
japan had a tyrannical monarch rather than a political party that took over and erased all the others. they had an emperor worship issue (or Shinto nationalism) not like what happened in italy or germany. historians often call it “militarist authoritarianism” or “japanese fascism” cause its not exactly the same
cause it has every time. but again, liberalism is not “the libs” its the free market of opinion. when u let people say, believe, or most importantly persuade others into believing WHATEVER they want… without the ability for interference… it inevitably leads to issues look at jonestown for example. unrestricted religious freedom makes it so the gov cannot interfere when it gets too extreme
Kind of? Post ww1 was only the very beginning of the liberal world order. I’d hardly say they fell out of something they had barely fallen into. Point being after ww2, when the world order was more established, they haven’t strayed as far from that order as much as many other nations have. The US as a prime example.
i never said nazism is traditional. i said fascism plays upon, or uses tradition and myth as a selling point in the early stages and the social culture of germany. yk how every new generation complains about how times are changing and it was better back in their day? fascist rulers use that feeling but multiply it like crazy. they convince people the country’s going down hill, that its an emergency and the nation needs them (the fascist ruler) to come in, take all the power and fix it. they als
why are we still talking about how to define fascism. fascism often rises (eventually) when extreme views and actions are allowed….. because a free market place for opinion allows the strongest, most influential, not necessarily most true/right opinion to lead. eventually, bad people will abuse this market and capitalize off of people’s weaknesses. this is how cults form. opinions have become cult