Anonymous #1 12w

Please… elaborate

-1

Anonymous OP 12w

you’re gonna deny it and cry like a piss baby anyway

3

Anonymous OP 12w

like genuinely, if you seriously weren’t aware of this there’s no shot anything we say is gonna change your mind

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

Deny what?? Youre a moron bud 💀

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

AWARE OF WHAT THERES BEEN NO WAR, NO RECESSION, NO ABORTION BAN, NO ALLIANCE WITH RUSSIA YOU’RE WRONGGG

1

Anonymous OP 12w

IF THERE WASNT A WAR WHY THE FUCK DID WE BOMB IRAN

1

Anonymous OP 12w

IF THERE WASNT A WAR WHY THE FUCK DID IRAN TRY TO BOMB US??

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

We struck Iran to destroy their nuclear facilities then we fucking let you idiot

-1

Anonymous OP 12w

right and so suddenly bombing another country isn’t an act of war 😭

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

Fucking idiot

1

Anonymous OP 12w

does this change literally anything about the fact it was war. do you just consider bombing countries’ nuclear sites to be peaceful?? are you braindead??

1

Anonymous OP 12w

Women are dying nationwide due to abortion bans and you have the audacity to say there’s no ban??? The actual fuck is wrong with you

4

Anonymous #1 12w

ong, a braindead woman in georgia used as a literal human incubator because of these bullshit abortion laws

3

Anonymous #1 12w

No the fuck they aren’t bud be so for real, and again has Trump signed a national abortion ban or are states dictating their own laws??

-1

Anonymous #1 12w

abortion bans that were facilitated by Trump’s SCOTUS picks overturning RvW Luckily there won’t be a federal abortion ban anytime soon

2

Anonymous OP 12w

they are and you saying they aren’t doesn’t mean they aren’t. there are plenty of sources that prove this to be true.

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

Doubt she was as brain dead as you are bud

-1

Anonymous OP 12w

now that’s just mean

1

Anonymous OP 12w

oh boohoo you gonna make another joke at a braindead woman’s expense to try and hurt my feelings or what?

1

Anonymous #3 12w

Returning power to the states isn’t remotely the same as a national (federal) abortion ban

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

Making a joke at your expense

1

Anonymous OP 12w

nah i brought up a woman who was braindead and forced to carry the baby to term (which was later cut out of her because her body literally could not birth the child) while you’re sitting here saying the abortion laws haven’t changed anything and poke fun at the fact that she was braindead to get an easy insult in. i have thick skin, idc, its just weird as fuck

1

Anonymous OP 12w

Who the fuck appointed the judges who overturned roe v wade?? Oh yeah it was trump

2

Anonymous #3 12w

Ah yes state abortion bans are much much better!

3

Anonymous #1 12w

Yeah and the supreme court overrules itself a lot. Again, thats still not a NATIONAL abortion ban

0

Anonymous #1 12w

Yes state abortion bans means that theres other states that allow for abortion???

0

Anonymous OP 12w

I explicitly said there won’t be a federal abortion ban And returning power to states facilitated state bans

3

Anonymous OP 12w

So you’d be outraged if there was a federal abortion ban instead?

3

Anonymous OP 12w

Oh yeah because the women in states that ban abortion can easily get to states that allow abortion. Do you not realize how stupid you are

3

Anonymous #1 12w

I said he didn’t sign one even though Harris had said she would, and he hasn’t and has time and time again said he wouldn’t

-1

Anonymous #3 12w

Ok so? That doesn’t mean women aren’t being denied life saving abortion services

3

Anonymous OP 12w

BUT HE APPOINTED THE JUDGES WHO OVERTURNED ROE V WADE AND RETURNED IT TO THE STATES! What the fuck isn’t registering in your brain?

3

Anonymous OP 12w

And i mean there was no reason to think he wouldn’t, and we all know trump’s word isn’t that trustworthy

2

Anonymous OP 12w

Harris never said she’d sign a federal abortion ban be so fr.

