Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
This is such obviously intentionally skewed data it’s actually hilarious how much I see this posted as if it’s an own
6 upvotes, 8 comments. Yik Yak image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "This is such obviously intentionally skewed data it’s actually hilarious how much I see this posted as if it’s an own"
upvote 6 downvote

🦐
Anonymous 1w

Anyway here’s a chart that doesn’t divide cis people into a million micro categories

post
upvote 10 downvote
🦐
Anonymous 1w

The “per capita” bros are REALLY stretching it w this one help

upvote 5 downvote
🍑
Anonymous 1w

Also can’t help but notice how trans people are just two groups, but for cis people we suddenly have to start dividing everyone by race just to obfuscate how many shooters are cis men

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Like why do we start going by race out of nowhere???

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Also to any stem major we should be able to realize it’s fake. You don’t put multiple groups on one graph. It’s either race, or gender. You can do sub categories of “black man” and “asian woman” but it would also need to be “trans black man” “trans Asian woman” “nonbinary white person”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> just_peachy_ 1w

It only includes like 3 races and amongst those races there’s more shootings than either group of trans people. Makes me wonder how gargantuan the total number must have been for them to have to try so hard to make it unclear.

upvote 8 downvote
🍑
Anonymous replying to -> shrimp_fried_rice 1w

Trans people are estimated to be roughly 1% of the population, or 0.01 Divide 4 by 2830 and you get 0.001, or .1%. Trans people are actually underrepresented in mass shooters by a factor of ten And this is being generous, because the graph is from 2023 and I’ve added to the trans population but not the cis population

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> shrimp_fried_rice 1w

Did you read ops post or did you just look at the picture? They’re saying the graph is clearly wrong and you’re arguing against them. YOU’RE ON THE SAME SIDE

upvote -1 downvote