Anonymous #2 1w

They just passed the law yesterday. They’re advertising it as “death penalty for terrorist attacks” but the language in the bill is vague and we know they’re gonna start executing people indiscriminately

12

Anonymous #4 1w

“These places are shitty and backwards, therefore escalating genocide is okay.” You’re sick in the head.

15

Anonymous #3 1w

Ok so half of this is made up, got it

-4

Anonymous #2 1w

Bro GTFO with that. We watched as they happily rape and mutilate Palestinians and Lebanese and riot when told they’re not allowed to do so, is it so hard to believe they’re about to start indiscriminately murdering when they say they’re gonna do it?! Y’all truly are hopeless I guess

8

Anonymous #4 1w

Good argument. Doesn’t make Israel’s actions right but it does falsify the claim that’s Israel has the first laws of this nature since the nazi’s

11

Anonymous #4 1w

I’m assuming that in this wording race = ethnicity, which is different from religion. Don’t defend this.

0

Anonymous #3 1w

What proof Hamas raped, killed, and mutilated women, put children in ovens that were on, destroyed families and even strangled infants and your coming for the one Jewish state who is only trying to defend their people from terrorists If you believe they are killing random people cause why not then your delusional and you believe in the propaganda like the next person and can’t use your eyes to actually read the news and only listens to whatever social media says and only actually find sources

3

Anonymous #6 1w

I literally said not for race but for religion, not race, because the blasphemy law I was talking about discriminates on bases of religion but it’s still just as bad as something discriminating on race because it still discriminates based on a group. And what do you mean “don’t defend this” it’s a death penalty for terrorist many countries have it. Even many Islamic countries have it, they even have death penalty for more minor things like drugs. Why are you acting like it’s out of the ordinary

-3

Anonymous #4 1w

https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-death-penalty-bill-knesset-ben-gvir-c67c1c14f218a4d67ed3d5011cd5cf8d

8

Anonymous #7 1w

You have to show evidence for them to believe you. I know this happened but they aren’t going to believe you so you are going have to link them to news articles or other sources of evidence

7

Anonymous #8 1w

I can’t seem to access the link can you resend it

3

Anonymous #4 1w

the mandated death penalty exclusively targets palestinians. israelis get additional leniency. this is absolutely, one hundred percent a death penalty for one ethnic group and not the other

14

Anonymous #4 1w

The news articles where they talk about the strangling of the Bibas boys with their bear hands no one should have to show proof for people to believe. If people are too dumb and want to believe what is easier than what is actually the truth and believe the propaganda have at it as I can’t say anything that would change your minds

4

Anonymous #8 1w

Thanks for showing me this, I must say this is quite an unfair law

4

Anonymous #8 1w

I mean the law sucks and the israeli government is fucked but i will say that they are far from the only place to have laws like this. Citizens have more leniency within their nation of origin in most places

-2

Anonymous #1 1w

Zio is a slur coined by David Duke

3

Anonymous #9 1w

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2026/3/31/whats-israels-death-penalty-law-that-only-applies-to-palestinians It’s quite literally colony law now.

1

Anonymous #9 1w

I really don’t care if it insults colonists. I’m tired of them trying to lump themselves in with Jews and hiding behind antisemitism when they’re the most antisemitic hate group there is.

15

Anonymous #1 1w

The word zios is insulting to Jews though. It is literally a slur directed against all Jews

-8

Anonymous #1 1w

No, it applies in 30 days “if it survives legal challenges”

-1

Anonymous #9 1w

No, it’s official colony law as of March 30th. November 10, 2025 was the first reading. Final version was approved last week on March 25 by parliamentary committee. It became law two days ago.

9

Anonymous #9 1w

zionists and Jews are not synonymous and it’s antisemitic to think so.

30

Anonymous #9 1w

As a Jew, please go tf away. You sound dumb af with that garbage

35

Anonymous #3 1w

I sound dumb because I don’t think it’s alright to repeat slurs coined by the KKK? I hope that’s an April fools day joke

-5

Anonymous #9 1w

While most Jews are not Zionists the word Zio is literally meant to describe all Jews.

-6

Anonymous #9 1w

You sound dumb because you continue to conflate all Jews with racist hate groups. zionists do not represent Jews, they represent a hateful, colonial ideology and that’s all.

