Anonymous #2 13w

cope harder

16

Anonymous #3 13w

I know, it’s hard for you to imagine a world where people can be in two places at once

-4

Anonymous #3 13w

If I’m wrong why don’t you explain instead of being such a baby?

-5

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

🪞

-4

Anonymous #2 13w

The photos speak for themselves lmao

14

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

How does this how the amount of people watching from home?

-7

Anonymous #2 13w

They predicted that millions would show up in person lol, and at the very best a few thousand did. The cringe optics don’t go away just because you wanna make a guess that people actually watched it on tv lol

13

Anonymous #2 13w

This is 1991 compared to 2025

11

Anonymous OP 13w

Not to mention if you actually watched the televised footage, it’s just sad lol. No one is standing and cheering, all just quietly sitting down, as the soldiers slowly stumble along because they clearly don’t want to be there lol. Even in the WH’s post about it they show nothing of the crowd or the parade itself, likely because they knew how shit it all looked lmao

1

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

You’re still not showing any numbers. Did 1991 have the streaming services that 2025 does?

-7

Anonymous #2 13w

Do YOU have numbers to prove people watched it lol. You’re the one saying it, burden of proof is on you big dog

7

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

I was saying that there could’ve been more people watching on tv. Keyword: could’ve. I made no assertion, and you fail to even address the notion

-7

Anonymous #2 13w

Nah nah nah lol, don’t divert, if you’re gonna make a claim let’s see you back it up, otherwise it’s all just speculation. If that’s the best you have, I will proceed with ignoring your coping ass and go back to laughing at the actual, real footage of this spectacle lmao

11

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

Not diverting. You clearly don’t understand that it’s not unreasonable to say that a parade in one fraction of the country isn’t going to physically garner as many people as online if in a society people would more likely watch from home. You seemed to contest the notion, but haven’t anything to show for a reason why. That’s on YOU.

-4

Anonymous #2 13w

It is not on me lmao, you don’t understand how the burden of proof works. If you’re speculating and have no proof to back it up, that is all just speculation. Aka, literally worthless. It’s clear you’re not gonna bother trying anyways lmao

3

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

You’re still not comprehending what I’m saying. I gave you speculation as to a reasonable cause for why not a lot of people showed up. You contested that that wasn’t the case. You made that assertion, you finish it. What is true about this situation that makes that speculation false?

-3

Anonymous #2 13w

Me patiently waiting for Trump defenders to actually back up their claims for one on this app:

1

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

I guess you’ve run out of things to say

-4

Anonymous #2 13w

You’re all bark and no bite

-4

Anonymous #2 13w

Lmao says the big bad speculator over here

5

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

Dang I’m sorry for being impartial. Not my fault you can’t back up your own claims.

-3

Anonymous #2 13w

Notice how there were protests all over the world for No More Kings which were wildly successful….. yet apparently no one could show up bc people watch TV instead for these things, according to your logic. This can only mean a few things, one which is pretty funny and accurate being people who are against trump are way more impassioned about their country than people who like trump.

5

Anonymous #5 13w

Bro you do you realize a protest is meant to be physical right? Nobody protests from home unless it’s an internet endeavor. This was a parade to celebrate the army, in the same sense one might watch the thanksgiving parade from home or if they are nearby travel to see it physically. You’re comparing things that are completely different in nature. Not to mention that the parade for the army was in DC only, not something happening at the same time across several states.

-2

Anonymous #2 13w

Still funny that visually more people showed up for the protests than the parade, stop coping and accept his parade failed

6

Anonymous #2 13w

Bro ive seen more people at the average macys parade than that military one

3

Anonymous #6 13w

You don’t have to like the parade to comprehend that not everyone is going to travel physically if they can watch from home. Why is this so hard to understand, I’m only pointing out that the physical attendance doesn’t account for everyone actively watching the parade.

-2

Anonymous #2 13w

Literally anyone can watch a parade on their tv lol, that’s barely support. They estimated around 200,000 would attend and roughly 10,000 did. At least Double that number showed up for No Kings protests in Houston and San Diego. It was a fucking flop plain and simple lmao

2

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

At least 200,000 I should say, apparently they were hoping for far more and got nowhere close lol

3

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

Yea anyone. Exactly, you can’t account for total viewership by physical attendance alone.

-1

Anonymous #2 13w

… so, can we say that 3 billion people world wide were watching the no more kings protests then?

3

Anonymous #2 13w

Physical and virtual attendance are tied in terms of public interest, if less people showed up physically then likely less people show up virtually. A large magnitude more of people attended the protests physically compared to the parade, so it’s reasonable to think that more people also watched virtually.

3

Anonymous #2 13w

You dont have to like the truth to comprehend it but just think for a minute and shit might make sense

3

Anonymous #2 13w

Are you denying that the parade was a flop? People didn’t come out and support it on a weekend lol, it was well over a 150,000 thousand less people than their lowest estimate. TV viewership doesn’t mean shit.

3

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

Doesn’t mean anything in the case of protest, but a national parade is measured both in physical attendance and televised viewership. Not my fault someone who’s 1000 miles away isn’t going to go to DC for a weekend for a parade that can be viewed live on television.