3

Anonymous #1 12w

Holy fuck you really are stupid. HARRIS SAID THAT TRUMP WOULD SIGN A NATIONAL ABORTION BAN AND HE HASN’T

0

Anonymous OP 12w

No he just returned it to the states and women are dying in the states with an abortion ban. The fuck is your problem

2

Anonymous OP 12w

You’re completely fine with women dying in the states with a ban. Seek professional help

2

Anonymous #1 12w

Women don’t die from not getting abortions, and miscarriages are separate things you dullard, there is not a bit of legal language that prevents doctors from giving care to women experiencing miscarriages. Only idiot doctors that thinks so and don’t provide care. Women die from sepsis from trying to get abortions (which is a common problem because they are dangerous)

2

Anonymous #1 12w

Oh shut up.

-1

Anonymous #1 12w

You’re completely fine with 60 million children having been killed since Roe V. Wade was passed.

-1

Anonymous OP 12w

lol so you’ve been pro-life the entire time 😂 why didn’t you say so?

1

Anonymous OP 12w

Oh shut up. I’m not fine with children being killed. But most abortions are performed when it’s just cells so it doesn’t have a heartbeat and can’t feel anything. That’s not killing children. And if you’re so pro-life, how many children have you adopted? Have you donated money for the starving children in Gaza or other places? Do you support free lunches for children in schools?

4

Anonymous OP 12w

They literally are…. you’re too stupid and ignorant to not understand

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Sit down.

0

Anonymous OP 12w

I think you misread #4, Trump was the one who said that Harris would have us in war

1

Anonymous OP 12w

That’s not what I said. Lick my sweaty nuts.

1

Anonymous OP 12w

You’ve been wrong about everything. Maybe you should sit down and shut up

2

Anonymous #3 12w

Yeah, my bad. Either way a lot of people (and what this post is about) are saying that Kamala said we’d have war within six months

0

Anonymous #4 12w

they ain’t gotta lick anything 😭😭 we don’t know where you’ve been

1

Anonymous #3 12w

It’s a heat wave boo and the sweat on my nuts isn’t gonna lick itself off

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Yeah I said my bad bruh

1

Anonymous OP 12w

Aight I’ll use a wet wipe

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Use a dude wipe, have some dignity

1

Anonymous OP 12w

All I have is Lysol

1

Anonymous OP 12w

Yeouch my neeners

1

Anonymous OP 12w

this shit did NOT age well LMFAOOOO

1

Anonymous OP 12w

she almost died and then she was so quick to double back on that abortion ban and blame the left for legislation she literally voted to put in place 💀

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

Oh did Trump sign that Florida bill as national law, or are you purposefully trying to change what I said. You’re a drone

0

Anonymous OP 12w

are you too dense to understand how stacking a supreme court so that they overrule RvW literally changes national law? abortion was federally legal until HE changed it indirectly by PURPOSEFULLY stacking the court for that decision. meaning, he IS responsible for the change in both national and state law as he was that catalyst for it and the reason that it was no longer federally protected in the first place. but sure, play the semantics game

1

Anonymous OP 12w

also you realize this was clarified AFTER what happened with Kat Cammack right… like the law itself was left so vague and it’s so difficult to legislate that there was confusion in getting her emergency care which could have literally delayed her care too long and she would have died :/

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

He didn’t stack the supreme court you fucking moron, people died and he replaced them. That’s not stacking the court like Biden had wanted to do (which is adding MORE NEW members to the current bench, so you can have them vote in your favor) that’s filling vacancies, which is a part of the presidents job. You’d be begging the supreme court to overrule the decision if there were a federal ban on abortion, so why are you crying the opposite happened when they overrule on federal abortion mandate.

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

The supreme court gave the power back to the states to decide within there own state, that’s not a ban on abortion everywhere you dullard

0

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

And again the law is not ambiguous, ectopic pregnancies are not illegal. And that just reinforces what I said that doctors are afraid to do their job because they’ve been victims of fear mongering making them worry about things that aren’t illegal.

