Anonymous blue__wave 15h

It shouldn’t be normal - you’re crazy

-3

Anonymous #2 15h

It is a norm to some extent kids have to get vaccines, military etc. I know you’re already mind fucked by Joe Rogan or something, but people shouldn’t have the right to not get vaccinated bc it damages other people’s right to life.

18

Anonymous blue__wave 15h

Their right to life? Oh no they may get a slightly worse cold. I understand vaccines for other more serious diseases and illnesses, but just because someone gets sick doesn’t mean you have the right to force medical procedures on people

-3

Anonymous #2 15h

… buddy doesn’t know that influenza killed more kids in 2025 than it has in decades and measles (a preventable disease that also kills kids) has made a comeback due to anti-vax rhetoric

14

Anonymous #2 15h

Over a million people died from COVID in the U.S. For most people covid isn’t serious but it is for people with pre existing conditions the elderly etc.

5

Anonymous blue__wave 15h

Oh NOW you fucks believe in a “right to life” 🤣

-3

Anonymous OP 15h

Yes I believe in right to life for people not single cell zygotes or fetuses without consciousness.

17

Anonymous OP 15h

I like how by your logic people shouldn’t be forced through a medical procedure but they should be forced to go through a pregnancy, how does that make any sense?

9

Anonymous blue__wave 15h

They aren’t being forced to go through a pregnancy unless the state impregnated them. I know, people have to be responsible for their own decisions.

-2

Anonymous OP 15h

you are entirely incapable of having a nuanced discussion about this.

12

Anonymous OP 15h

“Oh you care about schoolchildren? What about the microscopic objects huh hypocrite???”

9

Anonymous OP 15h

You’re a dipshit. Just bc you accept the risk that comes with something doesn’t mean you consent to the bad outcome. If I’m driving and I get into a car wreck did I agree to enter a car wreck, bc I knew a wreck could happen?

1

Anonymous OP 15h

By this logic should we not put airbags in cars bc people need to be held responsible for driving knowing they could get into a wreck?

1

Anonymous blue__wave 15h

This makes sense if you do some risky shit on the road and are surprised it wrecked you. Obviously we don’t consent to all accidents but comparing an auto accident with a complete stranger to a known risk activity is dumb. I’m sure most drunk drivers don’t want to wreck either but when they do it’s no one’s fault but theirs. Interestingly when given drunk drivers an out via some lame punishment, pretty much always leads to same thing: chronic drunk driving.

1

Anonymous OP 15h

You think people agree to be in car accidents? literally has the word accident in the name. There’s a difference between consent and taking on a risk. Regardless even if any of this was true, which it isn’t obviously bc of what an accident definitionally is. There isn’t any harm to a person ultimately.

1

Anonymous OP 15h

And you can be a perfect driver and still get in a wreck just like you can have safe sex and still get pregnant.

1

Anonymous blue__wave 15h

The innate motive of driving is to get from point A to point B. Crashing is an interruption of that. Getting pregnant from sex, even safe sex, is the ultimate goal of sex.

0

Anonymous #2 15h

No it’s not you think people only have sex to get pregnant? If infertile people have sex are they having like fake sex?

1

Anonymous #2 15h

i assure you. people do not have sex just to have children. more often than not, people have sex because sex is awesome.

1

Anonymous #5 14h

Doesn’t mean an easy out is an entitlement to be medically or legally provided. People like drinking but if you can’t manage your shit while partaking, that’s your own problem to solve.

0

Anonymous OP 14h

The burden of proof isn’t on other people to say why it should be easy the burden of proof is on you to say why it should be hard.

1