
So pointing out youâre cool with worshipping a pedo is insane. Thatâs no joke and itâs interesting that thatâs how you justify it, his proven base is slow adults, racists and pedos, no joke which are you, Hint? Most are at least two of those- again not a joke - put yourself on a list
When youâre in a position where you pose the highest chance of threat to agents by moving your vehicle, and when such agentsâ assumptions will be, typically, threat, they act. I think it was too in the moment to consider that, which is why I said it kind of isnât on her, nor would it be on agents whose assumption is necessary
It doesnât matter if she posed a threat or not? What the hell are you on about? You were literally just saying they had the right to shoot her because she posed a threat to them. So youâre saying it doesnât matter whether she posed a threat or not, it was justified of them to murder her either way? What is wrong with you? Youâre saying an innocent womanâs murder is justified even if she didnât pose a threat. Youâre either a bootlicker or youâre just plain stupid. You need some serious help.
You need to work on reading comprehension. Even if she wasnât âactuallyâ a threat, she posed a threat. If you look at the video, her tire spin before moving was the extremely throttled. If it werenât for the ice, she wouldâve hit ICE. The agent did suffer injury, so there was damage, and I wouldnât blame them for reacting to that.