1

Anonymous OP 12w

i’m not begging the supreme court to do jack shit, they should’ve never overturned the decision in the first place. it was entirely unnecessary. if they didn’t want to ban abortions, why the fuck would they overturn a ruling that made them legal at the federal level that stood for 60 years?? also, why does the state get to decide if a woman’s reason for her termination of her pregnancy is “valid” enough? it’s not anyone’s call other than the woman’s, not on a federal or state level.

1

Anonymous OP 12w

yeah because everyone knows that it’s just so easy to drive across state lines to get access to medical care instead of just leaving it legal on a federal level LMAO

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

Shouldn’t have overturned it, but you’re glad they ruled that way in the first place “i don’t want them to do jack shit” it is rarely the federal governments job to dictate laws of state government. Thats why they overturned it. They decide wether it’s valid because A CHILD DIES IN THE PROCESS YOU FUCKING MORON. They overturned it because states have the right to vote on their own laws.

0

Anonymous OP 12w

doctors are afraid because right wing politicians are legislating abortion bans that literally do not line up with scientific consensus. it isn’t about “fear mongering” holy shit. at 6 weeks, a lot of pregnancies literally go unnoticed. they don’t show up on ultrasounds, sometimes you’ll even get a false negative pregnancy test. but somehow, abortion is banned at this point. the fetus doesn’t develop sentience, pain receptor, until about 20 weeks, which was the normal cut off for abortions.

1

Anonymous OP 12w

a fetus and a child are not the same thing. a non sentient clump of cells without pain receptors that has no awareness is not the same as a living breathing baby with sentience, pain receptors, first hand experiences, emotions, etc.

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

What scientific consensus are you talking about? The one that states life begins at conception? And yes it is fear mongering because doctors are afraid to do their jobs not because of clear bans on abortion, but because they’ve been told if a woman need any type of medical care related to pregnancy than she can’t be treated

1

Anonymous OP 12w

it got overturned because people think they should get to have a say in what women do with their own bodies under the guise of “protecting kids!!” it’s a violation of bodily autonomy. it puts restrictions on personal emergency healthcare. it doesn’t lower the rate of abortions, it lowers the rate of safe abortions. women will still abort if they cannot take care of the baby even in states with bans. it’s just super unsafe.

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

And I hope you know “fetuses” (which literally means offspring, same as child or baby) form pain receptors 7 weeks in.

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

You fucking idiot. There is NO RESTRICTION ON EMERGENCY HEALTH CARE, ECTOPIC PREGNANCIES ARE NOT ILLEGAL MISCARRIAGES ARE NOT ILLEGAL WHY ARE YOU NOT GETTING THIS THROUGH YOUR THICK FUCKING SKULL

0

Anonymous OP 12w

i never argued life didn’t begin at conception lol. it literally does. but the development of necessary biological mechanisms takes up to 20 weeks before pain receptors, response to stimuli, sentience/awareness, etc occur. that’s the consensus i’m talking about. no one is saying it’s not a human life. it’s just not a person yet because it has no pain receptors, no sentience, to response to outside stimuli, cannot live on its own, does not have first person subjective experience, etc.

1

Anonymous OP 12w

hey so ectopic pregnancies aren’t the only instances where someone might need an emergency abortion!! hope this helps!

1

Anonymous OP 12w

they BEGIN to develop at 7 weeks, they ARENT developed until 14-15 weeks. like you understand these things don’t just pop up? they develop? and that takes time?

1

Anonymous OP 12w

like abortions past 20 weeks should be restricted since at that point it’s so developed that it would be morally wrong to terminate a sentient human being. but here’s the thing, LATE TERM ABORTIONS WERE ALREADY ILLEGAL TO BEGIN WITH.

1

Anonymous OP 12w

we can restrict abortion at 20 weeks that’s fine, but restricting it before it even shows up on a pregnancy test or ultrasound is crazy???

