Anonymous #2 1w

even though he literally didn't and they're just peddling that lie as an excuse to hate a man who was killed by a racist cop even more

47

Anonymous #5 1w

Send the part of the autopsy that says his cause of death was an overdose

24

Anonymous #5 1w

Even if he did, how is it funny?

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Look it up!

-3

Anonymous #6 1w

I don’t know how fucked up you are, but I never said it was funny. Just telling you straight out facts!

-2

Anonymous #5 1w

Why is the idea that he died of an overdose something OP should have looked up before posting this? Is it because that would make the conservatives’ shirts funny and ok to wear?

1

Anonymous #5 1w

I know what the autopsy says. You clearly do not

13

Anonymous #4 6d

No, just used his influence to promote the idea that children should be forced to watch people get executed. Charlie Kirk was not a virtuous man. He was a piece of shit. It’s just that his negative influence as a public figure is not really comparable to the negative influence of some hoodlum from Minneapolis, but it was probably even worse.

21

He got this amount of hate while he was alive, too. It just wasn’t as concentrated. There’s no use venerating him simply because he happened to get killed. He did not die for any noble cause.

13

As for some of his points warranting discussion, I don’t know what those would be. He spewed some empowering and more broadly applicable rhetoric at the beginning of his career because he needed to start from a more acceptable place to fulfill his goal of shifting the Overton window and priming America for the impending fascist takeover. But as for his general points, he promoted a variety of scientific and political misinformation, encouraged distrust of formal education to serve a clear

5

Anonymous #8 6d

political agenda, and insulted any demographic that wasn’t a white Christian nationalist.

5

Anonymous #3 6d

Finding any excuse for people tom. “No one deserves to die” yet they are killing immigrants in their process to remove them. They had a family too. Where’s the humanity?!? Just can’t be one of their own then it’s a problem

2

Anonymous OP 6d

It’s the fact he died at the hands of the people whose literal job it is to keep people safe. Died at the hands of people who are payed by OUR tax dollars

9

Anonymous #5 6d

Even if he had drugs in his system we both know that wasn’t actually his cause of death and u are ignorant to think otherwise. That isn’t opinion, that’s truth. Quit justifying what happened

2

Anonymous #8 6d

No he didn’t.

-2

Anonymous #10 6d

He didn’t what?

1

Anonymous #8 6d

Charlie Kirk did not insult any demographic that wasn’t white Christian nationalist. You are thinking of Nick Fuentes who hated Charlie to the core.

-1

Anonymous #10 6d

I was talking about how he used DEI policies as an excuse to assume the incompetency of black pilots; implied that women should primarily only attend college for an MRS degree; invoked 9/11 as an excuse to oppose the election of Zohran Mamdani; repeated the claim that Haitians were eating cats and dogs;

5

Anonymous #10 6d

advocated for shooting and whipping Mexican immigrants at the southern border; promoted antisemitic conspiracy theories that Jews control colleges, nonprofits, movies, and Hollywood; and opposed the immigration of Indians on the basis that they weren’t Christian enough. Nick Fuentes is just more explicit about it.

4

Anonymous #8 6d

He did not do any of that. Lie all you like, I hope one day you’ll grow above this. God bless.

0

Anonymous #10 6d

Do you want sources, or would you prefer to remain in ignorance? Some of these instances are quite commonly cited, especially at this point in history. They are on his Wikipedia page.

1