Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
i’m looking into the clancy case for the first time. i have just graduated with my degree in crime scene investigation; specializing in forensic death investigations. one thing all my professors made very clear was that babies are EASY to kill.
upvote 17 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

i’m not saying she’s innocent i’m not saying she’s guilty, but i am simply saying that these news outlets are completely over exaggerating what it takes to kill a child

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

i say this because listening to these reports on it say she had to have strangled them with the band and known what she was doing and it’s a hard and rigorous process etc… like suid and sids exist BECAUSE babies are so easily killed

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

Right, but two of them were not infants

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 6w

it is undeniably easy to kill a 5 year old, 3 year old, and an 8 month old. it would take little effort for any of them

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6w

Right, but not accidentally kill all 3. I guess I’m not sure what you’re trying to refute exactly. Can you give an example of what you’re disagreeing with?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 6w

right no i don’t think it’s an accident but just a handful of the news outlets that i personally have looked into (which isn’t a lot i will truthfully admit) have been like ms. clancy had vigorously strangled the kids took effort drained her etc when in reality it’s just kinda a simple done deal, it’s a kid not an adult yk?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6w

Yeah, that’s fair. Strangling a child doesn’t take much strength I suppose.

upvote 2 downvote