In some aspects definitely. The fact they can’t stop during an active show is definitely a factor but they are limited in the audience only seeing one perspective of the whole show. While film actors usually can be shown in multiple perspectives and angle
4
Anonymous6d
Because all theatre actors could do film but not all flim actors can do theatre.
1
Anonymous6d
Eh, theyre different mediums with different styles of acting. Subtlety in motion is not as much a thing in theater compared to film cuz when you’re sitting 100+ feet away from the stage you can’t see very much so the motions and medium as a whole is more exaggerated and grand.
1
Anonymous#16d
Yeah, but that really doesn’t come down to the actor’s talent/abilities. That’s more about production value. So my statement still stands.
-1
Anonymous#16d
That’s like if I were to say, “Mexican is the most delicious food,” and you responded with, “but waiters can be rude, so no.”
0
AnonymousOP6d
Fair, depends on how you look at it
1
Anonymous#26d
I feel like ether could do both ngl. They both have different qualities with them
1
Anonymous#16d
I mean most actors could do theatre but definitely not all. It’s a completely different ballgame for the actors that have no experience in it. And obviously they’d pick it up more easily than your average person but it wouldn’t be an immediate skill