Anonymous #7 10w

None of your business

26

Anonymous #7 10w

You should also give, idk crazy idea….but like idk maybe the fucking mothers who DONT WANT TO BE A FUCKING MOTHER?!!?

16

Anonymous #9 10w

Then don’t have sex. That’s a sure way to not be a mother

-8

Anonymous #9 10w

Then they’ll say “you should’ve kept your legs closed if you didn’t want to be a mother” 🙄

11

Anonymous #7 10w

Consent to sex isn’t consent to pregnancy.

18

Anonymous #8 10w

And that’s a great suggestion. If you have consensual sex you take on the responsibility of possibly becoming a father/mother

-9

Anonymous #8 10w

“I did the thing that makes pregnancy happen but I’m not consenting to pregnancy” what a stupid fucking statement

-9

Anonymous #7 10w

Nope. Just because someone wants to have sex, doesn’t mean they want to he a mother/father.

11

Anonymous #7 10w

Yeah because the sole purpose of sex is pregnancy right. What a stupid fucking take

13

Anonymous #7 10w

Dude the whole point of America is not dictating other people any true patriot should recognize that

13

Anonymous #11 10w

You’re schizophrenic please take your meds I’m concerned

14

Anonymous #4 10w

You can't fight the data.

-9

Anonymous #7 10w

Sex is nice. I’ll have it if I want to. I ain’t keeping no fucking baby tho.

5

Anonymous #11 10w

You genuinely need to be institutionalized.

7

Anonymous #11 10w

It’s neither, a fetus is not a person

11

Anonymous #8 10w

Fucking look it up

-5

Anonymous #11 10w

Grandpa it’s okay you wandered into a college board. Go back to watching Fox News everything will be okay I promise.

13

Anonymous #11 10w

Fucking take your meds

10

Anonymous #4 10w

Ew. Why would I watch that shit? It's ran by Israel

0

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

Reminds me of the "it's just a clump of cells" argument. Since everyone is a clump of cells, then it's totally fine if I just started killing people on the streets right?

-5

Anonymous #11 10w

Well the difference between a clump of cells inside of a womb and a clump of cells outside of the womb is sentience. A fetus has no awareness of its existence, a person does.

10

Anonymous #8 10w

Are you trying to insinuate that because of my opinion that I'm unwell and I should "take my meds"? Are you trying to say that people that need medication are somehow worse than others?

-4

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

Ah. So because it isn't conscious yet it's okay to kill it? Where do we draw the line? Fetuses? Newborns? 6 months? 2 years? None of these people have gained consciousness like us, yet they're still alive and human. Are they okay to kill too?

-2

Anonymous #11 10w

Consciousness and sentience aren’t the same. A newborn baby is sentient but not conscious. The line is wherever the mother, her doctor, and her god draw it.

8

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

Sorry I forgot to respond. I was drinking and making a pizza. I see what you did there referring it to the fetus as only her instead of his/her which means you have ball knowledge on the subject and are referring to that all humans start off as resembling girls during that stage since the X gene is the only gene expressing itself until the 6th week during which the Y gene activates if present. Since you're referencing this, it leads me to the conclusion that you draw the line somewhere. When?

-1

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

Imma be so fr, im too tired to continue this rn. Let's finish this tmw so I can go back to drinking beer and pirating anime

0

Anonymous #7 10w

So then, if I don’t wanna have kids ever does that mean then I should be a virgin until I die? Cause if so, you just wanna be controlling and push purity culture and that’s fucking weird.

5

Anonymous #7 10w

Psychologically and scientifically speaking, it is unhealthy to never have sex. It is unhealthy to be a non-sexual creature. humans are by nature sexual. Learn some fucking science, moron.

8

Anonymous #11 10w

In other words, you’re getting cooked and can’t come up with anything else to say

5

Anonymous #11 10w

You can’t legally take someone else’s organs without consent, so therefore it shouldn’t be legal for a fetus to deprive a woman of her health without consent.

4

Hold on, let me get my bingo card ready.

5

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

Dude deleted his comment…

4

Anonymous #11 10w

I believe you misunderstood, I was referring to “her” as the mother. The mother draws the line along with the doctor and whatever god she believes in. Not the fetus. I have no place to draw that line since I’m not pregnant, and the government definitely doesn’t get to draw the line either. I believe that individuals should be able to make whatever healthcare decisions they choose without government intervention, that’s why I’m pro-choice. Legislation has no place in a doctor’s office.