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

You’re brain dead… please. Enlighten me on when an abortion is an emergency. Even though .9% of abortions are to do with the mother’s physical health. And guess what if you agree that life begins at conception then that means YOU KILL THE PERSON THT WAS CONCEIVED

1

Anonymous OP 12w

right because it’s better to raise a child in poverty or an abusive situation, or to just dump them in foster care or the adoption system. BIRTH CONTROL FAILS. PEOPLE CAN DO EVERYTHING RIGHT AND STILL END UP PREGNANT. If a woman cannot afford to take care of her child, to clothe the child, to feed the child, to get the child adequate medical care, you think she should still be forced to give birth and bring a child into an unstable situation that could literally lead to that child’s death??

1

Anonymous OP 12w

personally, id rather get an abortion than bring a child into a situation where i know i cannot afford to take care of them or where they would be in danger of starving, not receiving adequate medical care, or even being abused by an unstable figure. it isn’t my job to police people’s reasons for doing this, but they should at least have the PERSONAL choice of what to do and shouldn’t be forced into having a child they can’t afford to take care of.

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

YES????? ITS BETTER TO BE POOR THAN FUCKING DEAD???

0

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

If you’re so poor and destitute maybe DONT HAVE SEX. If i can’t afford a child im not going to do the one thing that leads to having a child

0

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

You’re evil. You’d rather a child be dead than poor.

0

Anonymous OP 12w

truly spoken like someone who didn’t grow up in poverty, i grew up most of my formative years with major food insecurity due to my parents’ own financial instability. if i knew that the child i had was going to be born into a similar situation, i would also abort BEFORE 20 weeks, and wait until i’m FINANCIALLY STABLE ENOUGH TO CARE FOR A CHILD.

1

Anonymous OP 12w

i already explained the difference between a clump of cells and a living breathing person. so i’m not responding to this again. i think you’re evil because you would rather a child grow up (as in YEARS) starving, abused, with terrible quality of life and major instability rather than terminating the pregnancy when the fetus hasn’t even developed sentience yet. it cannot tell the difference. that is the scientific consensus.

1

Anonymous OP 12w

You do have a point re: don’t have sex if you can’t raise the child, except it’s not that simple. Sometimes accidents happen, sometimes circumstances change (speaking as a 23 yo virgin lol)

3

Anonymous #3 12w

And regardless, it just isn’t any of our business. I don’t like abortion, but what another woman does with this isn’t my (a man’s) business

3

Anonymous OP 12w

like you realize childhood poverty and homelessness are one of the HARDEST things a child can experience right?? the mental, emotional, and physical toll is immense. and you want to put a living breathing PERSON through that for YEARS, rather than terminating an unfeeling, unthinking, clump of cells BEFORE 20 WEEKS OF GESTATION. you could save so much suffering, but for some reason you think terminating some cells is the same thing as actually killing a living breathing person??

1

Anonymous #3 12w

this tbh, like if you’re personally pro life that’s totally valid and acceptable. i just don’t think any of us should get to make decisions in people’s personal lives like this, every single person should at least have the CHOICE of what THEY want to do.

1

Anonymous #3 12w

also id say, consent to sex is just consent to sex. you’re consenting to having sex not to having a baby unless that is directly discussed. the same way it’s considered rape if the guy takes off the condom without telling the woman. also yes, because no birth control is 100% effective. people can do EVERYTHING right, i dont think they should be “punished” or blamed for something entirely out of their control.

1

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 12w

yes exactly, which is why i said accidents happen

2

Anonymous OP 12w

yeah i’m sure you and every other person who doesn’t feel like having a baby at this time just ENTIRELY ABSTAIN FROM SEX realistically, and historically, abstinence has never worked. people shouldn’t be blamed for wanting to have sex, we’re human it’s pretty common for us to have sex for pleasure and not specifically for fornication. that’s why abortions and emergency contraceptives exist, so if birth control fails they aren’t punished and forced into being parents at an unstable time.

1

Anonymous OP 12w

like bro if you don’t wanna have sex don’t have sex. that doesn’t mean the rest of us shouldn’t get to have sex unless we specifically want to have kids?? if abstaining works for you great, but just because you don’t personally think people need this emergency resource doesn’t mean it isn’t needed by people who ARENT YOU.

1