Why? I haven’t been defending him, but didn’t he get convicted? Am I missing something? Not of “minor” charges either. What I read is he faces up to 20 years. He may not get em, but that part’s not the jury’s call. If he got convicted of some things but not others, that doesn’t automatically mean the jury’s ignoring evidence. It’s possible to be guilty of specific things and not others. Like how he didn’t kill Lee Oswald
And complaining about the jury… just doesn’t make a ton of sense. In most jurisdictions, the prosecution has the same opportunity to strike jurors as the defense. They even get the same number of peremptory strikes so you know the prosecution was striking men left right & center. Or do we have some reason to think it wasn’t the case in this one?
I didn’t follow this case bc I knew he was going to get away with more than he should bc celebs don’t have to follow the same rules we do 😒But what I did hear was that this particular case with these charges was weak and they expected him to skirt some of them. However there are so many other victims that are pressing charges and their cases are stronger so he will be back in court and likely will not beat those.
He’s still facing significant jail time for the charges he was convicted of. The only charge that the jury hung on was the racketeering charge but to be honest I think the Jurors are way more able to make that decision than the people of yikyak. The jury sat through the whole trial.
Uh. The fact they actually accepted the fact they were proven wrong, went ahead and DID MORE RESEARCH, and came back to the conversation is crazy. That’s character growth right there. They did more than a lot of people do. I don’t agree with the hate being thrown around but doing more research is worth applauding.
There’s aspects of truth to this, no doubt. But as a woman, I can tell you we don’t think all women are saints. We rip each other apart for literal fun. But we also know that we’re our only real protection sometimes. We pack together and put our trust in another woman who says something happened because there’s nobody to defend us but ourselves. It’s absolutely disgusting that there are women out there who would use that to rip into innocent men and ruin lives, undoubtedly.
But we also know that we can’t throw away claims because more often than not, they’ve got some serious truth to them, and if it happened to us (and it sadly happens to a lot of us) then we’d want that support too. We also gotta normalize supporting men in this situations too. Men can be raped, and men can be sexually assaulted. Doesn’t make them “less manly” or cowards, so anyone who says that needs to get a reality check cause that ain’t right. These are people we’re talking about.
I think you are only looking at the surface of things. I believe women are naturally vindictive, as I've witnessed even the nicest of girls tell lies when upset. Now, how does this come into play? When a situation arises and you have women banding together and admonishing someone who is still being tried, don't you think that takes away from the process of trial? Furthermore, if you destroy an innocent man's reputation and image, do you feel remorse afterward? Knowing you had a part to play?
I know them well, I studied them under a trial attorney and former judge. You don’t get to ‘look for’ favorable jurors; you have to avoid that bc if you find one, the other side strikes them. You have to look for your unfavorables and hope the other side misses more. But anyway my point is, both sides had a lawyer and the prosecutor was doing the same thing. That’s why the jury comp doesn’t generally suggest unfairness; that’s what voir dire is for
And I hope your line of work doesn’t require literacy. I just acknowledged how it works, and it CAN cause a bias (though, again, you can’t pick jurors and can only remove them; that’s 100% true even if you don’t like it). My point, as per my last message, is that both sides playing by the same rules (as they normally do in voir dire, unlike other portions of the process) doesn’t automatically disadvantage either or make a bias in one direction more likely than the other
all the evidence against him tho ??? just because a famous n wealthy man is found “not guilty” key words “by his peers”!!! BY HIS PEERS doesn’t make it the truth and ur just trying to get under peoples skin clearly lmao so idk why i even gave u the attention. racist because a black man did illegal things and i don’t like that he got off with it ?? and ur assuming im white cs i don’t agree with u or that mans actions??? enough heard from u lol ur a nuisance to society
literally!! video evidence of him throwing her on the ground and kicking her while he’s in nothing but a towel. so i don’t know how anyone could sit here n call him “innocent” or a “king”. a man who puts his hands on women while she lays there defenseless is far from a king … like imagine that was ur mother or ur sister etc would he still be a king??
i’m quite literally a criminal justice major 🤣 n like i’ve said before, and i’ll say it for a last time since obviously u only care to listen to what’s coming out of UR mouth. idc what he was or wasn’t on trial for i honestly have not been keeping up with it much all im saying is calling him “innocent” or “free him” is insane when by that video alone he is far from innocent. he is a woman abuser. and probably would’ve killed that woman if he had the chance.
