
Good lord this comment section is full of boot lickers. So sorry OP, your post is scarily relevant and accurate. If anyone disagrees with the statement in the image they simply are too biased or lazy to research the ideas at hand. Look up why big professors of fascism in our country moved countries following the last election for a start.
Antifa isn’t even prevalent anymore, trumps anti antifa thing is propaganda to make people like you think Antifa is a dangerous widespread organization so that you get triggered when you see anti fascist posts like this and keep kissing his feet and worshiping your fascist dictator
We are, in every way, exactly where nazi Germany was the year after electing hitler. free speech isn’t gone, but people who resist the trump administration are being punished and tracked, the military is being deployed to areas with a large population that voted against trump and companies are buying favor with the government by pledging their allegiance to this specific administration
There are signs of fascism, but that alone doesn’t not mean we are like Germany under hitler. Our military is not politicized, we still have multiple partys(the Democratic Party being as big as the Republican Party), our courts still operate independently, and the press is free(even tho its bought by both sides). It’s if any of these change that we need to worry.
What I mean when I saw our armed forces are not politicized is that they are loyal to the constitution and rule of the law, not to any one leader or party. Nazi germanys forces swore an oath to HITLER not the German state. Our soldiers do not take sides in politics or enforce trumps will, for example election decides presidents not force
Historically they called themselves “the allies”. But if a genuine threat of fascism emerged they would come up with something. Once again, names are buckets you can put anything into. You know organizations by their actions, not their names. A great example is calling yourself anti fascist and actually just going around beating up your political opponents regardless of their beliefs.
No, it’s not illegal. But assaulting people on the street for disagreeing with you is. “ANTIFA” is an ideology of violence against political opponents and thus I find it reprehensible, rest assured I would offer the same condemnation for equivalent behavior from any ideology. The fact that the ideology of ANTIFA is explicitly communist is not of concern to that.
How is it an ideology of violence? Because some bad actors take advantage of protests to break shit? “Antifa” is not an ideology, it’s literally just a saying and vague stance against facism. The republicans just want to label anyone using the phrase “antifa” as a terrorist so that they can extend that label to anyone against authoritarianism
Communism isn’t inherently violent yet requires the seizing of the means of production from those who would not give it up willingly, thus requiring the use of force aka violence. The same is true for Antifa. Fascism isn’t something that can be opposed by peaceful unintrusive demonstrations. It is something fought in the street, not at the ballot box.
Things that are unprecedented in the administration: sending other states national guards to cities when the governors and mayors don’t want them there Hiring cabinet members solely based on loyalty and firing anyone who goes against you Using airport tvs to play political messages to spread lies about a government shutdown
Our “checks and balances” don’t work with an administration that will lie about anything and everything with no accountability. Trump has pushed out illegal executive orders faster than courts can block them. Congress republicans are keeping the house shut down to stop the release of the Epstein files. And their is not a single way the American people can make them accountable for this until next years election cycle
And you’re right, I am saying communism is inherently evil. I say that because of two factors. first, it’s completely incorrect in its basic conceptions of human nature and economics. Secondly, it’s intrinsically forceful and violent. The combination of those factors are what makes it evil. It’s not evil to be wrong, it’s not evil to use force. It is evil to use force to attempt to enforce an incorrect position.
You’re confusing a consensual communist state with ones like Russia under stalin. It is not “against nature” to say that all people can provide for each other and have ownership of their own labor. Studies have shown that people, time and time again, will still work when they have no pressure to simply for the satisfaction of contributing to society. You can argue all you want about how communism can’t be integrated into modern American, which I think is true, but to say that communism relies on
You are talking about the implementation of communism immediately onto a capitalist society, which, of course, cannot be done in one lifetime. Again, I’m not saying that we should try to implement it here, but to say that it “requires violence” is completely wrong. The only reason it would be a violent revolution like Marx suggests is if the rich and powerful refused to give up their excess of wealth, which they obviously would
I’m not confusing the two. I simply believe that “consensual communism” on the scale of a “state” is demonstrably impossible. It’s a false ideology, and Marx recognized that which is why he advocated a “transition period” characterized by “dictatorship of the proletariat” and “revolutionary terror”. Both of those concepts being intrinsically violent and explicitly murderous.
You’re right, it’s only violent if people don’t go along, But the same is true of almost every ideology. Fascism is also only violent if people fight back. But that’s not a valid argument that these ideas are non violent because they contradict human nature, thus intrinsically people will ALWAYS fight back.
“Fascism is an unsustainable way to run a country.” Yes… and so is communism. Almost every one of the reasons that makes fascism unworkable also makes communism unworkable. And both require state violence against the so called “regressive” forces that oppose them (mostly people who just don’t agree with the batshit ideology they are both peddling.)
Sexist or sex addiction is running rampant in our country. It has destroyed the spirit and soul and minds of many and women alike. God can help people to find freedom from that bondage and to restore sex as God intended it to be in their lives. As far as racism goes, there’s no place for it. We are all God’s creation, and we are all to be treated the same and to be respected. Anyone who hates or considers another race or culture to be less than them or of the lowest of any human that I know.
It’s a bit of a strange stance to tell someone to “read a book” in an attempt to prove that communism is not violent. Perhaps I should start with gulag archipelago, or maybe one day in the life of Ivan desnisovitch. What about the history of the cultural revolution, or bloodlands? You know what, I’ll just reread Marx himself…. Funny, all of those books say communism is violent, very violent actually. Perhaps you should suggest a book that offers a different narrative.
I think that statement “fascism is only violent when people fight back” is incorrect as well. Any regime is going to use violence, not only as a means of quelling dissent, but to get rid of those they perceive as posing a threat (ex. Falun Gong in China). Also did the possibility cross your mind that the people you’re calling no lifers might be the same as you, like to argue and have too much time on their hands?
I guess my point is that facism, by definition, requires violence. If everyone woke up tomorrow and agreed to live in a communist society, everything would be fine. Is that realistic? No. But facism operates by oppressing groups of people to exploit them, there’s literally no other way for it to function. Also I’m more talking abt the people coming in here just to upvote/downvote, I appreciate people actually trying to add to the discussion
Fascism is an authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology that emphasizes the nation or race above the individual. It is characterized by a dictatorial leader, a centralized government, and the forcible suppression of opposition. So are you and other people in this discussion implying that Trump and the Republicans are facist?
You have told me to “read a book” multiple times, yet you clearly don’t understand much about fascism. “If everyone woke up tomorrow and agreed to be a communist everything would be fine.” A. that’s not true, communism is impossible on economic and philosophical grounds, not just social ones. B. If everyone did the same with fascism everything would also be “fine.” (ignoring the same economic laws which would lead to the ultimate destruction of an ideal fascist state)
The trap you’re falling into is evaluating Fascism in practice against communism in theory. You need to evaluate them against each other on equal terms. Either murderous totalitarian police state vs murderous totalitarian police state or physically impossible dream vs physically impossible dream. You can’t evaluate a theoretical dream against a practical nightmare.