Anonymous #2 9w

so it was never about protecting against tyranny, you realize we are the weakest alone. only as strong as our most vulnerable link.

3

Anonymous OP 9w

I'd stand with you to protect against tyranny if I knew you would do the same but I'm willing to bet you wouldn't.

0

Anonymous #2 9w

u just said u won’t because youre too busy protecting yourself… and yes i do already do that its called protesting

3

Anonymous OP 9w

Yeah, that's the point. If I have people who I trust and can depend on then I would stand alongside them against tyranny. If I have to look out for myself, that's my first priority. Sorry, but no matter how many "protests" you go to, I don't trust you or think I can depend on you.

0

Anonymous #2 9w

ok, i really dont care what ur opinion is. all you care about is ur own safety and not to “protect againdt tyranny” like you claim, which ironically makes you an easy target for oppression, you are the last to resist.

1

Anonymous OP 9w

Tyranny is literally the oppression of individual rights. You can only collectively rise against that tyranny if you agree on the rights being oppressed, something we clearly wouldn't agree on. I have no problem with deporting illegal immigrants, and if I had to guess you would have no issue with red flag laws and assault weapons bans. That's why I don't trust yoy

0

Anonymous #2 9w

u assume too much. ur problem is that now with how theyre deporting undocumented ppl, they have stripped away due process for not only them but any1 the state calls an “illegal immigrant” . that means u too. if other ppl no have rights, u no have rights too, maybe i state and i call u other people

3

Anonymous OP 9w

That isn't an immigration issue, that's an issue with federal LEO having too much power (something I have been spouting for years)

0

Anonymous OP 9w

Kinda like how until 2022 all federal LEO had the complete ability to rewrite laws without congressional oversight. Now the ATF continues to do it despite SCOTUS ruling against them, and nobody says anything.

0

Anonymous #2 9w

These organizations shouldn't even BE ABLE to subvert due process, the fact that they were able to switch to openly doing so in a matter of days is telling to the fact that they were doing so in secret for a long time prior.

0

Anonymous #2 9w

dude its literally immigration. ur making stuff up at this point. DEPORTING IMIGRANTS without DUE PROCESS and then calling any1 u want to oppress/deprt/put in a death camp or concentration camp an IMIGRANT to do it is an IMMIGRATION issue

1

Anonymous OP 9w

I didn't make any of that up, maybe speculated somewhat in that last comment though

0

Anonymous OP 9w

so the “IMMIGRATION POWERS” FOR DEPORTING ANYONE THE STATE CALLS AN IMMIGRANT IS AN IMMIGRATION DUE PROCESS ISSUE

1

Anonymous OP 9w

I mean sure treat the symptom not the cause if that's what you're trying to do

0

Anonymous #2 9w

dude, the problem is a conservative/protofacist president and SCOTUS and congress , which movement has been brought about through decades of neoliberalism/capatalist deterioration

1

Anonymous OP 9w

the problem isnt one hyper specific court case, its literally just capatalists bleeding people of their ability to live then propping up a fascist movement when the people are desperate enough for one

3

Anonymous OP 9w

Yeah there's no problem with the fact that an entire law enforcement organization was just completely okay with circumventing the rules of law

1

Anonymous #2 9w

"No corruption to be seen there please only look at the president"

0

Anonymous #2 9w

the law enforcement afency works solely at the behest of capital and is quite literally under the command of the executive branch

4

Anonymous OP 9w

Lol the classic "we were just following orders"

2