought of at all. The only people that illegal immigration helps are the billionaire businesses and elite class. Which the people that support illegal immigration are against completely. They are a net drain to our society and they shouldn’t be here. They don’t share our values, they don’t learn our language, they make their own cloistered communities, and they don’t want what’s best for America. They aren’t Americans.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

He hasn’t fixed it completely, but he’s done the most out of anyone in history, so it’s a start. He’s too much of a pussy to actually do what the law allows him to do bc of how it may look to the public. If you want to forcibly take people out, it isn’t gonna look good, but you have to be willing to do it anyway.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Most out of anyone in history. More people exist now, obviously that’s going to change how much can get done. The law doesn’t let you just round people up without the judicial process happening

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Let me ask you, what is the judicial process in this context? What is the judicial process pertaining to illegals.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

They go to an immigration court, the court hears the govs reasoning for why or what’s causing their ask for deportation, a removal hearing occurs which by the way is required not even a president can take away someone’s removal hearing.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

the immigration judge must address any claim that the individual DHS seeks to remove is a U.S. citizen. Then, the immigration judge determines if the immigrant is removable under the law for the reasons the government claims. Immigrants can argue that they should stay even if they entered illegally and sometimes the judge gives them legal status because it’s not just a gov persecution opportunity, it’s also a chance for whoever is in that situation to make their case why they’re beneficial

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Now, since you asked. Without looking it up, under what article is an immigrant granted hearings like removal hearings?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

No idea. But the point I’m trying to make is that they can get all these hearings, but the judicial process is that they get out. Our justice system gets them out bc it’s the law. They aren’t supposed to be here. Even some U.S. citizens should be deported, in my opinion. People that have immigrated here, took an oath, and defile that oath every day.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

No it’s not, you’d know if you knew anything about this process. So you don’t know which article. Again, without looking it up Whats the legal recourse if an illegal immigrant has proven that the government has persecuted them?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

It literally is. It’s not a criminal charge to be here, but the legal thing to do in that situation is deportation. These people aren’t supposed to be here. They come here specifically for money reasons. They don’t care about becoming American. The only reason they’re here is to be a voting block.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Again, I don’t know, and I don’t really care. They persecute all Americans by being here. We have no obligation to take care of illegals. We don’t have an obligation to take in people if we don’t want to, and we don’t have the obligation to take care of the world.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Name 3 legal possibilities that stem from removal hearings. What determinations? You not caring doesn’t make the facts go away.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

You’re right, bc you’re prolly spewing lies out of your mouth rn bc that’s what people that believe in illegal immigration do. You’re trying to obfuscate the process as much as possible to get me to doubt myself. What, the law is gonna say it’s okay for an illegal immigrant to stay here for what? Wdym by if the government “persecuted” them? They aren’t supposed to be here. They aren’t under the law. The whole reason they’re here and they don’t apply to be an American is bc they don’t want

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

To be under the law, so the protections of the law don’t apply to them. The judicial process is to see if they’re here, legally, if they’re a citizen, and to deport them if they’re not. Stop trying to make it confusing when it’s not.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

3 legal possibilities. Go ahead. This is why you have the opinion you have, you don’t know anything. You think that you can just pretend it doesn’t exist and it’ll go away.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Lmao. When it’s literally illegal for them to be here? I don’t need to know anything about the system to know that they shouldn’t be here. There are no positives that come with illegal immigration.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

You don’t need to know the law when you’re complaining about legality?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Dude. It’s in the name. Illegal immigrant. It’s obviously illegal for them to be here. Illegal immigrants being here only hurts Americans. Illegals look for ways to completely fuck over actual Americans. Trump is too much of a pussy to just do what he said he was gonna do. I don’t care how it looks. Every “big situation surrounding illegals since trump took office has all been a lie to purposefully misinform the people and to radicalize people. I just want people to go through the proper channels

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

To become an American. I don’t care about legal immigrants. My parents immigrated here, but they actually did what you’re supposed to do. The vast majority of the reason illegals are here is to fuck over the tax payer. They aren’t escaping war or anything like how people are claiming.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

So when you voted for Trump your idea was that he would just not care about the law, the same way you’re complaining about immigrants not caring?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Lmao. You saying that makes me think you legit know nothing about the law. I voted for him bc I thought he was gonna use the law the way it was intended to do what I want. He could’ve employed the insurrection act multiple times on the “peaceful protestors.” He could be arresting people that are threatening to kill him, bc people do that all the time, but he doesn’t. The reason America is in chaos rn is bc he isn’t enforcing the law. Criminals are running loose bc they think they’re above the la

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

I asked you to name 3 things that can happen from removal hearings and you said I was making it confusing lol. So you voted for a guy who broke the law, because you don’t like when people break the law?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Bc you are. The process is if they’re illegal, they get deported. There is no helping them out so they can stay here unless the judge is an activist fuck that should be disbarred. I’m not saying that he’s perfect, he needs to be under the law too, but don’t seriously say that people on the left don’t do the same shit. But you’re only gonna say it’s bad when trump does something

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Apparently the law is confusing to you then. Yes or no, you voted for someone who broke the law, because you don’t like when people break the law when it comes to immigration?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

It’s not confusing me. I voted for someone who broke the law, but so did you bc I assume you voted for Biden or Hillary or any of them. I hate that. Obviously. All politicians break the law somehow, so do citizens. And they all need to be held accountable.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

What crime was Biden convicted for? So you don’t care about the law then lol. You cherry pick what laws are okay to break You’ll vote for someone to run our country who breaks laws but get offended when others do it? Your standards aren’t consistent.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

You think that democrats don’t break the law bc they haven’t been convicted? You know all politicians do something.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

I’m asking you when he was convicted. Should be easy, I can tell you when the guy you voted for was. Why is it good to support criminals?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Lmao. Yeah I’m not playing this game with you. You know democrats do the same shit. You know trumps convictions were bc of activist liberal judges. You know both sides do the same shit.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

The game is me telling you to substantiate your argument with a single fact lol. Prove that the jury was biased then. I’ll wait for you to avoid showing any proof again. You don’t care about the law; even when the law says that he was legally guilty you ignore that lol.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Judges don’t determine guilt in a jury trial case. Something else you must not know.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

You’re arguing that the law protects illegal immigrants and your view is that illegal people should be able to stay. You’re saying you care about the law? You didn’t say anything about me saying that trump could invoke the insurrection act on people you support, the “protestors” bc people throwing rocks and bricks and other stuff at Ice officers totally isn’t breaking the law. It’s not like obstructing federal officers is a crime!

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

You’re arguing a jury trial was rigged because a judge was leftist without proof. Even when the law is clear you pretend it was wrong. You don’t care about the law. Prove Trumps trial was rigged. I’m waiting.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> last_republican_on_yikyak 2w

more or less destroyed than it is now? because it really can’t get much worse than this

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

If the genocide in Gaza started under Biden, why was Reagan famous for calling out the human rights abuses committed by Israel lmao?

upvote 8 downvote