Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download

default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

There are also more people looking to adopt than children available to be adopted. The problem is that it’s too expensive and too difficult for them to be placed.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

That is the biggest sig non sequitur I've seen in a while

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

Prolife organizations are the biggest funders of foster homes and orphanages.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Stats? Cause you’re just making up bs at this point

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Exactly why we shouldn’t be bringing even more kids into the world

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

I think it means we need to reform the foster system cause you’re also ignoring those thousands of kids at that point

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

Well yeah. That too

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

That’s not the stats I was asking for bruh.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

Okay try again and maybe look at what I was responding to that might help you

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

AGAHAHAHA DUMBASS

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w
post
upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

Sorry. I confused you with the other commenter to my other statement. Myb

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

That doesn’t state they are the majority. I found the article and did a read myself: it’s states that 19% of Christian’s donate to orphanages, and it literally continues stating this:

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

“Unfortunately,” the study concludes, “this substantial support of orphanages may be perpetuating a model of orphan care not best for children. Decades of research has shown that families – not orphanages – are the best environment for children to receive the care they need in order to flourish. … U.S. Christians’ support needs to shift to strengthening families to care for these children.”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

So overall, your comment stating “Christian’s are the biggest funders” still does not have a credible source yet. All you showed was 19% of individual (not organizations) Christian’s donate to orphanages.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Another point made from that article

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

Someone is mad that I’m saying we need a better foster system 💀💀

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

I guess so. I just clicked the first link I googled. Enjoy your Saturday.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

Also, you can be Christian and pro choice so you strictly using Christian research doesn’t help at all

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

That’s a counterintuitive statement. Christians can’t be pro choice. They believe that life begins at conception.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

That’s not a defining point of Christianity. You can be Christian and pro choice

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

And you completely refused to acknowledge my other points, furthermore, you don’t need to be Christian to be pro life either. Your “source” is useless

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

If you believe the Bible is 100% in Aaron, which is a key point of Christianity. Then you would believe that life begins at conception as the Bible states clearly. Pro choice and Christian don’t exist.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Okay so I hope you don’t have tattoos. I hope you’re not wearing 2 different fabrics. Don’t eat shellfish. There are HUNDREDS of people who do these thing and they’re still Christian.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

And you still avoided the rest of what I said, your “source” isn’t helping your original statement at all

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

According to this article, by southwestern, there are Christian’s who are pro choice. They’re labeled as Christian, so how could that be?!?! Wait it’s because it is possible

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

I would argue that they aren’t Christians then. And maybe the stat that I claimed to you earlier is an old one. So I could be wrong about the percentage of finding currently. Just know that orphanages were predominantly started by the church and ran by them.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

No it just isn’t related to your comment, your comment was claiming majority of donations are from pro life organizations. Your “source” was about how 19% of Christian individuals donate to orphanages

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

And yes because you know more than Ashley Allen, assistant professor in women ministries at southwestern Baptist

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Because as a Christian, you can be pro choice, but for yourself you would never have an abortion because it’s YOUR CHOICE. But FURTHERMORE you understand that your religion should not be infringing on others rights who do not believe in the religion.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

You can argue that you would be infringing on the rights of the baby if you killed it in the womb. Next argument.

upvote 1 downvote