Anonymous #1 16w

I didn’t know Israeli diplomat was a protected class. Likes it’s without a doubt 1st degree but Israeli diplomat being a protected class is news to me

7

Anonymous #2 16w

That’s not how that works. It would only be antisemitic if they were targeted specifically for being Jewish but all the available information states otherwise

8

Anonymous OP 16w

It was still antisemitism

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

How if the reason had nothing to do with being Jewish?

5

Anonymous OP 16w

It had to do with being Jewish and Israeli, considering the group that hosted the event you douche

-4

Anonymous OP 16w

It’s still a hate crime based on the nationality and religion of the victims. One one was Jewish and one was Israeli.

-3

Anonymous OP 16w

Targeting someone just for being Israeli is a hate crime

-3

Anonymous #3 16w

That’s exactly what op is doing

-3

Anonymous #2 16w

Why are you being a ahole to me when I wasn’t one to you? Sorry that I believe u can’t claim antisemitism if the attack wasn’t done due to hate of Judaism. In the killers manifesto he wrote about the genocide being done by Israel as his motivation. He went to the event & didn’t attack random people but instead two people he was sure were Israeli diplomats one wasn’t even Jewish. That doesn’t sound antisemitic. Bad & wrong yes but antisemitic no

6

Anonymous OP 16w

The one being an ahole is you. Stop trying to justify what happened

-3

Anonymous OP 16w

One of the victims was Jewish

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

they were targeted for being associated with a political group ?

5

Anonymous OP 16w

people wouldnt go out of there way to kill russian diplomats. killing someone based on shit like that doesn’t make it ok.

0

Anonymous #4 16w

They were targeted for being Israeli

-2

Anonymous #3 16w

I never said what he did was okay hell in a previous comment I said it was bad so idk how you figure I’m justifying it. As for other groups first of all Christian isn’t a minority group in America. Second if a minority was killed purely based on being a minority then yes I’d call it a hate crime but if they were killed for obviously a different reason then I would still say it was bad but I wouldn’t call it a hate crime

6

Anonymous OP 16w

One of the victims was a Jew. And one was Israeli. It’s still a hate crime.

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

It literally says he did it after finding out they were embassy employees. After he found out who they worked for.

7

Anonymous OP 16w

Killing someone just for being Israeli is a hate crime

-1

Anonymous OP 16w

tbh i think you are trying to justify the killing of people, would it be okay for a person to kill people from lets say China because china does us dirty?

3

Anonymous #3 16w

Never said it was okay. I specifically said it was bad so idk what you’re point is

5

Anonymous #4 16w

It was a still a hate crime

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

It’s not a hate crime if you kill someone for a choice they made. They didn’t come out of the womb with embassy status. I’m not justifying the murder. I’m only correcting your incorrect assertion that this is a hate crime. By definition it isn’t.

6

Anonymous #4 16w

It was a hate crime. One of the victims was Jewish and one was Israeli

-1

Anonymous #4 16w

The victim didn’t chose to be Israeli

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

So? Where in the screenshot does it say he targeted them for their ethnicity? Quote that portion.

5

Anonymous #4 16w

Just fuck off

-2

Anonymous #3 16w

What are you talking about I said multiple times that the killing was bad so your question makes 0 sense. If I said killing the Israeli diplomats are bad what do you think my answer is to your question about China. Please use your brain instead of shadow boxing & getting mad at things I didn't even say

5

Anonymous #2 16w

You’re mad because I told you to prove that it was a hate crime.

3

Anonymous #4 16w

You can look at the facts of where the event was held who held it and who the victims were. It was a hate crime.

-3

Anonymous #2 16w

If it’s so obvious then quote where it says it in the screenshot.

2

Anonymous #2 16w

They weren’t killed for being Israeli. One of them wasn’t even Israeli. They were killed for being Israeli diplomats. As I’ve said multiple times the killing is wrong but idk why you guys keep on making up reasons for it when we have the info

3

Anonymous #4 16w

You can read the entire post

-2

Anonymous OP 16w

One of them was Israeli and one was Jewish.

0

Anonymous #2 16w

I did. Quote it, if it’s true, this should be easy. Quote the part of the screenshot that states that they were targeted for their ethnicity and stop throwing a tantrum. You being offended doesn’t make it a hate crime.

0

Anonymous OP 16w

Your first and second sentence contradict themselves

-1

Anonymous #4 16w

No one is throwing a tantrum.

1

Anonymous #2 16w

Didn’t quote it. Try again.

0

Anonymous #4 16w

I don’t have to quote it. You’re just a weirdo

1

Anonymous #2 16w

So you can’t actually prove it. Got it!

0

Anonymous #4 16w

I did prove it you douche.

