Anonymous #1 1w

I fear it’s an early sign of the radicalization as a result of Kirk’s murder

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Agreed. Twitter was insane the other day

1

Anonymous #1 1w

True. I think this was the straw that broke the camels back in a lot of ways

1

Anonymous #2 1w

And you and people like you are why he will just continue to grow and get bigger.

-2

Anonymous #2 1w

This attitude is exactly the problem and exactly what is responsible for radicalizing countless numbers of young people

0

Anonymous OP 1w

The only people that are radicalizing others are conservative republicans.

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Incorrect the amount of posts and videos of people who were liberal going around who are absolutely appalled(me as well) by the radicals on the left celebrating his death are monsters and that they can’t be associated with this idolization of political violence, has frankly been astonishing. People like you are a hundred times worse than CK ever was and are the reason the Overton Window is going to continue to shift so drastically

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Lmao you aren't a liberal. Liberals wouldnt be sad that a facist died.

0

Anonymous #2 1w

He literally was the antithesis of a fascist you dullard. His entire platform was built on debate and having conversations with those you don’t agree with. For someone who claims to be on the side that is worried about the ‘death’ of intellectualism you don’t seem to be that intelligent

6

Anonymous OP 1w

Sure, ok. Keep telling yourself that.

0

Anonymous #2 1w

When did the definition of fascism change to advocating for free speech and open debate of ideas? He literally was assassinated doing a tour where all he was doing was debating people about anything they wanted. Somehow the man who advocated for free speech and freedom of ideas is the fascist not the people supporting his killing? Give me a break you absolute clown

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Epic times, actually. Shitlibs can seethe about it tho

0

Anonymous #2 1w

This level of delusion is playing right into our hands. I’m glad you freaks are acting like this lmao

5

Anonymous #2 1w

you just got so cooked LMAOOOO😭😭😭😭

3

Anonymous OP 1w

I really hope that if you’re really as against fascism as you say that this helps you realize that’s the side you’re on.

1

Anonymous #5 1w

I agree but do you think silencing the moderate will make people more moderate or do you think it will drive people to a further extreme? Killing the moderates is how you are given the extremists and that’s exactly what is happening

1

Anonymous OP 6d

I agreed with u until this. Political violence is everywhere. It’s not getting coverage for healthcare. It’s dying on the street from cold. Charlie Kirk’s rhetoric was inherently violent to virtually every marginal group, and ignoring that fact HAS ALREADY done more harm to this country than ever. Liberals compromising and acting like you are what move that Overton window. If we accept these kinds of ideas as normal and ok, you get the current fascist mvmt we have right now.

0

Anonymous OP 6d

CK didn’t use his debates as an open opportunity and he did not display ideas equally. If you notice in the things he puts out, he has complete editorial control, keeping what he wants and cutting what he doesn’t. He was someone that had trained in debate for years arguing with college kids that likely had no experience debating before.His platform was used to make the fascist standpoint seem like a logical one, and libs like u are falling for it unfortunately.

0

Anonymous OP 6d

Last one bc u pissed me off- he absolutely did not believe in open ideas, he was against things like gay marriage, trans people, black liberation. If you cannot see that the man was a fascist, I wonder if you also can’t see that our gov is fascist rn as well as

0

Anonymous #1 6d

Being against trans people, gay marriage, and black liberation does not make you a fascist. You can’t just call everyone you disagree with a fascist and then use it to excuse their murder. The majority of his popular clips were from when he was 18-early 20s debating people of the same age so idk what this ‘trained in years of debate’ thing is. Even when he debated people who were not college students the outcome was still relatively the same.

1

Anonymous #1 6d

People that are now switching sides aren’t necessarily accepting those ideas they are just rejecting the vilification of people that the left dosent agree with and the glorification of political violence. It’s not compromising to want to be on the side of history that dosent burn down cities in the name of a drug addicted felon and assassinate their political opponents in loo of defending their ideas.

1

Anonymous OP 6d

Oh so ur literally one of them nvm what am I doing

0

Anonymous #1 6d

No you’re literally just saying that because someone disagrees with what you think are things that everyone should agree with, that they are a fascist. I agree that those are things that should be supported but just because someone dosent support them does not mean that they are a fascist and that rhetoric is exactly what has caused increased division and an increase in political violence over the past 8 ish years.

0

Anonymous OP 5d

You believe that the “left” burned down cities for a quote “drug addicted felon” which is the same lie that Kirk used to do his racism. The actual reason is because a police officer thought he had the authority to kneel on someone’s neck for 9 mins and kill him. I would encourage you to look into fascism and do some critical thinking about our government and the mvmt behind it you seem a little blind to history

0

Anonymous #1 5d

I never argued the government wasn’t fascist you’re just sitting over here calling Kirk a fascist and a racist when I bet you’ve never actually listened to anything he’s said and have only watched clips. I agree Floyd should not have died and that he was brutalized by that cop but instead of having peaceful protests or holding vigils, it was instead elected to riot, loot, and burn down cities. Ask yourself why does the right not do the same?

1

Anonymous #1 5d

Why is only one side perpetuating violence in the name of ‘just basic empathy’ ? And just because I agree that Floyd did not deserve to die and that cop should rot in jail dosent mean that he wasn’t a drug addicted felon, which he was. There was at least 10 other cases of police brutality that would have served as a better flagship if everyone was itching to burn down cities and hand out gold caskets.

1