Anonymous #3 13w

Me when I'm living under a rock

5

Anonymous OP 13w

Wow you’re a dick the guy just asked a question

11

Anonymous #3 13w

It’s anti trump. Mainly his abuse of power and disregard for checks and balances

15

Anonymous #2 13w

In reality it showed this country is united against its shit president. But read into it as you wish

66

Anonymous #4 13w

Yes the country is united except for the majority of counties that turned red and voted for him and will likely continue to be red for midterms and into the next election. I am also not ‘reading into it’ it was literally funded by George soros and Christy Walton, who both obviously have many things to gain personally from organizing against Trump

-5

Anonymous #2 13w

I think 90% of it isn’t funded by anything. The vast majority just walked. Doesn’t cost much to do that. I paid $2.50 in bus fair to participate on my way to work. That’s about it. Even if they ran the whole thing the important part remains the sheer volume of people in 2000+ different parts of the country

43

Anonymous #4 13w

And if there is a portion of the 1% that is anti trump I’ll take it. Surprising with his insane tax breaks for the elite

28

Anonymous #4 13w

The website and organization of the protests by city as well as advertiseing were funded by christy Walton, heir to the Walmart empire. Why? Well ask yourself where Walmart gets their merchandise. Soros also gave 2.1B through NGOs, he is also against Trump due to the doge spending and current investigations into him embezzling taxpayer money through these NGOs. You protest a nonexistent king at the whim of people richer and more powerful than the man you are protesting.

-4

Anonymous #4 13w

The planned minnesota protests had also received money that was traced back to the CCP through walz and his NGOs, but obviously those were cancelled after the assassinations.

-3

Anonymous #2 13w

I protest the president bc of his blatant disregard for the constitution and everything this democracy stands for. He is a joke of a president and the whole world is laughing at him and us. These are the facts of the situation. Anyone can sponsor it in our capitalistic society and it doesn’t take away from the fact he must be removed from office in 2026

12

Anonymous #5 13w

It was a horrible move politically but it’s how it works and has worked for many elections

3

Anonymous #4 13w

Can you elaborate on his blatant disregard for the constitution? I would say for a joke of a president he has been doing pretty well so far

0

Anonymous #4 13w

But it’s not how it works 🥀 the people decide who represents their party in the primary elections and by bypassing that vote they took the democratic American’s ability to choose a candidate.

6

Well then I guess we will just have to see if it’s enough seats to flip the either part of the legislative branch

-2

Interesting well hopefully everything important gets pushed through before then

-2

The house may flip last midterms didn’t go well for him but the senate will definitely not. There could be a chance the house dosent flip pending his approval rating I’m thinking but who knows

-1

Anonymous #5 13w

It’s the law. Idk what to tell ya. Been that way. I agree it’s stupid but it didn’t break any laws

3

Anonymous #5 13w

Doesn’t change the fact that trump hasn’t given a single fuck about checks and balances since he came back into office

1

Anonymous #4 13w

It literally isn’t the law bro, they just threw all their support behind Kamala and then the delegates chose her without a primary, what law are you referring to 😭😭

5

Anonymous #2 13w

He has not been doing well at all. He has lied and failed to accomplish anything he said he would, except for what was outlined in project 2025. He has ignored the constitution on multiple occasions and keeps going over congress and acting like a dictator with all the power. Judges and courts block his actions because they are illegal and he goes and fires those people

12

Anonymous #10 13w

The economy is better for the middle class consumer, he is reforming the FDA and food safety requirements, our border is actually being enforced, wages overall have increased as well as job growth, inflation has decreased, procreation efforts I.e. Trump accounts for children born 2025-2028, and not to mention doge, I think that overall there has been much more good for the American people then bad

0

Anonymous #2 13w

A better economy for the middle and upper class, and let’s remember the vast majority of Americans at this point are lower class. Reforming the FDA by removing it and not installing a successor. Wage increase was negligible, job growth has decreased in many corporate settings because of them going bankrupt or moving over seas, doge has blitzed and burnt countless government agencies and programs with no regard for the consequences, all I see are either misinformation, lies or negative things?