8

Anonymous #8 10w

Of course y'all are going to think that I'm getting cooked. Like this app is 90% left leaning people. If I say something other than a left leaning opinion it will get downvoted. Y'all should be able to realize that this app is an echo chamber and isn't reflective of what Americans actually think. Like I bet you believe that because I voted for Trump and want to make America great again, that I would suck Trump off. In truth I hate the guy ever since I realized he's not putting America first and

-5

Anonymous #11 10w

Has become the top goy

-1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

I was writing a better one. I would rather not do this now since I've been drinking, but if you insist, I will.

0

Anonymous #11 10w

You got what you voted for

5

Anonymous #11 10w

I’ve been drinking too, come at me.

7

Anonymous #11 10w

Alright, I apologize for catching you at a bad time.

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

You got that right

2

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

Not like Kamala would've been better in regards to Israel. Both were funded by aipac.

3

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

Fuck yeah I love alcohol

3

Anonymous #11 10w

Even if I give you the benefit of the doubt on the Kamala thing, you have to admit she’d be less likely to build a concentration camp on American soil. This was obvious even before the election.

5

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

Bingo is for old people, can we play euchre instead?

1

Anonymous #11 10w

I’ve never encountered an anti Israel Trump voter. I’m so curious about your thoughts now.

5

Anonymous #11 10w

Eh, I always seem to lose at euchre. Few things hit the dopamine quite like a good diagonal bingo.

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

I'd agree that she wouldn't have built the camp Trump has, but calling it a concentration camp isn't accurate. Unless if you don't believe in the holocaust, in which case it's closer to what holocaust deniers claim a concentration camp was.

0

Anonymous #11 10w

Actually I take it back I'm just being dumb. It's nothing close to concentration camps in any regards. It's literally just a holding ground for people waiting to be deported

0

Anonymous #11 10w

It by definition is…

3

Anonymous #11 10w

So what’s the difference between Alligator Alcatraz and a concentration camp? Bc concentration camps in Nazi Germany started as detention centers where people waited to be deported, until there was nowhere they could be deported to…

4

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

I was so excited for Trump. I thought he was going to fix everything. I bought into his lies about ending illegal immigration and putting America first. But clearly he's put Israel first. No way I'm going to support someone that deports people that are here LEGALLY just for talking shit about Israel. The guy has even thought about ways to strip natural us born citizens of their citizenship for criticizing the false state that is Israel.

5

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

The holocaust museum in DC says that the difference between modern prisons and a concentration camp is that the people in prison are afforded due process of law which renders a criminal conviction. People in concentration camps are not afforded due process of law and are not being punished for a crime.

3

Anonymous #11 10w

Okay, yes. I agree with a lot of that. It was clear he was going to support Israel far before he was elected, though. Like, a lot of people saw it coming.

2

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

You just gotta play more euchre. Once you start winning over half of your games it feels amazing. I will admit though, being the first person to get a bingo, especially a diagonal is amazing.

1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

"To await mass execution"...

1

Anonymous #11 10w

What does it say six words before that?

1

Anonymous #11 10w

Besides, considering the weather surveillance cuts and the location of the camp, Trump’s practically P R A Y I N G that all the prisoners die in an “unforeseeable” hurricane.

1

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

You make a good point, but you forget that this is America. We have the 2nd amendment. I guarantee you that no matter what political party someone belongs to, the moment executions of prisoners in that camp occur, there would be rebellion against this administration.

1

Anonymous #11 10w

Concentration camps did not start as extermination camps. The ‘final solution’ was not put into action until after people were already being detained in concentration camps. The ‘final solution’ only came about after the nazis realized that they could not deport the Jews since no other country would accept them.

3

Anonymous #11 10w

So naive of you to believe that they would tell us that they were executing people in those camps.

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

Tbf, Kamala would've supported them just as much. My main issue with Kamala was just how anti gun she was.

1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

Forced labor? I've yet to hear of anything suggesting that they would be used for labor

1

Anonymous #11 10w

I agree that Kamala’s anti-gun rhetoric was very concerning. But for every concerning trait Kamala had, Trump had 4.

3

Anonymous #11 10w

Well it’s not like she could’ve gotten rid of the second amendment. Gun rights are actually agreed upon bi-partisan, the media just doesn’t want Trump voters to know that.

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

Yeah right. You really think the top goy would do that?

1

Anonymous #11 10w

It said “sometimes”

1

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

There is surveillance everywhere nowadays. We would find out sooner or later

1

Anonymous #11 10w

Like how we found out how Epstein died, right?

3

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

So youre saying Trump is going to fail to deport them and then execute them?

1

Anonymous #11 10w

I’m honestly a little shocked that you think that Trump values human life.

1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

I just couldn't justify myself voting for Kamala. I agreed more with what Trump was saying at the time. If only the fucker kept his word.

