Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
No one who’s looked into it ever says this
anyone who says they believe it was an inside is either room-temp IQ or rage baiting
upvote 4 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

what makes you genuinely believe it was an inside job?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

There’s 0 reason to believe it’s not lmao

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

Other than, like, everything

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

there is no strong evidence to support the claim that it was done by the US but alright

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

Look at how other planes that hit tall buildings deal damage. It doesn’t line up with the total collapse of the building the whole thing wouldn’t go down like that

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

Anybody who has studied structural engineering knows that it is exactly what would happen.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

Well I haven’t! Could you explain? I can only draw from comparisons

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

so what do you think caused the collapse of not the fucking commercial airplanes that hit them🤦🏼‍♂️

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

*if

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

An in-depth explanation would take a lot of diagrams and stuff, but here’s a simpler explanation: the building is built to what’s called a certain factor of safety. That’s how many times stronger something is than its expected load. Usually that’s going to be 3 or 4. This is for the loads acting on the structure as a whole. The impact had two effects: it destroyed much of the structure in the immediate site, and it weakened the rest. (1/4)

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

This means that the same load from the floors above is spread out across fewer supports, and they’re each weaker. The formula for factor of safety is FS=(strength)/(expected load). In this case, the strength is now lower, and the expected load per beam is higher. Basic math shows us that this makes the factor of safety much lower. As soon as it crosses below 1, we have reached our failure state. (2/4)

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

After a while of higher load in on each beam, leading to elastic deformation, and higher temperatures the whole time, that state was reached. As soon as you have the weight of ~20 stories of skyscraper falling on the structure below, the impact becomes much greater, as Force=mass*acceleration. Mass stays the same obviously, and acceleration goes from 0 in the static state to 9.81 m/s^2 of gravity. (3/4)

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

This WELL exceeds the failure state for the floors below, and with each floor that joins the collapsing mass, the domino effect continues and increases all the way to the ground. (4/4)

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

Actually, I should issue a correction. The force from gravity IS 9.81 m/s^2 in the static state, that’s just weight. The increased impact from falling is momentum, P=mass*velocity. Velocity is what increases. It’s the difference between a brick sitting on you, and falling on you. Velocity increases at a rate of 9.81 m/s^2 from rest, beginning at the moment of failure. As each story joins the collapse, mass increases, and so does velocity due to gravity.

upvote 6 downvote