Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
A. It was self defense B. The jury was going to convict him no matter what C. If the roles were reversed Metcalf would’ve gotten off D. People around the country were assuming he was guilty before he was charged
Can I ask why so many people are actually defending Karmelo Anthony? Is it a racial bias? I honestly don’t think it should be a race thing at all, from what I’ve seen, he stabbed someone to death and that’s that.
upvote 8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 17w

He stabbed a guy in the chest because he got pushed. He brought a knife to a track meet in an upper middle class Dallas suburb. He verbally threatened the guy when they were arguing and refused to listen to their reasonable request to leave their tent. Witnesses testify he was the aggressor and attorneys in both sides said the case had nothing to do with race. There’s no logical reason to defend this guy.

upvote 29 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 17w

A is what the trial was about, B & C are baseless claims, D is the only valid reason.

upvote 1 downvote