Anonymous #1 12w

there is no such thing as a hereditary “top 1%”.

9

Anonymous #1 12w

Tf you mean both

10

Anonymous #1 12w

Fence sitter we got a fence sitter! 🫵

10

Anonymous just_a_bucket 12w

I don’t think he’s a fence sitter I think he’s a Nazi. Bro actually thinks a hereditary top 1% exists

10

Anonymous #2 12w

Dehumanizing rich people is bad, and so is eugenics

1

Anonymous #1 12w

Oh well that’s a bit different. We’re not talking about rich ppl we’re talking about billionaires who yes, are not human.

1

Anonymous #1 12w

Is being taxed more “dehumanizing”?

1

Anonymous #2 12w

And that’s exactly what I’m talking about

1

Anonymous OP 12w

No, what #2 said is tho

1

Anonymous #1 12w

yeah I don’t endorse the “rich people aren’t human” part. I’m not really sure they said anything to that effect before you said they were dehumanizing rich people tho your OG reply really did make it sound like you believed in a hereditary 1%. I think that’s why they called you a Nazi

6

Anonymous #1 12w

These are ppl who have built bunkers to sit in while the world erupts into nuclear war, watch us all die while sipping champagne, and then come out to take over again. They don’t consider you human. I’m just matching the energy

7

Anonymous OP 12w

No I am 100% calling billionaires lizard people in human skin

1

Anonymous #2 12w

Bucket agrees why should we humanize them when they don’t even humanize us or care about the stability of our world

5