
The simple fact is that the Founding Fathers were already the colonial elite before the Revolution. Their goal was NOT to fundamentally change the way society worked in the colonies, but to have the capacity to govern for themselves. They were businessmen, ranking military officers, lawyers, etc. James Madison talked about protecting the “opulent minority” from the masses. It was a bourgeois revolution from the start.
Thomas Paine was the GOAT, any shit I talk about the Founding Fathers simply does not apply to him. His swag was so different, his smoke was so tough, that when he died nobody showed up to his funeral. Because after the Revolution, he spent his days pissing off the very same elite he supported in throwing off British occupation. Paine was FAR ahead of his time, and definitely the best of them.
The French Revolution was also a bourgeois revolution though. In the 1700s, that was still a huge step forward. Both the American and French Revolutions were moments of historic progress, of bourgeois liberalism overthrowing monarchic feudalism. That’s an important step, but bourgeois liberalism still has its inherent flaws and is not the final step to full-on mass liberation.
The word “Bourgeoisie” comes from the French Revolution. It refers to the low-born, but high-achieving class of people that led the French Revolution. People like Robespierre, who was a member of the 3rd Estate, no doubt, but the upper-crust of that estate. The lawyers, the doctors, the printing press owners, etc. the people who were not born into noble houses, but had achieved a class status that could almost rival the nobility. The bourgeoisie threw off the nobility, a bourgeois revolution.