6

Anonymous #2 13w

Even if you take these specifically as net positives, the total net is still negative considering he’s deporting legal immigrants, detaining and mistreating natural citizens, ignoring lawful court orders, illegally implementing and enforcing executive orders as laws or rules, using his power to enrich himself and his friends, regressing environmental standards and overlook, he’s literally the most corrupt president in our history and a white nationalist at the same time. But bow to you king 🙄

8

Anonymous #11 13w

i don't understand how they think any of that shit is good. he's been a horrendous president, worst than his first time around.

4

Anonymous #2 13w

Oligarchs are aristocrats, the king’s court, Trump is the king, there are far more oligarchs supporting Trump than opposing him But yes, they’re bad too, but this is not a case of us being their pawn but one of our interests happening to align on this one issue, on other issues we can and should oppose them just as readily

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Democrats gained seats in the house in 2024, just not enough for a majority, and the party out of power virtually always gains seats in the midterms. They’re not gonna continue to be red

3

Anonymous #2 13w

The house will flip, Democrats already gained in the house in 2024 and he was much more popular then than now, the Senate isn’t a great map for Democrats so it probably won’t flip but there’s a decent chance Dems will gain seats

3

Anonymous #4 13w

And with you actually believing that, you’re being controlled by the ones who believe they are kings. You are their slave. Look outside mainstream news and educate yourself.

5

Anonymous #14 13w

Idk man he’s pretty popular

1

Anonymous #11 13w

Are those aggregates? (Which both say something separate)

1

Anonymous #9 13w

Yup, and both disagree with you 🤓

5

Anonymous #11 13w

Well obviously because I used a poll not an aggregate of polls, but even 44% is still pretty popular. Also im not sure about his approval rating last year being lower than currently

-1

Anonymous #11 13w

I’d consider an aggregate slightly more trustworthy than an individual poll, and 44% isn’t that popular compared to what republicans are claiming. I’ve heard numbers as high as 60% approval from Fox and other right news just a couple weeks ago, lying through their teeth

1

Anonymous #9 13w

It isn’t necessary law but there’s been a transparent precedent set for situations like these and they seemingly followed it to the T

1

Anonymous #11 13w

Ultimately the parties have total control over the nominees and everything, I want that changed but they didn’t do anything illegal or morally questionable outside of still fielding a legal and valid nominee, otherwise there wouldn’t have been much of an election race lol

1

Anonymous #11 13w

Maybe not total control over everything that was an exaggeration but you know what I was getting at lol

1

Anonymous #16 13w

Except that he’s a liar, a fraud, and a womanizer

1

Anonymous #11 13w

under Trump, inflation has cooled to around 2% and is continuing to drop, real wages are rising, and job growth especially for native-born workers(majorly important) has steadily improved. The doge reforms are trimming bloated bureaucracy and redirecting resources to frontline services like wildfire response and the rehired CDC team. The FDA wasn’t eliminated, its roles are being restructured for speed and efficiency, especially in drug approvals. The government needed change and change arrived

3

Anonymous #11 13w

Executive orders are standard. Trump’s are legally challenged like any president’s this isn’t new or illegal, it’s part of checks and balances. Court order disputes don’t equal defiance. Legal processes are active, and rulings are being reviewed, not blatantly ignored or disobeyed. His environmental policy changes focus on energy and job growth. rollback ≠ regression.

3

Anonymous #11 13w

Claims of corruption and racism are widely repeated but never proven in court. You refuse to acknowledge the dog and pony show that has been ran on Trump since the beginning. Years of unbearable scrutiny has produced no criminal conviction. The economy is rebounding: inflation is down, wages up, native-born job growth strong. That benefits working Americans directly and that’s what most Americans care about.

