It’s important for fiction to portray reality accurately even if it's unpleasant
9
🫕
Anonymous9w
mfs voting shouldn’t be used really gotta learn the difference between depiction and endorsement
8
Anonymous9w
I mean it’s alr depending on what it is. If it’s just the n word or some shit no 💀. If it’s like Clankers like in Star Wars then that’s fine imo
5
Anonymous9w
idk. is it worse to be exposed to a character’s unfiltered bigotry, or to sanitize and whitewash them?
I think if the slur use is *gratuitous*, then the problem is pretty clearly the author being bigoted and not a character saying a slur
3
Anonymous9w
I mean I guess it depends on context???
Like are we talking about uncle toms cabin where it was anti slavery. Or just being racist? Or what
0
Anonymous9w
One of my favorite bits in my book is the main character’s name being similar to another language’s equivalent of the f slur. Why would I get rid of that?
0
Anonymous#39w
Yes unfortunately the idea of an “uncle Tom” may have overshadowed the anti slavery parts of it.
But at the time it was actually a good Anti slavery book
1
Anonymous#39w
Historical fiction I feel like kinda has to use it to stay accurate, honestly what I was thinking of when I wrote this was that one South Park episode
1
🫕
Anonymouscheese_of_the_world_unite9w
if I’m writing a villain who’s a bigot, his ass is saying slurs, not because I like writing them or I agree with them, but because that demonstrates how bad they are
6
AnonymousOP9w
Right, but there were also pro slavery historical fiction that were specifically meant to legitimize Uncle Tom and legitimize slavery good or whatever
Are slurs bad then? I mean yeah