i can actually hear the excuses now: “that was 20 years ago” “well that girl wad old enough to know x y z” “we have to separate the person from the presidency”

13

I think they want proof first. There’s stuff he suggests he did in the files, but nothing substantive. He hasn’t been charged, and in civics we learned in the US you are presumed innocent until proven guilty. If there’s such substantial proof in the files, someone should sue him and take him to court and use it as evidence. The fact that no one has suggests what’s in the files in the current form is not enough to indict him. There’s other files that would have to be released first.

1