3

Anonymous #14 13w

This is so stupid so when it’s oligarchs against Trump their ‘values’ just happen to align with yours and it has nothing to do with them hemorrhaging billions? But when a billionaire helps Trump, say musk for example, it is a miscarriage of justice and completely unacceptable in any capacity. Yet you don’t mind George soros using taxpayer money to fund whatever he pleases? You’re a fucking joke

3

Anonymous #2 13w

Rollback IS regression when it comes to the environment considering it’s an active crisis. He’s ignoring court orders and not disputing them, his lawyers and any put on stand are feigning ignorance of information they HAVE to know, executive orders aren’t policies but more so a request for agencies to accommodate or not. If he wants concrete change he HAS to go through the proper systems

1

Anonymous #11 13w

Idk what you mean by “real wages”, DOGE used extremely questionable legal authority to blitzkrieg legally formed and operating agencies and policies so I don’t see how that’s a positive for you guys sure they saved a fraction of what they wanted to and put that money right back into something stupid yayyy. Dude he’s always been a corrupt businessman look at his history he stole his 16 year old nieces millions of $ of inheritance money and then counter sued her

1

Anonymous #11 13w

He’s on record said multiple racist remarks as well to black women and Latino people in general. He’s weaseled himself out of every legal scrutiny through his inherited fortune, which he’s bankrupted on multiple times mind you. He’s literally a failure of a businessman that’s only rich because he let other people handle his money. He’s made misogynistic remarks to women all his life, he’s disrespected veterans and active service men on air and in person. His policies are fascist aligning

1

Anonymous #2 13w

I mean isn’t it obvious, if you support this vile person with vile policies, I’ll assume you support their policies too? I’m not gonna like someone who supports policies like that, so idk what you mean by that either? If anything the right is being hypocritical by dying on this hill, if what George soros did was so bad why is what Elon did ok? It goes right back around to you too lmao

1

Anonymous #11 13w

Executive orders are not a request lol. And would you be any less opposed if these things were actually signed into law? I think you’d be more outraged? At least with the executive orders the next time a blue president rolls in there they can just be repealed easily with no problems. Not to mention most of his environmental rollback is regulations that never should’ve been implemented in the first place (take NEPA reform, wood stove emissions, redundant methane rules etc) some of it is bad tho.

1

Anonymous #11 13w

Real wages is the amount of purchasing power your wage has. So not just like raising minimum wage by $2 but how much you can do with your wage based on economic conditions. As for doge it was not legally questionable and as an executive department they were legally allowed to nuke USAID(another executive department) and I hope they continue to get rid of unnecessary aspects of bureaucracy. What something stupid are you talking about?

0

Anonymous #11 13w

Bro our country has almost exclusively had old white men run it, they have all been racist and misogynistic (minus Obama on the racism).You remember our last president right? And what you wanna peg Trump on is saying that you just feel that he’s corrupt and racist? When you get me Biden or like Nixon level proof then throw that shit around. I like how your only retort is that he is rich so he’s just simply weaseled his way out of everything, or absolutely bonkers thought maybe he’s not corrupt!

0

Anonymous #11 13w

‘Fascist aligning’ come on dawg you can do better then that. Tell me which policies give me something concrete here please I’m dying at all your hearsay. As for soros he’s been using taxpayer money funneled into NGOs to elect democratic candidates for decades and it’s fucking ridiculous, he has no shame and the only thing that is in it for him is personal gain from scraping off the top of those taxpayer funds. Elon didn’t steal taxpayer money to get people he liked elected? He just donated w his

0

Anonymous #11 13w

Also the soros comment was for 14 but you can continue to jump in on it if you want but soros is a POS who’s been stealing from citizens since he got involved in politics

0

Anonymous #2 13w

And Trump isn’t? Get a grip dude and get your nose out of trumps public hairs

3

Anonymous #2 13w

The creation of DOGE was legally questionable because it was done by executive action and not an act of Congress

2

Anonymous #11 13w

Pubic autocorrect has it out for me ffs ;-;