0

Anonymous #4 16w

I don’t need to quote it to prove it

1

Anonymous #4 16w

The facts speak for themselves

0

Anonymous #2 16w

Unless you believe all Israelis or all Jews are born Israeli diplomats then there’s no contradiction

3

Anonymous #2 16w

No you didn’t. You just cried that it was, and then told me to go away when I told you to prove it. Try again, prove that they were targeted for their ethnicity.

2

Anonymous #4 16w

Fuck off

-1

Anonymous #4 16w

Considering the facts of the case, it was a hate crime based

0

Anonymous #2 16w

There it is again. If it was really a hate crime you’d be able to prove it. You wouldn’t get so offended you try to run away and avoid it lol

2

Anonymous OP 16w

Missing the point

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

Define hate crime.

3

Anonymous #4 16w

It was a hate crime. You don’t pace outside a Jewish event at a Jewish museum hosting Jews and Israelis and then shoot people coming out of the event and then run inside and shout free Palestine and then come out and try and blend with the crowd and then shout free Palestine again as you’re being arrested. It was a hate crime.

-1

Anonymous #4 16w

It was hate based on the victims identities

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

He targeted 2 people. AFTER finding out who they worked for. If I targeted someone for being a cop, and they were white, would that be a hate crime since a majority of cops are white?

1

Anonymous #4 16w

That’s still a hate crime because he targeted them for who they worked for and who they were

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

Define hate crime. Try to define it without looking it up. You’re insanely ignorant. That’s by definition not a hate crime

1

Anonymous #4 16w

It’s a hate crime. You just don’t want to face it

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

What is a hate crime? Should be an easy answer bud. Or will you cry like you did when I told you to quote that.

1

Anonymous #4 16w

I have a strong feeling you’re arguing with Canada spammer

3

Anonymous #5 16w

Probably, he’s just as dumb lol

3

Anonymous #4 16w

I don’t have to quote it. There’s nothing to quote

-1

Anonymous #4 16w

I’m not a he

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

What. Is. A. Hate. Crime?

-1

Anonymous #4 16w

a crime, typically one involving violence, that is motivated by prejudice on the basis of ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or similar grounds.

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

Great, is there a single word in that definition that says anything about employment status?

1

Anonymous #4 16w

It was still a hate crime based on one of the victims being Israeli and one being a Jew. Fuck off

-1

Anonymous #4 16w

Stop making excuses

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

Didn’t answer. Try again, yes or no? Is there?

1

Anonymous #4 16w

I answered. I’m not gonna fall for your rage bait anymore

2

Anonymous #2 16w

You didn’t actually. It’s a yes or no question and you just told me to fuck off instead. That’s not an answer. That’s just you crying Try again.

3

Anonymous #5 16w

nah its moviebuff, moosefucker would be telling you he hopes your family gets raped by now

2

Anonymous #6 16w

ahhh maybe I blocked them too lmao

4

Anonymous #2 16w

i would like you to please look up the definition of a hate crime

5

Anonymous #7 16w

I did. What happened in dc was a hate crime

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

Yes or no. Try again moron.

2

Anonymous #2 16w

That’s what I thought.

4

Anonymous #4 16w

I’m not falling for your rage bait anymore

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

Me asking you questions isn’t rage bait unless you’re just that sensitive.

3

Anonymous #2 16w

You’re just offended you couldn’t lie lol

3

Anonymous #4 16w

I’m not lying.

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

Sure you are. Asking you a yes or no question made you run away. Yes or no? See you’re gonna avoid it again

2

Anonymous #4 16w

I’m not the only one saying this was a hate crime

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

Not an answer. And you won’t ever and that’s because you know you’re lying.

3

Anonymous #4 16w

I answered and I’m not gonna answer again. I gave you the definition and you won’t listen

-2

Anonymous #4 16w

And there was no yes or no question

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

Yes or no, does the definition you gave me say anything about employment status?

2

Anonymous #4 16w

No. It doesn’t but that doesn’t make what happened not a hate crime.

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

thanks for admitting that targeting people for employment status isn’t a hate crime😁

4

Anonymous #4 16w

They were targeted for being Israeli and Jewish as well as employment status. Being targeted for being Israeli and Jewish is what made it a hate crime.

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

You said the facts speak for themselves and you just admitted it’s by definition; not a hate crime. Thanks moron

3

Anonymous #4 16w

It was still a hate crime. Where they worked isn’t what made it one though.

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

You already admitted it wasn’t

1

Anonymous #4 16w

That screenshot proves nothing

-2

Anonymous #4 16w

Deliberately attacking Israelis and Jews is a hate crime

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

You said it’s not a hate crime if people are targeted for where they work. The screenshot says they were targeted for where they worked. It proves everything lol and you helped me prove my point

3

Anonymous #4 16w

They were also targeted for being Israeli and Jewish.

