Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Name a time fascism HASNT arose out of a liberal democracy….. (and no, this use of liberal does not refer to “liberals”)
upvote 7 downvote

🎏
Anonymous 3w

Japan

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

ultranationalism isnt the same as fascism

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Japan was fascist

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

they were not a one party state

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

Don’t jinx it. Germany…? I think the trend is countries that have felt fascism tend to reject fascism. Italians would beg to differ, though.

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

One party state isn’t the same as fascism

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

for a state to be considered fascist by definition, it needs to suppress any opposition to the regime. japan still had the Seiyūkai and Minseitō political parties even under a authoritarian monarch

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

germany was under liberal democracy before the hitler era

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

So is political assassination and dissolving the party not suppression?

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Seems to me like you just wanna force “fascism comes from liberalism”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

japan had a tyrannical monarch rather than a political party that took over and erased all the others. they had an emperor worship issue (or Shinto nationalism) not like what happened in italy or germany. historians often call it “militarist authoritarianism” or “japanese fascism” cause its not exactly the same

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

cause it has every time. but again, liberalism is not “the libs” its the free market of opinion. when u let people say, believe, or most importantly persuade others into believing WHATEVER they want… without the ability for interference… it inevitably leads to issues look at jonestown for example. unrestricted religious freedom makes it so the gov cannot interfere when it gets too extreme

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Okay call it whatever you want, but it’s pretty clear to everyone it was fascist. I get why there’s confusion, everything under the sun that isn’t far leftist gets accused of fascism. But Japan was actually fascist

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

People are persuaded by the truth. I don’t see a need to suppress the opposition when you have the truth (not to mention how they’d react if they got power over you!)

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

political historians would disagree with you. it is very similar but because they were under a monarchy, and it wasnt a political party, it isnt considered the same thing

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

people are NOT persuaded by the truth. they are persuaded by what they want to be true. fascism is built on both tradition and myth

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Kind of? Post ww1 was only the very beginning of the liberal world order. I’d hardly say they fell out of something they had barely fallen into. Point being after ww2, when the world order was more established, they haven’t strayed as far from that order as much as many other nations have. The US as a prime example.

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

People are persuaded by the truth and fascism is not built on tradition

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

facism uses tradition and myth to influence opinion. they create modern myths (like the idea that jewish people run the world) and idealize previous, a more traditional, period in the country’s time

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Nazism is paganism there’s nothing traditional about it

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

germany had their own version of “make germany great again” before the full fledged nazism

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Okay? Germany was objectively worse after being plundered by WW1

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

they idealize the past as a way to demonize the progressive changes of the present. its usually rooted in their kind of white supremacy too

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

what are we even arguing here?? i feel like were not seeing thr same conversation

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

There wasn’t progressive change happening in Germany. It was just debt to the winners of WW1…

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

cultural change…

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I’m arguing that Nazism is not traditional

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

What cultural change? Germany was German

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

i never said nazism is traditional. i said fascism plays upon, or uses tradition and myth as a selling point in the early stages and the social culture of germany. yk how every new generation complains about how times are changing and it was better back in their day? fascist rulers use that feeling but multiply it like crazy. they convince people the country’s going down hill, that its an emergency and the nation needs them (the fascist ruler) to come in, take all the power and fix it. they als

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

also tend to intertwine myth into that (as seen with germany blaming jewish people for this “catastrophic” change

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Fascism isn’t just one thing in a box, which is why you can’t write off Japan as “not being fascist” for x y or z reason

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

so do you want to have a conversation or do you just want to win somewhere?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 3w

why are we still talking about how to define fascism. fascism often rises (eventually) when extreme views and actions are allowed….. because a free market place for opinion allows the strongest, most influential, not necessarily most true/right opinion to lead. eventually, bad people will abuse this market and capitalize off of people’s weaknesses. this is how cults form. opinions have become cult

upvote 6 downvote