0

Anonymous #2 13w

Dude the people IN dc didnt want to show up

1

Anonymous #2 13w

For someone arguing their pussy off about televised viewership you still have no proof whatsoever that ratings were high across channels that covered it lol, I’m still waiting on that btw

1

Anonymous #2 13w

All you’ve done so far is play the halfway game of “okay I’m gonna make and defend this point but STILL just say it’s speculation so I can act like I don’t have to provide proof” and it’s really embarrassing lol

1

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

I’m saying it’s a possibility, dumbass. You keep asserting that it’s not the case, why haven’t I gotten anything from you?

-1

Anonymous #2 13w

Pull up these viewership numbers then, most televised news station showed both the parade and the protests. Unless 90% of conservatives were watching with a VPN and pirating the parade then even by your standards his parade fell short. the truth hurts sometimes

5

Anonymous #2 13w

When making a claim, the burden of proof is on you. We cant proof a negative

3

Anonymous #2 13w

Again, not how the burden of proof works my guy. Until you actually show that televised viewership was high and that people actually did pay attention to this in the moment, you have no leg to stand on lol. It’s mind blowing that they let people like you into higher education lmao

4

Anonymous #5 13w

I never made a claim. If he wants to say that it’s not the case, he has to provide proof that something that is true resulted in my speculation being false

-1

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

Exactly, dudes saying “just trust me people watched” when every bit of reality says otherwise. Mf is a slave to Fox News

4

Anonymous #2 13w

YOU CANT PROVE A NEGATIVE. Prove leprechauns dont exist. Give definitive proof.

3

Anonymous #2 13w

“Erm it’s just a possibility, it’s just speculation, just assumptions” is just a chickenshit way to dodge around not actually defending your point properly and do dodge having to admit defeat lol

3

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

Bros a little bitch fencesitter. Too scared to admit he likes trump cause of how unpopular trump is rn

3

Anonymous #5 13w

I love watching trumpers jump back and forth on their morals to try and justify why they support trump

4

Anonymous #6 13w

Why are you bringing in something that is irrelevant? Have you run out of argument?

-1

Anonymous #2 13w

“Have you run out of argument” brother you’ve been grasping at so many straws in this whole debate that you could build a whole ass scarecrow out of em at this point

1

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

I’m being precise. It was never an argument to begin with, but you decided to get yourself muddy and now you’re here avoiding your burdens and throwing your conclusions to justify being an asshole

0

Anonymous #2 13w

Im lookin through my comments to find the irrelevant bit, the one about y’all’s morals jumping requires the most thought so I’ll break it down for you. Republicans always stand on the ground of “fact over feelings” but in this sense yall are all willingly looking away and claiming what a success this parade was while every bit of reality and truth says otherwise

3

Anonymous #2 13w

“Avoiding my burdens” it never was mine to begin with lmao

1

Anonymous #6 13w

Yall? I’ve taken no stance whatsoever on my political positions in anything and you being your crap onto the table like it’s relevant. It’s completely reasonable to speculate that a parade that is both televised and physically active can get attendance through both mediums.

0

Anonymous #2 13w

Tell you what bud, I’ll make it real easy for you: you Venmo me for a coffee and I’ll take on your burden of proof for you! If I’m gonna take the time to look up data for your own point, I should at least be compensated for it.

1

Anonymous #2 13w

My dude dont be stupid. No ones falling for this BS, taking time out of your day to make up an explanation to why no one showed up to trumps b-day party is blatant support. The fact that you cant make a hardline stance doesnt make you a rationalist, it makes you an indecisive bitch

2

Anonymous #2 13w

And both mediums dont share variance with public attendance? Why would virtual attendance be significantly higher than physical for one event and not another? Think for a minute and get back to me

2

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

You don’t understand. I never said whether or not there was more or less in online attendance, just that to get the total requires factoring in both and not one over the other

-1

Anonymous #6 13w

Because television is more accessible than the physical location of the parade

-1

Anonymous #2 13w

Yes, but if people who live there didnt bother to show up, why would people who dont give a shit

2

Anonymous #2 13w

Factoring both into account, even estimating that virtual attendance was MUCH higher than physical for the parade, the protests still outweighed the parade. Take a good look at the real world and stop lying to yourself

3

Anonymous #2 13w

You don’t call saying this in your initial comment claiming there was more watching virtually?

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Again, unless everyone watched the parade through a VPN or pirated it through a secondary source, the parade still underperformed. Stop contorting yourself to suck Donald’s dick and just look

3

Anonymous #2 13w

Using logic, we can assume that there is a correlation between online viewership and public in person attendance. Its really that simple, yet youre REALLY pushing this idea that “well we dont KNOW how many people like trump”

4

Anonymous #5 13w

Because it’s the nation’s army, not DC’s army. One population not attending physically does not constitute that another population won’t

0

Anonymous #2 13w

This has got to be the most roundabout ordeal of chickenshittery I’ve seen in a while lol

1

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

You clearly didn’t read it completely. A claim is a definitive stance. I opened to the possibility of individuals streaming

0

Anonymous #2 13w

Still waiting on the viewership numbers

2

Anonymous #2 13w

And yet you’re defending it to no end lol, it’s a claim in every sense except your ability to call it such. Are all Trump meatriders this lukewarm on their stances and cowardly to make an actual point

1

Anonymous #2 13w

“Opened the possibility to a claim” how many hurdles you wanna jump over for that opinion?