1

Anonymous #11 10w

I’m saying that that happened in Nazi Germany. I’m not predicting anything but if I’ve learned anything from being a history major, it’s that history repeats itself one way or another.

3

Anonymous #11 10w

Tbf he kept his word on a lot of things… he said a lot of bad things.

5

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

From what I've seen and what democrats congressmen have said, they want most guns to be heavily restricted which is stupid. They make up information and blame the AR-15 when the majority of deaths to guns are actually suicides and the next is homicides done by handguns. Very small amount is done by AR-15s. Guns are the only thing that can keep government in check. It's what's stopping government from censoring us like UK is doing to their citizens

1

Anonymous #11 10w

I’m pro 2nd amendment in that I think everyone of sound mind should have a gun. But I don’t think anyone should own something that can kill 30 people in 10 seconds if the wielder wills it.

2

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

Oh come on. We all know the truth about Epstein. But Trump is such a good goy and made all of it disappear for his rich friends and himself. We don't need definitive proof to know all the time.

3

Anonymous #11 10w

I’m a socialist so I believe in an armed working class. What you have to realize is that a president wouldn’t be able to unilaterally dismantle gun rights. There would have to be enough support for it in Congress, which there is not.

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

I think he values life as long as it follows Israel's plan.

1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

And so did Kamala.

1

Anonymous smokin_on_em 10w

If Kamala had won the election, there's a fair chance that gun rights would have been taken away within 10-20 years, but as it stands now, gen Z is the most far right generation in a LONG time. While I don't consider myself a socialist, I think we need a lot more social programs. As long as it only goes to Americans since globalism sucks and Americans should come first

2

Anonymous #11 10w

Okay, not sure whether this is a compliment or an insult, but I find your political reasoning fascinating.

4

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

I don't know whether to receive it as a compliment or insult. But I'd like to think I'm like most Americans, forced to vote for one side even though you disagree with a lot of their opinions but you agree with them slightly more than the other side. The 2 party system is restarded

3

Anonymous #11 10w

Aight im going to respond to more comments in like 25 minutes because im going to drink another beer and watch a other episode of "Rascal Does Not Dream of Bunny Girl Senpai"

3

Anonymous #11 10w

See ya

3

Anonymous #7 10w

Well most of that 95% is done with the first 4-6 weeks and thus isn’t doing anything an IUD isn’t. So really most of the female population is ‘killing babies’ just in different ways. I’m a man so my hands are clean but you probably have friends who’d you consider ‘murderers’.

4

Anonymous #7 10w

I get the idea that you want people who have sex, get pregnant and don’t want the baby to live with their consequences, and then not have sex instead of getting an abortion. In a perfect world I’d agree. I’m pro choice bc any person who has sex and gets pregnant and doesn’t want the kid shouldnt have to deal with that decision for the rest of their life, or even nine months. More importantly this doesn’t affect you, and I wonder why you care so much. If someone gives birth to a kid they dont-

3

Anonymous #16 10w

Want, they’ll either get adopted (yay) or go into foster care, or be neglected then go into foster care. Maybe a women have a child as a consequence isn’t going to fix the abortion issue, the mom won’t suddenly be ok with being a parent, we can’t expect them to. Would be great but not realistic. So I see your argument and I raise you that right now, our current support system isn’t good enough for that argument to hold up. Like yeah, don’t get pregnant is the solution but WHEN that doesn’t-

3

Anonymous #16 10w

Happen, then what? We need better support for baby’s whose mothers don’t or can’t take care of them. We don’t have that. You wouldn’t want someone else’s kid they wanted to abort and couldn’t. That’s the really sad issue. So ‘keep your legs closed or raise the kid’ is a dumb argument bc it’s a preventative measure that doesn’t always work. And when it doesn’t - women should ALWAYS from there be able to chose what to do with a med professional. We can teach better sec ed and preach what your -

3

Anonymous #16 10w

Saying, and I think we should cause less pregnancy less abortion. But it’s unrealistic that everyone’s going to do that right now. What then? Give them the option to abort. they wouldn’t do it if they think they could handle it. They know the life they’d be giving that kid. They may not be ready. Why restrict that choice if it isn’t impacting anyone else? And we don’t have a better solution right now (besides adoption which is nice) fix foster systems, make having kids more affordable, and mayb

2

Anonymous #16 10w

Less ppl who accidentally get pregnant would consider otherwise. And if they don’t, it’s still their choice

3

Anonymous #11 9w

does the data show how many of those were children? or where it might've been necessary in order to keep the mother alive?? not everyone gets an abortion bc they forgot to use protection. it's a medical procedure after all.

1