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

You say that but the facts disagree lol. I even gave you the chance to quote that to prove me wrong but you just got offended instead

4

Anonymous #4 16w

The facts don’t disagree with me.

-2

Anonymous #4 16w

You can go away now

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

what are the facts then

3

Anonymous #2 16w

"you can go away now" plsss 😭😭😭

2

Anonymous #6 16w

I explained it multiple times. They were low level embassy staffers who were Israeli and Jewish and were outside a Jewish event hosted by a Jewish advocacy group at a Jew museum.

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

Then quote the part of the screenshot that says they were targeted for their ethnicity. I’ll wait.

3

Anonymous #2 16w

*jewish

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

You already admitted it’s not a hate crime by definition. If you’re still offended you can run away. I’m gonna keep facing the truth here bud even if you don’t like it

3

Anonymous #2 16w

and there is evidence that they were targeted for being part of the israeli embassy

1

Anonymous #6 16w

That doesn’t make what happened ok

-2

Anonymous #4 16w

It was still a hate crime.

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

did i say that?

2

Anonymous #6 16w

There are a shit ton of people attempting to justify what happened

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

ok cool we ara talking about how it wasnt a hate crime and youre putting words in our mouth to deflect

3

Anonymous #6 16w

No one is putting words in your mouth.

-2

Anonymous #6 16w

It was a hate crime and I’m not responding anymore

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

more deflection lmao

4

Anonymous #2 16w

You already admitted it wasn’t lol

1

Anonymous OP 16w

They were targeted based on their nationality. That’s a textbook hate crime case

0

Anonymous #1 16w

Literally says otherwise but keep denying facts

4

Anonymous #5 16w

nah it’s twootters the well known zionist on lgbtq group

5

Anonymous #7 16w

Get over yourself

-2

Anonymous #7 16w

we know her very well over here too yall might be due for some schizo posting over there tho

3

I’m not a guy and I already explained why it was a hate crime

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

bc you said it was one?

3

Anonymous #6 16w

Multiple people not just me have said it is. And based on the circumstances it is.

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

the circumstances of them working for the israeli embassy

3

Anonymous #6 16w

You cannot just go to a Jewish museum hosting a Jewish event from a Jewish group and shout free Palestine and murder Jews and Israelis. It doesn’t matter who they worked for

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

you cant work for a government actively committing a holocaust then hide behind being a minority status when you get targeted for that governments actions

2

Anonymous #6 16w

Stop trying to justify what happened

0

Anonymous #2 16w

im not im just saying its not a hate crime unless israel is all of a sudden a protected group

3

Anonymous #6 16w

It’s still a hate crime based on the victims being a Jewish woman and Israeli man

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

i pity you for the fear you must live in everyday

3

Anonymous #6 16w

If it was another group being targeted in this way, you would be shouting hate crime. Why won’t you do that for the Jew and the Israeli who were killed violently by a deranged mad man ?

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

You’re really hell bent on making this something that it’s not. Also the only people who believe it’s a hate crime are Zionist. Again it’s bad & is 1st degree but no matter how badly Zionist want it to be true Israeli diplomats isn’t a protected class. All the available info including the killers manifesto makes it clear he picked his victims because they’re Israeli diplomats & his views of Israel’s genocide & nothing else.

3

Anonymous OP 16w

One of the victims was Jewish and one was of Israeli nationality. That’s what makes it a hate crime.

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

As it's been pointed out to you 1000 times that's not how that works. There were plenty of other Jews & Israelis that the shooter could have killed but chose not to. He could have easily emptied his gun but chose not to because his goal wasn't to kill Jews or even Israelis. As we all know now he picked his victims because of their jobs not because of their race or where they were born so again for that reason you can't call it a hate crime.

3

Anonymous OP 16w

He went to a Jewish event hosted by a Jewish group at a Jewish museum

-2

Anonymous #2 16w

He didn’t go because it was hosting Jews which you already know. Again he didn’t randomly shoot people hoping to get Jews. The even was hosting young diplomats that’s why he went & instead of just randomly shooting & assuming he talked to a bunch of people until he was sure that his victims would be Israeli diplomats. So again not hate crime but yes his actions were wrong & a crime just not a hate crime.

4

Anonymous #2 16w

Not by your own definition

1

Anonymous OP 16w

It’s a hate crime because they were Israeli.

-1

Anonymous OP 16w

It was hosted by a Jewish group….

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

No one was targeted for being Israeli so not a hate crime. Nor was targeted because they were Jewish or because the host was Jewish

1

Anonymous OP 16w

You just said they were targeted for being Israeli

-1

Anonymous #2 16w

The facts disagree with you here

1

Anonymous #2 16w

They said Israeli diplomats. You have to lie about what they said because you know they’re wrong lol Just like you run away every time I tell you to quote the portion where it would prove you right

3