3

Anonymous #6 13w

When did I say definitely “It’s because more people were streaming it than physically” ?

0

Anonymous #6 13w

“Opened the possibility to a claim” brother just say made a claim, you’re beating around the bush more than Trump does when he goes down on Melania

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Well whats your point then, you opened the possibility now take advantage of it baby

3

Anonymous #2 13w

Again, we can use basic logic here. DC, believe it or not, is part of the nation. And people in DC didnt bother to show up. So youre argument is that its possible that people are secretly happy about this parade everywhere BUT dc. Like, i can make insane claims that might be possible too, i believe its possible trump is secretly a doppleganger clone of literal hitler. And you couldnt prove me wrong, but its stupid to say, just like what youre saying

3

Anonymous #6 13w

It’s a reasonable speculation, if I had definitive numbers on online viewership I would pick a stance. Why would I be irresponsible enough to take a strong position of something if I don’t have the full picture?

0

Anonymous #2 13w

If you’re defending self-admitted uninformed speculation this fervently I would call that taking a stance lol

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Then why speculate at all. Literally youre going to”well anything is possible” that doesn’t add shit to the discourse

2

Anonymous #5 13w

If you want to say that you can but all you’ve done is speculate on what’s happening.

0

Anonymous #2 13w

Then why you commenting? I have a strong stance and evidence that online viewership and physical viewership shows the parade was abysmal compared to protests. Yet again i ask, whats your point in ‘opening the possibility’.

1

Anonymous #5 13w

Because people are taking a definitive stance on it without the full picture.

0

Anonymous #2 13w

If you’re gonna put up a mirror emoji to me saying your coping and act like you’re not with speculation, then act like a coward and refuse a stance, then you do not get to act like you’re the insightful one here lmao

1

Anonymous #6 13w

Ok show the numbers then for the online viewership

-1

Anonymous #2 13w

So that this can be closed

-1

Anonymous #2 13w

Bro youre the one making the claim that its possible

3

Anonymous #2 13w

Brother it’s on YOU to do that, you are the one who brought it up and “speculated” on it to begin with. If you’re at the point where you’re asking for others to do your own burden of proof work for you, you are taking a stance lol

1

Anonymous #5 13w

Saying something is possible is different from saying something is true

0

Anonymous big_al_the_riddler 13w

It’s not my burden of proof because I never made the statement whether something was equivocally true

0

Anonymous #2 13w

91k views

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Saying something is possible is trying to entertain it is possible. Usually youd have something to back that up, otherwise youre just wildly speculating as well

3

Anonymous #6 13w

630k views, even picked fox as its the most watched for republicans.

2

Anonymous #2 13w

First google search definitely isn’t the most accurate, but with a difference that big it may just be significant

1

Anonymous #6 13w

Seems like you’ve found one outlet that was streaming it. Hopefully there’s a count that will tell us the viewership from all of the outlets. I appreciate this though, regardless of Fox News being a bs news station like the rest this does yield some data

0

Anonymous #6 13w

The comment above this was before you made this comment so it’s a bit late. Thanks tho

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Honestly this might be the one thing we agree on, stats dont always equal reality. But i dont think you even need stats to look online and see the view differences

1

Anonymous #6 13w

All I can attest to is that people focus more on things they don’t like than things they do

1

Anonymous #2 13w

So you attest that more people watched and attended the protests than the parade?

1

Anonymous #6 13w

Stats aren’t replicas of reality, but they get close enough where there isn’t a significant difference

1

Anonymous #6 13w

I mean if you want to measure a protest by online attendance you can. In that case, it would be numbered by people watching it from headlines, watching from streams, etc.

1

Anonymous #2 13w

I ain’t gonna argue stats with you cause thats my major but i honestly do agree stats are NOT reality, especially surveys and political shit. They’re the most easily manipulated datapool. But the application to reality is what really matters, are the stats representative of the truth. And in this case you don’t even need to calculate significance causes the numbers show enough difference. No stats needed, just common sense

1

Anonymous #6 13w

I never wanted to make it out that there were more parade attendees than protestors

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Well then what’s your point about online viewership? Im gon keep asking cause you ‘opened the possibility’ either stand your ground or stfu

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Just that if we’re going to say the parade did terrible, to at least take into account the online numbers before making the assertion

1

Anonymous #2 13w

I am looking at the online numbers, we can make an assertion RIGHT NOW. What makes you think 2 million more people are gonna watch the parade online tomorrow instead of today? What’s going to change in the coming week?

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Of course I could’ve worded it better but my whole intention was to say to measure the other mediums before putting it down. Which is why I brought up accessibility, to at least give some merit as to why it’s worth looking into before taking a position

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Bro ur fucking lobotomized

1