Why? Because she was a woman? It seems as though dividing the world makes you emotional. I recognize her as the founder of the idea of universities but I don’t attribute it to her being a woman. That demeans her work to just be because of her gender. No, she accomplished what she did because she set her mind to it and ended up making the world a better place in the process.
I think it makes total sense to be proud of and inspired by women in education, especially considering the literal millennia of subjugation and oppression of women. In certain time periods and places, no amount of “setting your mind to it” would be enough if you’re being held back by institutions and society. And its not like its in the distant past, as a random example women couldn’t even get a business loan by themselves in the US until 1988