14

Anonymous #1 1w

Sure. But the word “Zio” as opposed to Zionist is how David duke refers to all Jews. If you want to die on the hill of repeating slurs the KKK made up by all means keep going

-7

Anonymous #9 1w

It would have been and is used independently of those sick fucks, too. Not my fault they’re buddy-buddy with each other and similar, hateful rhetoric and actions. They do not represent Jews, quit fucking conflating them.

7

Anonymous #9 1w

I’m so sick of you racist fucks and your antisemitic tirades, especially when you cheer for a genocidal law. You need *serious* mental help.

14

Anonymous #8 1w

How is this incorrect?

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Brother most those zionists there are from Europe. The Palestinians are the ones that are even from there

1

Anonymous #7 1w

Bull shit. Yall have been saying Hamas this Hamas that for fucking decades and have provided no proof. Zionists broadcast their crimes on the internet and yall still wanna pretend they’re not Nazis. It’s so pathetic

1

Anonymous #9 1w

AI slip getting shit wrong again

0

Anonymous #7 1w

How are genocide justifiers like yourself able to just believe any anecdote you hear from isreali news.

8

Anonymous #9 1w

It’s literally not

4

Anonymous #4 1w

i've already provided evidence to my claim. the onus is now on you to provide counter evidence to the claim the only courts that will apply the *mandated death penalty* are military courts in the west bank that try palestinians. this aspect of the law literally *does not* apply to israelis. the mandatory death penalty *exclusively* applies to palestinians, which is unique to israel

1

Anonymous #4 1w

you would have to prove that the law applies to israeli citizens, or find another nation that is occupying another nation where they exclusively dish out mandatory death penalties for people of that regional ethnic background

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Your goal post shifting is disgusting. The issue isn't simply leniency. The issue is that this leniency means one ethnic group gets definitely hanged and the other gets a chance to live. This is unique to israel and unless you can find a state occupying another state and applying death penalties exclusively to the ethnic groups of that occupied state you can be quiet

1

Anonymous #3 1w

You do know Hamas also proudly broadcasts their crimes on the internet? If you are anti Israel but support Hamas you do not actually care about human rights

0

Anonymous #9 1w

I proudly support any resistance to horrifying colonial settlerism. If the settlers don’t want atrocious things done to them, they shouldn’t try colonizing a region violently. Simple as that. Do you hold the USA founders to the same standards? Because they did far worse things than Hamas

1

Anonymous #3 1w

Yea I’m actually consistent about condemning violence against civilians so of course I do

1

Anonymous #3 1w

Hamas are an Islamist organization that also murders any opposition that arises from their own people. In addition to slaughtering random people at a music festival and burning children alive. If you proudly support that have at it

1

Anonymous #9 1w

The “burning children alive “ this has been debunked so many times it’s so tiring to hear people still making this argument Stop listening to anecdotes, Isreal has killed 73x the number of civilians Hamas has in the last 2 years. There is no justifying their actions, even if you believe all of the other propaganda surrounding Hamas

5

Anonymous #10 1w

No. The 40 beheaded babies was. There were children burned alive. In fact their main tactic was to light people’s houses on fire

0

Anonymous #9 1w

OMFG I CANT BELIEVE YOU STILL BELIEVE THAT LIE😂😂😂😂 That is so pitiful that you STILL believe the 40 baby garbage that zionists ALREADY ADMITTED was a lie😂😂😂😂

0

Anonymous #9 1w

It’s so sad that y’all still latch on to the Oct 7th false flag as your best argument when zionists have been committing terrorist attacks to destabilize the region since the late 1800s. Pitiful genocide apologists

0

Anonymous #3 1w

Jesus I said the 40 beheaded babies was a lie. Can you calm down and actually read what I said? People were 100% burned alive in their homes though. Including children

1

Anonymous #9 1w

https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/07/17/october-7-crimes-against-humanity-war-crimes-hamas-led-groups feel free to read through this human rights watch report for reference

1

Anonymous #9 6d

Per the Times of Israel: “Short for Zionist, the word “Zio” has been deliberately twisted into a slur—used to demean, dehumanize, and delegitimize Jews who believe in the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in our ancestral homeland.” So no, Zio does not mean all Jewish people.

5