
Unironically, crazy as this sounds, hold up a stopwatch as you’re talking so the camera can see it. Preferably not your phone (so you can look stuff up) He makes himself look smart by clipping stuff out of context, so having something keeping time out in the open means the footage will be useless to his organization
I’m thinking something along the lines of: “In October 2023 you were under the impression that Israel let October 7th happen. There’s videos of you saying that. Then, in November 2023, Netanyahu denied a “hostages for ceasefire” agreement. Seeing as that they let their citizens die on that day, and refused to stop fighting in order to save their civilians, how can you genuinely say that their mission is Gaza is for their people’s safety, and not to conduct a cleansing?”
british political talking points are similar enough that he thought he could do the same thing and realized even conservative brit’s are left of american democrats on most things. he was trained on how to deal with 98% of all american political discourse. tbh your best bet would be to go centrists or independent viewpoints but they can’t be morally based.
lol but people have done that and it just gets buried. like you might get 10 seconds of reddit clout but is that worth it? i’d avoid those people at all costs. he came to my campus and i just stayed home while people tried to petition my school to not let him be here then tried to do what you’re trying to do. all anyone remembers is the people he clowned on
Ooo I like this “Charlie I wanted to bring up South Park, now you yourself did a good job of taking that in stride and I wanted to make sure I complemented you on that. However… the White House absolutely lost it over a few little jokes. Like these dastardly snowflakes can’t even take a joke from an irrelevant 20 minute cartoon. I took you as a man of strength and integrity. How can you still support the current White House based on their reaction to such a trivial matter?”
Charlie Kirk isn’t a good debater. He just parrots talking points and logical fallacies, knowing that his base will eat it up like chickens eating cat shit as it falls from the cat’s ass. His power doesn’t come from winning, it comes from feeding his audience’s bias. Logic, reason, and good debating will not prevent him from meeting this goal. Win or lose, it will only give him power. You want to beat him? Ignore him. He’s an ignoramus not worth your big brain study time. Don’t legitimize him.
Remember: he and his organization have to pay travel costs to get to all these colleges, on top of camera operators and editors as well as Kirk himself. The worst possible outcome for them is to loose money. If they go to a campus and get no usable footage because someone held up a stopwatch, then that’s a financial loss for them. They paid all that money just to end up with nothing to show for it