If you disagree, you’re welcome to DM and voice your opinion. I just think you (man or woman) shouldn’t be able to marry a man or woman for their money then just divorce and take it
I agree up until adultery. I think whoever the cheating partner is should get less than what they put in because they themselves cited to do something that was going to hurt their partner.
2
Anonymous4w
Men shouldn’t get 50% if they divorce their wives, or if their wives divorce them. My stance personally.
1
Anonymous#14w
I don’t think cause matters. It shouldn’t be automatic
0
Anonymous#24w
Yes. It goes both ways
1
AnonymousOP4w
I mean in general.
1
Anonymous#24w
So they deserve less simply because of their anatomy?
1
AnonymousOP4w
It 100% matters. Men add nothing of value to most relationships. They shouldn’t be entitled to free money or assets.
1
AnonymousOP4w
I didn’t say that. I said they add nothing of value. We should not be giving any form of DEI type policies or actions to any group. You’d agree?
1
Anonymous#24w
Just simply financially, are woman primary providers in most relationships?
1
Anonymous#24w
I don’t think DEI policies or free handouts are a good thing. That’s why I don’t think women can just marry a rich guy then divorce him the next week and take half. Nor should men be able to do the reverse
1
AnonymousOP4w
Men should be able to contribute to relationships more effectively if they want more. That’s just stats.
1
Anonymous#24w
Please provide the stats
1
Anonymous#24w
What would the ideal contribution be? What would men need to contribute to receive at least 51% of the money in the divorce if he makes 100% of the money?