Anonymous #1 11w

You “left the left” Where did you go afterwards?

10

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

Not to the make America great again crowd, there are several parties you realize, correct? Liberal isn’t the same as a leftist just like a conservative isn’t the same as a republican. Same goes for moderates, independents, and centrists. I’d consider myself right of center, more of a moderate but still right leaning

-1

Anonymous #1 11w

Being a moderate in this current climate still benefits the Republican Party more than the democrat party.

5

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

And the Republican Party gets people attracted towards it due to it being the more tolerant party as of now

-1

Anonymous #1 11w

Care to provide an example?

4

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

Everyone in particular has harped on me this past twenty minutes for some reason. Idk why what I said was so damn controversial, but somehow I get called several names including Handmaid from this posting whereas I for example haven’t called y’all a single name. I’ve just called it as I see it

-1

Anonymous #1 11w

Not to interject but it could be ur views on abortion💀 yk…considering it’s a controversial subject in general no matter the stance

6

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

And brainwashed. And I was quoted TWICE whereas anyone can post a “fuck trump” post and no one will bat an eye. It’ll get tons of upvotes

-2

Anonymous #1 11w

Well, being anti-abortion is pretty intolerant of you.

5

Anonymous #1 11w

I mean yea…fuck Trump💀 he just signed a bill that’ll possibly add 4 trillion dollars to the national debt and gave tax cuts to ppl who don’t need tax cuts. Oh but he took taxes away from tips…

6

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

I wasn’t even the one who brought it up. And being anti-life is pretty intolerant of you

-2

Anonymous #1 11w

Because Trump is an asshole? I fail to see your point.

5

Anonymous #1 11w

Lmfao you think being pro-choice is being “anti-life”, what does that even mean?

7

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

You’d rather kill a baby in development than provide them with other options of survival like any other humans with human rights. The baby that is killed never gets to choose, and if they did chances are they’d rather have a shot at life than not. The mothers shouldn’t be the one to say whether or not they can survive when they’re already a new being as soon as a new code of DNA is constructed during contraception

-2

Anonymous #1 11w

i genuinely need you to provide evidence that republicans are remotely tolerant

8

Anonymous #1 11w

News flash: Adult women, who’ve lived and would’ve continued to do so, die more often in states where abortion is illegal. Not very pro-life of you.

7

Anonymous #1 11w

The “baby in development” wouldn’t have chosen because they literally don’t have a brain before 33 weeks.

6

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

News flash: women who are said to be at risk for dying at childbirth are most often able to get different procedures, such as a C-section to save the life of both. There are even other surgeries for if the baby develops outside of the womb. And in most cases when mothers are extremely at risk, the baby has already passed and I genuinely can’t think of an instance where the mother has to kill the baby to save her life. It’s really typically C-sections and not that complex or drastic

-2

Anonymous #1 11w

“The baby has already passed” It’s still considered a type of abortion even in that scenario. Which holds under an abortion ban. This has literally led to preventable deaths for women. Please do some research on the subject.

4

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

I’m not an absolutist so of course I think any logical medical professional would allow for exceptions if it was truly necessary. Even Trump knows that which is why he didn’t do a complete ban. But I also think we all know most abortions don’t happen out of it being completely and utterly necessary. We should protect the people who do need it, but the ones who don’t truly need it are ruining it for everyone because it’s a completely unnecessary loss of a human life in the majority of instances

-1

Anonymous #1 11w

You also still haven’t provided an example of the Republican Party being the more tolerant of the main two yet.

1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

That’s a miscarriage

0

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

This was the “brainwashed handmaid” comment, whereas like I said I’ve been nothing but cordial and just sharing my opinions. Maybe a little spicy here and there but nothing like name calling. That’s not very tolerant of the left I fear

0

Anonymous #1 11w

You’ve only been trying to disavow the left so far. I’m asking you: Please provide an example of the Republican Party being MORE tolerant than the Democratic Party.

3

Anonymous #1 11w

First page of google btw, lmk if you see the problem with your “any logical medical professional would allow for exceptions if it was truly necessary” logic.

1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

I literally provided you with a real life example of a yikyak conversation from today

-1

Anonymous #1 11w

1. That’s anecdotal 2. I’m talking about parties, not individuals

2

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

Oh wait I actually know you. I’m only choosing to disengage because it’s late and you run in circles with people on here forever because you desperately want to be correct in everything you say. I’m tiredddd of conversing with you so I’m not going to get caught up in a game of “provide an example” of something pretty much immeasurable on an accurate and mass scale. I was responding to the intolerance I was seeing within the conversation so I don’t mean to be anecdotal, I’ve just been calling

-1

Anonymous #1 11w

Things how I see it. I don’t know how to direct you back to the original conversation and the other people who’ve subsequently quoted and dmed me so I just am gonna go to bed now

1

Anonymous #1 11w

Goodnight, I hope I at least got you thinking about stuff. It’s about all I can hope for on here. Bye!

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

Aw now I feel bad I genuinely thought you just try to bait people into long back and forths on here to debate semantics and stupid shit, I could also be getting names confused because only like a few people really use their users and they tend to be big personalities who like to get a rise out of others. I hope the same for you about this, goodnight💤

-3

Anonymous #1 11w

I mean, I do admittedly get into back and forths with people here sometimes. And I can be a bit of an asshole at times. But overall my goal here is to get people thinking. Goodnight.

3

Anonymous #1 11w

it’s not medical professionals who make those exceptions… and republican bans regularly lack them. people have died, a lot of them because of these bans.

3