1

Anonymous #2 13w

It’s wild that you’re trying to argue Trump isn’t corrupt when Trump wouldn’t even argue he isn’t corrupt, he wants stuff like the plane gift from Qatar so publicly and publicly talking about countries giving him money and stuff using corruption as a deliberate public part of his foreign policy, let alone his cryptocurrency that allows any world leader or corporation to bribe him as much money as they want without the public knowing who they are Trump does not pretend to not be corrupt…

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Elon Musk got rich from government subsidies and contracts, he got rich in the first place of taxpayer money and he donated so much to Trump in part in exchange for being given many more contracts and more of our money

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Soros is such a minor player in the rich people throwing their money around in politics, all the billionaires are POS your focus on that particular one is a huge distraction from the larger dynamic

1

Anonymous #14 13w

Soros is a minor player but he’s also the one that everyone chooses to ignore when government corruption is brought up. Elon musk was rich before government contracts, and note that without him our space program would be nonexistent. I also do not believe that was why he donated to Trump as he would be receiving the contracts regardless. The plane was def sus I’ll give you that but I wouldn’t say he’s even in top 15 most corrupt tho Also do you know how a crypto currency works?

0

Anonymous #11 13w

Trump isn’t what? Scraping taxpayer funds off the top? Maybe I mean he dosent take a salary but im sure he’s skimmed some somehow just like every president, senator, councilperson etc. has all over the country id rather keep skimming tax payer dollars to the politicians tho instead of third parties. Of course that’s unrealistic bc our system is fucked beyond belief but I do not think Trump is a problem in that regard in the grand scheme of things

0

Anonymous #2 13w

Soros probably gets more attention than any other megadonor other than Musk, despite being nowhere close toy he second biggest donor, and not having direct mentorship of major political figures like Peter Thiel has with JD Vance And almost all Musk’s companies—Tesla, SpaceX, the Boring Company, etc—got big and made most of their money thanks to government subsidies, tax credits, and contracts Yes, Musk was wealthy before but the bulk of his wealth is thanks to those contracts

0

Anonymous #2 13w

And we would still have a space program without SpaceX, the money that goes to SpaceX would just go to NASA instead

0

Anonymous #2 13w

The plane isn’t “sus,” there is nothing to be suspicious of, Trump is blatantly saying he’ll give favors in exchange for money and gifts. At that Middle East summit he was talking about how much money the crown prince of Saudi Arabia is making. Trump’s whole schtick is doing all those corrupt things the other politicians do turned up to 11 and not even hiding it because he knows other politicians won’t go after his corruption because they’d have to endanger their own in the process

0

Anonymous #14 13w

When you frame it that way sure but i think comparing him offering a service that the government/the people, want or need like the tunnel digging machine, or being put it an advantageous situation with Tesla due to and EV mandate or emissions tax in California makes a lot more sense then literally just getting funneled money like soros does for nothing other then attempting to get more democrats elected. I think thiel is a POS too for the record and I think Palantir is an awful idea

1

Anonymous #14 13w

Elon single handily revived nasa dude idk if you just weren’t paying attention before spacex or maybe you’re younger then i am but nasa was on the verge of being entirely deconstructed and Elon basically stimulated interest in it and pulled it from the grave nearly

1

Anonymous #14 13w

The plane hasn’t even been actually transferred yet if it is it will be transferred to the Air Force not to Trump. Apparently the deal was done at the recommendation of Boeing since they are apparently unable to provide a new Air Force 1 craft for like 2 years. So actually I changed my mind plane is not sus.

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Anytime you see George Soros blamed its complete conspiracy nonsense disinformation. Don’t be a lemming believing what you read in social media

1

Anonymous #21 13w

Blamed for what taking tax payer dollars? There is a very clear and defined paper trail showing the money he gets funneled through NGOs and then gives to exclusively democratic campaigns or organizing anti Trump events

0

Anonymous #2 13w

Most of these billionaires get taxpayer dollars that they use to influence politics, Soros isn’t even the biggest one

1