You got it, hes a woman abuser. The video clearly shows that. You won, Cant argue with that. That being said DV is a thing in many toxic relationships and it happens on both sides. Idk what him and cassie be on, none of us were there. Cassie was with him for close to 15 years, she would have married him if he asked ateotd. But yea charge him with that somewhat minor DV charge but the traffickin and grape stuff was complete bs and you know it.
Oh yea i remember that shit… thats part of the reason why he won his case. That type of storytelling is considered sensationalism or just being vindictive. Every dude that ever had an ex or ex sex partner, that ex alot of the times will go around saying your dick little, even tho u were pounding her thru the mattress for years. I dont care to know specifics about his member but i doubt its a tootsie roll, dude had like 10 kids and was fucking shorty from city girls and all types of hoes.
Thats the problem. They are accusing him. Anybody can accuse anyone. I can accuse you of much worse things. The only thing that can prove it is by being innocent in trial, which has happened. Imagine being accused of something, verdict being not guilty, but still being accused. Point being, being accused doesnt mean its true
Cool, have at it… say whatever you want about the guy, like you said its yik yak. Except that the original post was a bunch of people being devastated and confused at how its possible for diddy to be found not guilty. So some of us that are rational, and have followed the evidence, and not just going off of memes, have given their opinions on how this SPECIFIC trial was week
Im seriously wondering this about you, Why does it matter so much to you that a bunch of rich prostitutes and gold diggers (saying it as a matter of fact not an insult) were deemed terrible and unreliable witnesses with ulterior motives(based on their own texts and interactions with diddy) Cassie has probably hustled 100 million out of diddy in the past 15 years. She doesnt know you exist, If you were on fire, she would walk past you and wouldn’t piss on you.
It wasnt obvious…. Matter of fact when you chill off the baby oil brain rot memes and internet chatter, you’ll see that the case was weak and the witnesses were terrible/unreliable. Also before u mention it, The hotel video was not admissible in court and he wasnt on trial for that, since it was past the statute of limitations.
No i dont… and theres zero evidence of it. Also if we’re just chatting about it and guessing, my feeling is it wouldnt make sense. The celebrity/entertainment world is very cutthroat and someone is always trying to get clout and or take you down when youre a billionaire. If there was any evidence or a phone that sneaked even 10 seconds of footage, it would come out. A secret like that involves all those celebrities and their staff. A secret that more than 2 people know, never stays that way
Who cassie? Evidence over feelings… the text messages from cassie read in court proved otherwise. Why are u mad that 12 members of the jury found her to be a terrible witness with possible ulterior motives. Cassie has hustled close to a 100 million from diddy in their almost 15 year relationship. Yall pick the weirdest people to feel sorry for
Yall gotta get off these tik tok conspiracy heads FYPs. Is this really the goofy shit that sounds smart to brain deads? A raid that had photos of celebrities? This is what they do at all white parties they take pictures with all the people/celebrities there, especially the hosts. Micheal rubins white party in the hamptons, everybody takes pictures, its not a blackmail attempt. Yall dont go to parties or anywhere and it shows. Touch grass
5 icloud accounts is alot? I have 2 and im a nobody. Also what is it that you think that proves, even if there really ate 5 accounts. 40 devices? Again these people live differently. Diddy has like 10 kids and household staff, 40 devices isnt alot. Theres probably 10 or so devices at my house, older phones i never got rid of, tablets, etc. 10 devices and im a regular nobody. Again i dont think you even know what youre implying by the mentioning of 40 devices.
That being said both sides have to agree on the jury picks. So the victim’s attorneys agreed that those who served on the jury were fit and impartial. They also have to come to a unanimous decision on EACH count. So rather than demonizing men maybe consider the fact that the women on the jury agreed with the verdict too. And if you’re unhappy with that verdict blame the attorneys and look forward to the stronger cases that are sure to follow.