also lets not forget he was for some reason trying to spin it as though people could be victims of bestiality, saying it couldve been involuntary.
like im sorry?
17
Anonymous1d
If only there was an article attached to this headline…
-1
👺
Anonymous22h
It was for people who were sex trafficked and forced to do things with animals btw
-3
Anonymous1d
Meanwhile the other side has literal furries lmao
-12
Anonymous#21d
Thanks for extending a job opportunity to them I guess idk
30
AnonymousOP1d
Holy projection lol
-8
Anonymous#21d
What?😭
19
Anonymous#21d
What about them lmao
10
Anonymous#21d
You realize that to protect from what you’re implying furries do, bestiality still needs to be a disqualifying factor? What the fuck was the point of your comment?
19
🏴☠️
Anonymous#21d
Oh y’all have NOTHING, huh?
10
Anonymoustroybolton1222h
You’re telling me they got rid of the entire crime of bestiality as a disqualification to be a FED, for like the 2 people in existence who was forced into bestiality and also somehow was arrested for it, and also wants to be a fed.
6
AnonymousOP22h
Do you seriously think that’s what happened? I was joking in my comment but you seriously didn’t read the article wow
2
👺
AnonymousOP22h
Yo it's legit in the first paragraph of the article lmfao
3
Anonymoustroybolton1222h
Please we all know this is an appeal to the shitkicker demographic to be a fed lol
1
👺
AnonymousOP22h
I mean the article you linked doesn't agree with you
1
Anonymous#321h
Actually yeah I think this is exactly what happened.
1
Anonymous#1021h
That would make sense for someone who didn’t read the article
1
Anonymous#321h
They’re not distinguishing between people who who were coerced or did it on purpose. Let’s be real no one buys this shit
0
Anonymous#120h
You conservatives are CONSTANTLY trying to draw arbitrary lines around sexuality. You cant help what youre attracted too, interspecies sex is entirely natural. Bigot
-1
Anonymous#1120h
I’m not buying it, only a handful of white women are THAT woke