
He could be, yes. He could be gay, a terrorist himself, or a follower of the great spaghetti monster. He could be a martian, a moon person, or even a single-celled organism. He COULD be anything. But none of those assumptions are REASONABLE, because there is no EVIDENCE. So I ask again - what EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE to support the idea I should take your “could be” even REMOTELY seriously?