
Bro collectivism calls for the ownership of private property by the group and distribution of goods according to need not profit. If I work hard and make more than everyone else my surplus is distributed to the people who didn’t put in the same level of work. It’s literally the core tenant of Marxist communism.
Yeah I love capitalism. I operated a business from my phone for about two years and had to stop recently. I was a sports bettor and paid for software to identify EV bets and arbitrage opportunities and other strategies as well. Ultimately I got limited from all books in my state for winning too much so time to find the next thing. Anyone can make money if you want it badly enough.
Because those issues aren’t what we’re trying to solve nor are they the root of the issues lol. Being opposed to “The most extreme of ideas” is because those ideas propose a new way of living? Like “extremism” isn’t a criticism lol. Also you’d have much more clarity on the goal of communists if you actually just read Marx.
Are you actually this dumb? Why would that be how we recognize contributions? Like that’s actually four year old who got his sand castle kicked mentality ?? There are contributions because of capitalism. But when wealth accumulates class struggle intensifies and the backbone of industry being the working class should be able to control the means that they labor and toil with and for.
Those are the problems the person listed you can say they aren’t your problems, and you make an entirely new arguement if you want. Yes that’s what extreme means that it’s different than the current norm. Yes it is, our current norm is relatively extremely successful so ofc going away from the norm has the chance of moving away from what works. Again then make a different argument when I’m talking to #2 I’m not addressing whatever is #1’s head.
And to do so you get rid of the structure capitalism built. Did the Visigoths ‘recognize the contributions’ of the Roman Empire when they sacked Rome? Of course not. They might use the burnt-out corpses of buildings as shelter but the act of burning them down in the first place is an expression of disrespect. The same applies here. Communism might use the structures capitalism built during the transition to its ideal classless worker society but the act of tearing it down is one of contempt.
Uh no didn’t want to bash your heads on how smart I was. I told you to read Marx, ur allergic to reading or something so just asked specifically what Marx talked about (you lack a general understanding of communism, so any explanation would be lost on you) and then I told you to read him to get your questions answered. You are a college student. You should not be this offended because someone told you to read.
Man I honestly don’t know how to get through to you. Put as simply as possible: giving someone a reading list during an argument isn’t a valid form of debate. If someone was asked to disprove a point in an actual debate and their response was “oh just read x” they’d be laughed off stage. It’s evasive and weak. You are being evasive
Because this isn’t a debate. You’re an idiot that doesn’t understand Marxism, i told you what to read in order to understand Marxism, you reply with “NOOO TELLING SOMEONE TO READ IS NOT A REBUTTAL!!” Well.. yeah..? It’s not supposed to be one. It’s me telling you to actually familiarize yourself with the discussion topic at hand before attempting to debate it LOL
Imagine how I feel trying to talk to you. You’re so blinded by hate all you can do is spew insults and worship Marx without any critical thinking on why his ideology has never worked, produced a successful nation, or reached its end goal 😔. On the other hand, capitalism dominates the globe and is responsible for all of the luxuries we enjoy today.