Anonymous #1 3w

This is a 2011 email ?? Released by congress by his estate on a court order too. It’s perfectly admissible evidence.

1

Anonymous #1 3w

If we get emails implicating him then ofc I’ll change my mind.

1

Anonymous #1 3w

Lmao no fucking shot your defense now is “well we can’t trust Epstein!!!” Brother who the fuck would be a more direct source than the fucking person himself????

1

Anonymous OP 3w

I wouldn’t accept a known sex offenders email as hard evidence that his close friend wasn’t also a sex offender when there’s evidence to the contrary. clearly he was responding to someone asking about it and all he had in response was “deny deny deny”

1

Anonymous #1 3w

Brother this is literally evidence that there was a connection between a sex offender and a potential other How is there evidence someone isn’t a sex offender? Like do you have evidence of their entire life? Are you certain they have zero secrets? And now you’re disregarding actual evidence because you’ve convinced yourself that the other party has to be innocent. That’s not how logic, reason, law, science, or the world works. That’s called *delusion* 💅

1

Anonymous #2 3w

he hadn’t even been arrested yet like lolol why would he incriminate himself or anyone associated with him? Do u think he was above lying

1

Anonymous #2 3w

the evidence btw: “none of this is true 😌”

1