Anonymous #1 6d

“ Here’s what Epstein had to say” “Oh yeah well so what if he didn’t actually say that uhhh ermm its the same”

1

Anonymous OP 6d

Yeah I don’t really care which pedophile said it, point absolutely remains the same. Also ridiculous to be slandering a countries former leader with cia bullshit while this is the only thing about him in the files and it’s negative.

1

Anonymous #1 6d

Are you saying he should get a pass just because he’s mentioned once (not true)?

1

Anonymous #2 6d

No, if you have actual evidence drop it, go right ahead

1

Anonymous #2 6d

Huh no reply, interesting

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

So if that’s not what you’re saying, what are you saying?

1

Anonymous #1 6d

Someone’s impatient

1

Anonymous #2 6d

Yeah I am if you are gonna drop fedposts and not back up your shit. I’m saying Jeffery’s pedophile circle clearly celebrated the man’s death, and the the original posts claim is simply false.

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

What do you think about the pictures of Jeffrey Epstein and Fidel Castro together?

4

Anonymous #1 6d

I asked you to clarify what you meant. The pictures of them together are easily googleable, but here you go

0

Anonymous OP 6d

You mean the one prior to his conviction for sex crimes in 2008, found next to photos with other famous people like the Pope? Yeah I think that’s a stretch if you are implying anything lmao

0

Anonymous #2 6d

Yup I’m aware of it lmao, look my comment even predicted you’d post the pope one! Very funny you replied this at the same time OP brought this up….

0

Anonymous #1 6d

You said it didn’t happen. You were incorrect, either because of arrogance or because you were trying to cover it up

3

Anonymous #2 6d

I never said there no photos of the men together, just that they weren’t involved in the crimes. Not once did I make any claim that this photo didn’t happen lmao

0

Anonymous #1 6d

Jeffrey Epstein, the same man who was investigated in 2005? With the prosecutors saying the abuse started as early as 2002? And flew to Cuba in 2003 at Castro‘s request?

1

Anonymous OP 6d

*As alleged by former Colombian President lmao. The photo simply shows the two together, nothing more. And ahh gee I guess we should have expected the Cuban president to have remote access into the FBI’s records to have known what he was up to lol

0

Anonymous #1 6d

“Hes just a lil innocent guy how could he have known :/ he was just inviting some random guy”

1

Anonymous OP 6d

He didn’t invite him actually, it’s alleged by a Columbia politician. And besides inviting a wealthy investor is smart move, dosent prove any wrongdoing. You have a pedophile president in office, deal with him before throwing accusations against the nation YOUR pedophile president is busy strangling

1

Anonymous #1 6d

Im not a trump guy no need to pivot to that, nice try though

2

Anonymous #1 6d

So first it was slander by the CIA, now it’s a smart move?

1

Anonymous OP 6d

Then quit doing Trumps work for him, undermining Cuban leadership while Trump seeks to overthrow and gut their country. Deal with your fucking guy, he’s your president whether you voted for him or not.

-1

Anonymous #2 6d

It is slander, I said implying he did without proof is slander yes. AND IF it was a real invitation there’s no proof it wasn’t innocent in nature.

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

He’s your president too? What do you mean

1

Anonymous OP 6d

The difference is I’m not being an imperialist running dog

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

Do you scrutinize the legitimacy of every other name on that list? Or every other one of his acquaintances

3

Anonymous #1 6d

Slander is saying he did it and knowing that it’s not true. Speculation is saying he did it without proof. I did neither.

0

Anonymous OP 6d

The ones that showed repeated close contacts and repeated direct correspondence yes, none of those are present with the former Pope or Castro, to say they are is slander.

1

Anonymous #1 6d

And I don’t like the pope, it would be convenient propaganda if there was that connection, but there isn’t.

1

Anonymous #1 6d

The catholic church has been riddled with abuse of alter boys, repeatedly for decades. It is not a far jump at all

1

Anonymous OP 6d

Correct, I agree the Catholic Church is despicable, but the evidence is lacking on the pope trust me I’d pounce on it if I thought there was more than reasonable suspicion

1

Anonymous #1 6d

Other high up Catholic officials very likely are involved but their names are certainly being withheld

1