Anonymous #2 14w

Literally

9

Anonymous #2 14w

That doesn’t make any sense, would there be a time requirement? Nobody has committed a crime until they do

-10

Anonymous #5 14w

Illegal/undocumented immigrants are less than half as likely to commit a crime than native-born Americans. That’s why. Deporting people who haven’t done anything is even more absurd.

11

Probably a lot simpler then paying a bunch of goons to go round people up 😒🤨 they literally tried to set up an app for “self deportations”

3

Waiting period for what?

1

Anonymous #6 14w

You can argue that’s because of the threat of deportation or a million other factors. Technically all of them have committed a crime if they are undocumented, no matter how benign. And I’m not arguing against immigration in any sense, I’m just saying that fast tracking doesn’t make any sense - if a person crosses the border and doesn’t commit a crime for 1 day should they be fast tracked or should there be other requirements?

1

Anonymous #8 14w

That’s the point of the states man, for smaller groups of people to govern themselves.

5

Anonymous #5 14w

We love your strawmanning. Shows where your stance is very clearly. By us saying fast-track we are definitely advocating for first-day citizenship. You hit the nail on the head!

1

Anonymous #6 14w

I’m not strawmanning, if that’s what you’re advocating for, say that. I was pretty clearly just asking how it would work - but people like you love to make anyone who asks questions or points out flaws in a discussion an instant enemy. Also, pretty hard to strawman when the original comment is literally one scroll up.

1

Anonymous #5 14w

Definition: “A straw man fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction” Their argument: We should have expedited pathways for legal citizenship for illegal immigrants with no record Straw man: “So we should give anyone who comes over to the US and doesn’t commit a crime first day citizenship?!”

1

Anonymous #6 14w

Hi, what I actually did is called asking a question that directly addresses #2’s comment and asked for further clarification! 😁 Hope that helps!

1

Anonymous #5 14w

Hope it helps that everyone can see through your bullshit and is downvoting you 😁 Love people who try to claim they’re neutral “independents” and then use such blatantly right-wing rhetoric.

1

Anonymous #6 14w

Blatant right wing rhetoric is asking follow up questions? This country is doomed

1

Anonymous #5 14w

It’s pretty self explanatory how it would function, there is loads of media and propaganda behind deportations. If I was president I would first reform what is happening at the border and the citizenship process. Then there would be a self report phase where immigrants can bring family, or other witnesses (employers, neighbors) with them that can help develop a report and secure citizenship. Once their a citizen and a crime is reported it’s then an easier process of finding them, but this allows

1

Anonymous #2 14w

People who are here but are afraid of being deported a way of coming forward and continuing to work without the worry of being shipped away. It isn’t perfect, but it’s a hell of a lot better then what’s going on now

1