Oh see but if you’re going to use a specific index as a source, you have to use its language! Bc otherwise you kinda just sound like a dunce who doesn’t quite understand what the hell they’re talking about :( “check the hdi” ok buddy I did and it proves you’re wrong bc your argument wasn’t based off the hdi, but another mysterious index with other language
And that’s wrong, for a multitude of reasons. The hdi, the human development index, is an actual thing, you know. It’s regulated. It’s not just a phrase or any jumble of statistics based on development. And it places countries on a scale with 4 subcategories of development. Low development, medium development, high development, and very high development. China is ranked in the high development category. No first second third world, no developed vs developing. Do you know what it even is?